The Library
Dynamic pricing for impatient bidders
Tools
Bansal, Nikhil, Chen, Ning, Cherniavsky, Neva, Rurda, Atri, Schieber, Baruch and Sviridenko, Maxim (2010) Dynamic pricing for impatient bidders. ACM Transactions on Algorithms , Vol.6 (No.2). pp. 1-21. doi:10.1145/1721837.1721851 ISSN 1549-6325.
Research output not available from this repository.
Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1721837.1721851
Abstract
We study the following problem related to pricing over time. Assume there is a collection of bidders, each of whom is interested in buying a copy of an item of which there is an unlimited supply. Every bidder is associated with a time interval over which the bidder will consider buying a copy of the item, and a maximum value the bidder is willing to pay for the item. On every time unit, the seller sets a price for the item. The seller's goal is to set the prices so as to maximize revenue from the sale of copies of items over the time period.
In the first model considered, we assume that all bidders are impatient, that is, bidders buy the item at the first time unit within their bid interval that they can afford the price. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that considers this model. In the offline setting, we assume that the seller knows the bids of all the bidders in advance. In the online setting we assume that at each time unit the seller only knows the values of the bids that have arrived before or at that time unit. We give a polynomial time offline algorithm and prove upper and lower bounds on the competitiveness of deterministic and randomized online algorithms, compared with the optimal offline solution. The gap between the upper and lower bounds is quadratic.
We also consider the envy-free model in which bidders are sold the item at the minimum price during their bid interval, as long as it is not over their limit value. We prove tight bounds on the competitiveness of deterministic online algorithms for this model, and upper and lower bounds on the competitiveness of randomized algorithms with quadratic gap. The lower bounds for the randomized case in both models use a novel general technique.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects: | Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA76 Electronic computers. Computer science. Computer software | ||||
Divisions: | Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Computer Science | ||||
Journal or Publication Title: | ACM Transactions on Algorithms | ||||
Publisher: | Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. | ||||
ISSN: | 1549-6325 | ||||
Official Date: | 2010 | ||||
Dates: |
|
||||
Volume: | Vol.6 | ||||
Number: | No.2 | ||||
Page Range: | pp. 1-21 | ||||
DOI: | 10.1145/1721837.1721851 | ||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||
Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |