Barlow, Jane, 1962-, Davis, Hilton, McIntosh, Emma, Kirkpatrick, Sue, Peters, Rebecca, Jarrett, Patricia and Stewart-Brown, Sarah L. (2008) The Oxfordshire home visiting study : 3 year follow-up. Oxford: University of Oxford. Dept. of Public Health. Health Economics Research Centre. (Home Visiting Trial and Follow-up.

Preview

PDF WRAP_Barlow_200312-3-year_follow-up_report_november_2008-9_2_submitted_to_wrap.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (641Kb)

Abstract

Background The Oxfordshire Home Visiting Study is one of the few UK-based randomised controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness of a professionally delivered, intensive home visiting programme beginning during the antenatal period, in improving parenting and child outcomes including the prevention of abuse and neglect. Method One hundred and thirty-one high-risk women registered with 40 GP practices across two counties were randomly allocated to receive intensive home visiting (n=68) or standard services (n=63). Women in the home visiting arm received weekly visits by specially trained health visitors beginning during the second trimester of pregnancy and continuing for a period of 18 months. All mothers and babies were followed up at 2-months, 6-months, and 12-months, and these results have been published elsewhere (McIntosh et al 2009; Barlow et al 2007; Kirkpatrick et al 2007; McIntosh and Barlow 2006; Barlow et al 2005; Brocklehurst et al 2004). This report summarises the results of the 3-year follow-up of 131 women – Intervention group (n=51) and control group (n=46). Results Primary and secondary outcomes The significant improvement in maternal sensitivity and infant co-operativeness that was identified at 12-month follow-up was not maintained at 3-years. The few significant differences between the intervention and control group for the remaining outcomes favoured the control group, although many non-significant findings favoured the intervention group. Child abuse data Non-significant trends were identified suggesting that children in the intervention group who suffered maltreatment were more likely to be identified, and more likely to suffer maltreatment for shorter periods of time. These differences may be clinically important, and may have reached statistical significance in a larger trial. Economic Evaluation The results suggest that intensive home visiting improved maternal sensitivity at 12-months and better enabled health visitors to identify infants in need of further protection at an incremental cost of £3,985 (95% bootstrapped CI for the cost difference: £192 - £5,297) per woman at 36 months. Looking at the ‘health service only’ costs, at 36-months the incremental cost was £4,232 (95% bootstrapped CI for the cost difference: £1,949 - £5,709). The extent to which these potential benefits are worth the costs, however, is a matter of judgment. User perspectives The majority of participants who were interviewed continued to view the home visiting service, in positive terms. Most were highly appreciative of the help and support they had received at the time, and reported significant ways in which they perceived the service to have been of help to them. Longer-term benefits included the close bond that they felt they had established with the study child, the introduction of parenting practices that helped them to address difficult behaviour, and a better ability to utilize other health services. However, only half of the women invited to take part in a 3-year follow-up interview accepted, and the views expressed in these interviews may not therefore be representative of the wider group of women who received the home visiting service. Conclusion This study did not identify any quantitative benefits from an eighteen-month intensive home visiting programme, and given the success of some other programmes of this nature, it seems likely that this may have been due to the duration of the programme (many of the most effective programmes continue until the infant is 2-years of age), and the content of the visits (the lack of focus on specific child developmental outcomes), in conjunction with the fact that this study recruited a very high-risk group of women; just under a half of the sample were known to Child and Family Services by the time the child was three years of age. However, data from in-depth interviews that were conducted with a range of stakeholders at both 12- and 36-months suggests that the partnership model of working that was provided to health visitors was effective in enabling the home visitors to gain the trust of a group of very vulnerable women, many of whom viewed all professionals very negatively, and that many of the participating women also felt that the service had had an ongoing impact in terms of their ability to parent, and their relationship with the study child. Effective interventions for this very high-risk group of mothers and infants have yet to be identified, and will most probably involve the use of more intensive therapeutic interventions such as parent-infant psychotherapy (ref) or mentalisation-based parenting programmes (ref) or a multimodal approach that combines a number of these strategies. In the absence of effective interventions, early identification of infants in need of removal from the home remains the optimal strategy, and the data from this study suggest that home visited children were much more likely to be identified as abused, and more likely to suffer maltreatment for shorter periods of time. These findings may be particularly significant given what we now know about the impact of abuse during the first few years of life. While the findings of the economic analysis suggest that the costs of an intensive intervention of this nature are always likely to be significantly more, society must ultimately decide whether such additional costs are worthwhile.

Item Type:	Report
Subjects:	R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Divisions:	Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Mental Health and Wellbeing Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Home-based family services -- England -- Oxford, Maternal health services -- England -- Oxford, Visiting nurses -- England -- Oxford
Series Name:	Home Visiting Trial and Follow-up
Publisher:	University of Oxford. Dept. of Public Health. Health Economics Research Centre
Place of Publication:	Oxford
Date:	November 2008
Number of Pages:	84
Status:	Not Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	Nuffield Foundation (NF), Great Britain. Dept. of Health (DoH)
References:	Abidin RR (1996). Parenting Stress Index - Manual. Charlottesville, VA: Pediatric Psychology Press. Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van-Ijzendoorn MH, Juffer F (2003). Less is more: Meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood. Psychological-Bulletin 129 (2), 195-215. Barlow J, Davis H, McIntosh E, Jarrett P, Kirkpatrick S, Mockford C et al (2007).The role of home visiting in reducing inequalities in health: Results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. Archives of Disease in Childhood 92(3), 229-233. Barlow J, Kirkpatrick S, Stewart-Brown S, Davis H (2005) 'Hard-to-reach or out-of-reach? Reasons why women refuse to take part in early interventions.', Children And Society, 19 (3), 199 - 210 Bavolek SJ (1990). Research and Validation Report: AAPI. Family Development Resources Inc. Bavolek SJ (1986). Handbook for the Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory. Family Development Resources Inc. Bayley N (1969). Bayley Scales of Infant Development. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp. Beck AT (1972). Depression: Causes and treatment. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. Bradley R, Caldwell B (1979). Home observation for measurement of the environment: A revision of the pre-schoolscale. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 84, 235-244. Briggs A, Clark T, Wolstenholme J, Clarke P (2003). Missing......presumed at random: cost analysis of incomplete data. Health Economics, 12, 377-392. Briggs-Gowan MJ and Carter AS (2001). The Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assesment (BITSEA) Manual. New Haven, CT: Department of Psychology, Yale University. Brocklehurst N, Barlow J, Kirkpatrick S, Davis H, Stewart-Brown S (2004) 'The contribution of health visitors tosupporting vulnerablechildren and families through intensive home visiting', Community Practitioner, 77 (5), 175 - 179. Bull J, McCormick G, Swann C, Mulvihill C (2004). Ante- and post-natal home-visiting programmes: a review of reviews. London: HDA. Burt KB, Van Dulmen MHM, Carlivati J, Egeland B, Sroufe LA, Forman DA et al (2005). Mediating links between maternal depression and offspring psychpathology: the importance of independent data. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry 46(5), 490-499. Byrd ME (1997). A typology of the potential outcomes of maternal child home visits: A literature analysis. Public Health Nursing 14(1), 3-11. Carey WB, McDebitt SC (1978). Revision of the Infant Temperament Questionnaire. Pediatrics, 61(5), 735-739. Cohen NK, Lojkasek M, Muir E, Muir R, Parker CJ (2000). Six-month follow-up of two mother-infant psychotherapies. Infant Mental Health Journal, 4(23), 361-380. Crittenden PM (2001). CARE-Index Infant and Toddlers. Coding Manual. USA: Family Relations Institute. Curtis L. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2007. PSSRU, University of Kent at Canterbury; 2007. Gibaud-Wallston J, Wandersman LP.(1978). Development and utility of the parenting sense of competence scale. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto. Goldberg DP (1981).General Health Questionnaire 28. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson. Gomby D, Culross PL, Behrman RE (1999). Home visiting: recent program evaluatins – analysis and recommendations. The Future of Children 9(1), 4-26. HM Treasury (2003). The Green Book. London. The Stationery Office, HMSO. Jerusalem M, Schwarzer R (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In R Schwarzer (Ed) Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 195-213). Washington, DC: Hemisphere. Kirkpatrick S, Barlow J, Davis S, Stewart-Brown S (2007) 'Working in Partnership: Vulnerable women’s perceptions of health visitors following participation in an intensive home visiting study', Child Abuse Review,16 (1), 3-46. Legal Aid Costs; http://www.scotland.gov.uk/cru/kd01/purple/pdso-02.pdf McAuley C, Knapp M, Beecham J, McCurry and Sleed (2004). Evaluating the Outcomes and Costs of Home-Start Support to Young Families Experiencing Stress:A Comparative Cross Nation Study. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. McIntosh E, Barlow J (2006). The costs of an Intensive Home Visiting Intervention for Vulnerable Families. In: Netten A, Curtis L, editors. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2006. PSSRU, University of Kent at Canterbury. McIntosh E, Barlow J, Stewart-Brown S (2009). Economic evaluation of an intensive home visiting programme: A cost-effectiveness analysis from a societal perspective. Journal of Public Health, 31(3), 423-433. Morrell CJ, Siby H, Sewart P, Walters S Morgan A (2000). Costs and effectiveness of community postnatal support workers: randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal 321, 593-8. Netten A, Curtis L (2004). Unit Costs of Health and Social Care. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent at Canterbury. New NHS 2004 reference costs. http://www.dh.gov.uk, 2004. NHS Reference costs 2007/8. Department of Health . 2008. Ref Type: Internet Communication Olds DL, Eckenrode J, Henderson CR, Kitzman H, Powers J, Cole R et al (1997). Long term effects of home visitation on maternal life course and child abuse and neglect: Fifteen-year follow up of a randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(8), 637-643. Olds DL, Kitzman H (1993). Review of Research on Home-visiting for pregnant women and parents of young children. The Future of children (3)3, 53-91. Olds DL, Henderson C, Tatelbaum R, Chamberline R (1986). Preventing child abuse and neglect: A randomised trial of nurse home visitation. Pediatrics 78, 65-78. Pridham KF, Chang AS (1989). What Being the Parent of a Baby is Like: Revision of an instrument. Research Nursing Health 12(5), 323-329. Rust J, Bennum I, Crowe M, Golombok S (1998).The Golombok Rust Inventory of Marital State, NFER-Nelson Windsor. Sarason IG, Levine HM, Basham RB, Sarason BR (1983). Assessing social support: the Social Support Questionnaire. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology 44,127-139. Slade, A., Sadler, L., de Dios-Kenn, C., Webb, D., Currier-Ezepchick J. and Mayes, L. (2005) Minding the Baby: A Reflective Parenting Program. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 60: 74-100. Sroufe LA. Emotional development: the organisation of emotional development in the early years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. Terry DJ (1991). Stress, coping and adaptation to new parenthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 8, 527-547. Wiggins M, Oakley A, Roberts I, Turner H, Rajan L, Austerberry H, Mujica R, Mugford M. (2004 ) Postnatal support for mothers living in disadvantaged areas: a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/43244

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item