Brassett, James, Richardson, Ben, 1982- and Smith, William, 1977- (2010) Experimentalist governance, deliberation and democracy : a case study of primary commodity roundtables. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. (CSGR Working Papers, Vol.2010).

Preview

Text (Working paper) WRAP_Brassett_3_27110.pdf - Published Version Download (4Mb) | Preview

Abstract

The emergence of primary commodity roundtables that seek to regulate producers according to principles of sustainability represents an interesting set of dilemmas. Made up of selfselected combinations of private organizations, global civil society, and interested stakeholders they blur commonly held understandings of governance and democracy in global context. On the one hand, the absence of states suggests that, to the extent that they are successful in applying and enforcing a rigorous standard of sustainability, they must count as private makers of global public policy. On the other hand, the inclusion of global civil society within their membership suggests a set of questions for how to conceptualise and develop understandings of the political role of such organizations. In this paper, we step back from a view of global civil society as necessarily acting ‘in opposition to’ either the state or private organizations, and instead seek to unpick how civil society organisations work with, within and against roundtables. We do this, moreover, by situating our analysis within a broader set of macro level considerations about governance and regulation in global perspective that focuses on the deliberative and democratic possibilities (and limits) of roundtables. In particular, we develop and critically evaluate the pragmatist theory of experimentalist governance as a framework for understanding and evaluating Roundtables. While experimentalism offers a number of fruitful avenues for thinking about and practicing deliberative global governance via Rountable we address two limitations. Firstly, the absence of a supportive social background for deliberation implies creative thinking is required with regards to fostering a level of ‘deliberation against’ Roundtables. Secondly, in a related point we raise questions of scale: the mode of regulation via Roundtables privileges quantitative assessment to render commodity chains in ‘singular’ and ‘vertical’ terms. We therefore raise ‘off farm’ issues of how decisions in one commodity sector have implications for others, and, further, how global regulation can overlook local compromises between the environment and agriculture. We therefore conclude by identifying a number of challenges for developing the theory and practice of experimentalist governance.

Item Type:	Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Commodity control, Sustainability, Environmental policy, International cooperation
Series Name:	CSGR Working Papers
Publisher:	University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Place of Publication:	Coventry
Date:	December 2010
Volume:	Vol.2010
Number:	No.271
Number of Pages:	33
Status:	Not Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Description:	Described as Working Paper 270 on pdf but actually is Working Paper 271.
References:	ASEED Europe, Base Investigaciones Sociales, Corporate Europe Observatory Grupo de Reflexión Rural, Rainforest Action Network. 2008. ‘The Roundtable on Ir- Responsible Soy: Certifying Soy Expansion, GM Soy and Agrofuels’, Briefing Paper, April 2008. Available at: http://archive.corporateeurope.org/docs/soygreenwash.pdf BBC. 2004. ‘Soya Boom Threat to South America’, BBC News, 3 September 2005. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3622108.stm Better Sugarcane Initiative (2010) ‘BSI Production Standard’ webpage. Available at: http://www.bettersugarcane.org/assets/BSI%20Production%20Standard%20- %20July%202010%20%28280710%29.pdf Bohman, James (1999) ‘International Regimes and Democratic Governance: Political Equality and Influence in Global Institutions’ International Affairs 75, no. 3, Bohman, James (2007) Democracy Across Borders: From Demos to Demoi, Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press, 2007 Brassett James and William Smith, (2010) Deliberation and Global Civil Society: Agency, Arena, Affect, in Review of International Studies, 36(2): 413-430, Buchanan, Allen and Robert O. Keohane (2006) ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’, Ethics & International Affairs, 20, 405-37. Cochran, Molly (2002) ‘A Democratic Critique of Cosmopolitan Democracy: Pragmatism from the Bottom-Up’, European Journal of International Relations, 8:4, p. 530. Cohen, Joshua and Charles Sabel (1997) ‘Directly Deliberative Polyarchy’European Law Journal, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 313-340. Cohen, Joshua and Charles Sabel (2006) ‘Global Democracy?’ NYU Journal of International Law and Politics. Vol. 37 no. 4: 763-797 CNN. 2009. ‘Government Fights Slave Labor in Brazil. CNN News, 2 January 2009. Available at: http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/americas/01/09/brazil.slavery/index.html?iref=a llsearch Corporate Europe Observatory, Transnational Institute and Grupo de Reflexión Rural. 2007. ‘Paving the Way for Agrofuels: EU Policy, Sustainability Criteria and Climate Calculations’, Joint Discussion Paper, September 2007. Available at: Corporate Europe Observatory. 2009. ‘Sugarcane Ethanol: A Sweet Solution for Europe’s Fuel Addiction?’, CEO Report, February 2009. Available at: http://www.corporateeurope.org/agrofuels/content/2009/02/sugar-cane-ethanol-notso- sweet Dryzek, John S. (2006) Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World Cambridge: Polity Press. Fishkin, James S. (2009) When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy & Public Consultation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Friends of the Earth. 2008a. ‘The Only Responsible Soy is Less Soy’, Friends of the Earth International Statement, 22 April 2008. Available at: http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/forests-and-biodiversity/2008/FoEIRTRS. pdf Friends of the Earth Europe. 2008b. Sustainability as a Smokescreen: The Inadequacy of Certifying Fuels and Feeds’, Friends of the Earth Report, April 2008. Available at: http://www.foeeurope.org/publications/2008/sustainability_smokescreen_fullreport_ med_res.pdf Friends of the Earth, plus 229 other organisations. (2010) ‘Growing Opposition to Round Table on Responsible Soy’, Open Letter, May 2010. Available at: http://lasojamata.iskra.net/files/2010_RTRS%20Letter%20-%20Final-signatures.pdf Gale, F. and Haward, M. (2004) ‘Public Accountability in Private Regulation: Contrasting Models of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and Marine Stewardship Council (MSC)’, Paper prepared for the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Adelaide, Australia, 29 September-1 October 2004. Gerstenburg, Oliver and Charles Sabel (2002) Directly Deliberative Polyarchy: An institutional ideal for Europe?, in Good Governance in Europe's Intergrated Market by Christian Joerges and Renaud Dehousse. Oxford University Press. Gibbon, Peter and Lazaro, Evelyne (2010) ‘Agro-Food Standards and Africa: An Introduction’, in Peter Gibbon, Stefano Ponte and Evelyne Lazaro (eds.) Global Agro- Food Trade and Standards. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Glenn, John (2008) ‘Global Governance and the Democratic Deficit: Stifling the Voice of the South’, Third World Quarterly, 29:2, pp. 217-38. Greenpeace (2008) United Plantations Certified Despite Gross Violations of RSPO Standards. Amsterdam: Greenpeace Netherlands. Greenpeace (2009a) ‘Assessment of the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Fisheries Certification Programme’, Greenpeace Briefing, June 2009. Available at: http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/usa/press-center/reports4/assessment-of-themsc. pdf Greenpeace (2009b) Illegal Land Forest Clearance and RSPO Greenwash: Case Studies of Sinar Mas. London: Greenpeace International. Hickman, M. (2010) ‘Campaign to Save Tropical Forests Failed by Food Giants’, The Independent, 25 January. Higgott, Richard (2000) ‘Contested Globalisation: the Changing Context and Normative Challenges’, Review of International Studies, 26, pp. 131–53. Higgott, Richard and Eva Erman (2010) ‘Deliberative global governance and the question of legitimacy: what can we learn from the WTO?’, Review of International Studies, 36:449-470 Jacquet, Jennifer, Daniel Pauly, David Ainley, Sidney Holt, Paul Dayton and Jeremy Jackson (2010) ‘Seafood Stewardship in Crisis’, Nature, 467, pp. 28-29. Meyer, David S. and Sydney Tarrow (1998) ‘A Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century’, in David S. Meyer and Sydney Tarrow (eds.) The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 1-28. Miller, David (2000) Citizenship and National Identity, Cambridge: Polity Nanz, Patrizia and Jens Steffek (2005) ‘Global Governance, Participation and the Public Sphere’, in David Held and Mathias Koenig-Archibugi (eds.) Global Governance and Public Accountability, Cambridge: Polity, pp. 190-211. Ponte, S. (2008) ‘Greener than Thou: The Political Economy of Fish Ecolabelling and Its Local Manifestations in South Africa’, World Development, 36: 1, pp. 159-175. Round Table on Responsible Association (2010) ‘RTRS Standard – Version 1’ webpage. Available at: http://www.responsiblesoy.org/ Roundtable for a Sustainable Cocoa Economy (2009) Report of the Second Roundtable for a Sustainable Cocoa Economy (RSCE2). Available at: http://www.roundtablecocoa.org/showpage.asp?Reportrsce2 Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (2007) ‘RSPO Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Palm Oil Production’ webpage. Available at: http://www.rspo.org/sites/default/files/RSPO%20Principles%20&%20Criteria.pdf Sabel, Charles (2004) ‘Beyond Principal-Agent Governance: Experimentalist Organizations, Learning and Accountability’, in Ewald Engelen & Monika Sie Dhian Ho (eds.), De Staat van de Democratie. Democratie voorbij de Staat. WRR Verkenning 3 Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, (2004): 173-195 Sabel, Charles and Jonathan Zeitlin (2008) ‘Learning from Difference: the New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union’, European Law Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3, May, pp. 271–327. Scherer, A. G. and Palazzo, G. (2008) ‘Globalization and Corporate Social Responsibility’, in Cane, A. et. al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Smith, William (2010) ‘Civil Disobedience and the Public Sphere’, The Journal of Political Philosophy, online early, no. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00365.x Smith, William and James Brassett (2008) ‘Deliberation and Global Governance: Liberal, Cosmopolitan and Critical Perspectives' in Ethics and International Affairs, 22:1, pp. 69-92, The Economist. (2010) ‘The Other Oil Spill: The Campaign Against Palm Oil’, The Economist, 24 July. WWF. 2010. ‘Certification and Roundtables: Do They Work?’ WWF Report, September 2010. Available at: http://assets.panda.org/downloads/wwf_msireview_sept_2010_lowres.pdf Zhou, R. 2010. ‘Greenwashing the Palm Oil Industry’, Reportage/Enviro, 3 February 2010.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/42941

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item