Stewart-Brown, Sarah L., Anthony, Rebecca, Wilson, Lynsey, Winstanley, Sarah, Stallard, Nigel, Snooks, Helen and Simkiss, Douglas E.. (2011) Should randomised controlled trials be the "gold standard" for research on preventive interventions for children? Journal of Children's Services, Vol.6 (No.4). pp. 228-235. ISSN 1746-6660

Preview

Text WRAP_Stewart-Brown_ Version.pdf - Accepted Version Download (333Kb) | Preview

Abstract

Purpose - Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been offered a privileged position in terms of the evidence base for preventive interventions for children, but practical and theoretical issues challenge this research methodology. This paper aims to address this issue. Design/methodology/approach - This paper analyses practical and methodological issues of using RCTs within children's preventive services and presents the results of a qualitative study using data collected from parents who were asked to take part in an RCT of a preventive intervention. Findings - Well recognised issues include the impossibility of blinding participants, the problem of identifying a pre-eminent outcome measure for complex interventions, and problems with limiting access to equivalent interventions in real world settings. A further theoretical problem is the exclusion from RCTs of families who are most ready to change, resulting in a reduced level of intervention effectiveness. Qualitative evidence from one recent RCT suggests that this problem could be operating in some prevention trials. Increasing sample sizes can overcome some of these problems, but the cost of the necessarily huge trials becomes disproportionate to the intervention? Originality/value - Given the limitations on RCTs in preventive settings, the paper argues their privileged position in terms of research evidence maybe undeserved.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	R Medicine > R Medicine (General) R Medicine > RJ Pediatrics
Divisions:	Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Clinical trials, Preventive health services for children
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Children's Services
Publisher:	Pier Professional Ltd.
ISSN:	1746-6660
Date:	2011
Volume:	Vol.6
Number:	No.4
Page Range:	pp. 228-235
Identification Number:	10.1108/17466661111190929
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
References:	Adamson, J., Cockayne, S., Puffer, S., Torgerson, D.J. (2006) Review of randomised trials using the post-randomised consent (Zelen's) design. Contemporary Clinical Trials 27(4) pp.305-19. Allen, G. (2011). Early Intervention: the Next Steps. An Independent Report to Her Majesty's Government. London: Cabinet Office [online]. Available: http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/early-intervention-next-steps.pdf (accessed 23rd July 2011) Bonell, C.P., Hargreaves, J., Cousens, S., Ross, D., Haves, R., Petticrew, M., Kirkwood, B.R. (2011) Alternative to randomisation in the evaluation of public health interventions: design, challenges and solutions . J Epidemiology and Community Health, 65 (7) pp. 582-7. Brookes, S.T., Whitley, E., Peters, T.J., Mulheran, P.A., Egger, M., Davey Smith, G. (2001) Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risk of false positive and false negatives. Health Technology Assessment, 5(33) pp.1-56. Britton, A., Mckee, M., Black, N., McPerson, K., Sanderson, C., Bain, C. (1998) Choosing between randomised and non randomised studies. Health Technology Assessment 2(13) pp. 1-124. Cilliers, J. (1998) WHO Regional Office for Europe 1998: Health promotion evaluation: recommendations to policy makers: report of the WHO European Working Group on Health Promotion Evaluation Copenhagen WHO Regional Office. (document EUR/ICP/ IVST 05 01 03) Cilliers, P. (1998) Complexity and post modernism. New York: Routledge. Elias, M., Zins, J., Graczyk, P., Weissberg, R. (2003) Implementation sustainability and scaling up of social emotional and academic innovations in public schools. School Psychology Review 32 (3) pp. 303-319. Hatch, T. (2000) What does it take to break the mold? Rhetoric and reality in new American schools. Teachers College Record 102 (3) pp 561-589. Hunt, P. & Pearson, D. (2001) Motivating Change. Nursing Standard 16 (20) pp. 45-55. Hutchings, J., Gardner, F. & Lane, E. (2004) Making evidence based interventions work in clinical settings; common and specific therapy factors and implementation fidelity. In Carole Sutton, David Utting and David Farrington (Eds): Support from the start: Working with young children and their Families to reduce the risks of crime and antisocial behaviour. London: Department for Education and Skills Kane, G., Wood, V., Barlow, J. (2007) Parenting programmes: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. Child: Care Health and Development 33 (6) pp. 784-793. Kratochwill, T.R., McDonald, L., Levin, J.R., Bear-Tibbetts, H.Y., Demaray, M.K. (2004) Families and schools together: an experimental analysis of pa parent mediated multi-family group program for American Indian children. J School Psychology 42 pp.359-383. National Academy for Parenting Research (NAPR). Parenting Programme Evaluation Tool http://www.kcl.ac.uk/iop/depts/cap/research/napr/parentingprogrammesevaluationtool.aspx (accessed 23rd July 2011) MacLehoise, R.R., Reeves, B., Harvey, I.M., Sheldon, T.A., Russell, I.T., Black, A.M.S. (2000) A sytematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non- randomised studies. Health Technology Assessment 4 (34) pp. 1-154. Prochaska, J.O., DiClemente, C.C., Norcorss, J.C. (1992) In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviours. American Psychologist 47(90) pp. 1102-1104. Snooks, H.A., Bridie, A.E., Cohen, D., Nugent, M., Rapport, F., Skone, J., Meredith, A., Davis, T., O’Sullivan, D. (2011) Costs and effects of a 'healthy living' approach to community development in two deprived communities: findings from a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health 11 (1) pp.25.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/42198

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item