Gleeson, Denis, Abbott, Ian, 1955- and Hill, Ron. (2011) Governing the governors : a case study of college governance in English further education. British Educational Research Journal, Vol.37 (No.5). pp. 781-796. ISSN 0141-1926

Preview

PDF WRAP_Gleson_-governing_the_governors_in_fe_file_for_review_revision_for_wrap_160211.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (286Kb)

Abstract

This paper addresses the nature of governors in the governance of further education colleges in an English context (1). It explores the complex relationship between governors (people/agency), government (policy/structure) and governance (practice), in a college environment. While recent research has focused on the governance of schooling and higher education there has been little attention paid to the role of governors in the lifelong learning sector. The objective of the paper is to contribute to the debate about the purpose of college governance at a time when the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) commissioning era ends, and new government bodies responsible for further education and training, including local authorities, arrive. The paper analyses the nature of FE governance through the perspectives and experiences of governors, as colleges respond to calls from government for greater improvement and accountability in the sector (LSIS, 2009a). What constitutes creative governance is complex and controversial in the wider framework of regulation and public policy reform (Stoker, 1997; Seddon, 2008). As with other tricky concepts such as leadership, professionalism and learning, college governance is best defined in the contexts, cultures and situations in which it is located. College governance does not operate in a vacuum. It involves governors, chairs, principals, professionals, senior managers, clerks, community, business and wider agencies, including external audit and inspection regimes. Governance also acts as a prism through which national education and training reforms are mediated, at local level. While governing bodies are traditionally associated with the business of FE - steering, setting the tone and style, dealing with finance, funding, audit and procedural matters – they are increasingly being challenged to be more creative and responsive to the wider society. Drawing on a recent case study of six colleges, involving governors and key policy stakeholders, this paper explores FE governance in a fast changing policy environment.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute of Education
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	School board members -- Great Britain, High schools -- Administration, Continuing education -- Administration
Journal or Publication Title:	British Educational Research Journal
Publisher:	Routledge
ISSN:	0141-1926
Date:	2011
Volume:	Vol.37
Number:	No.5
Page Range:	pp. 781-796
Identification Number:	10.1080/01411926.2010.495765
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder:	Great Britain. Learning and Skills Improvement Service (LSIS)
References:	Authors (1999) By Appointment: Governance, Markets and Managerialism in Further Education. British Education Research Journal. Vol., 25, No. 4, pp547-563. Authors, (2006) Challenging Dualism; professionalism in ‘troubled times.) Sociology. 41 Spring 277-295. Authors. (2006) The learning leader in Further Education. Centre for Education and Leadership. Lancaster University. Authors, ( 2007) Reluctant Leaders in Further Education. (with Knights) Leadership. Vol 4, 49-72. Authors (2009) Creative Governance in Further Education :the art of the possible? Learning and Skills Improvement Service (LSIS. http:// www.lsis.org.uk). Ball, S. (2008) New Philanthropy,New Networks and New Governance in Education. Political Studies 56, 747-765. Basadur, M. (2004) Leading others to think innovatively together:creative leadership – Leadership Quarterly 15(1) 103-21. Cabinet Office (2008) Excellence and Fairness: achieving world class public services. HMSO. Carver, J. (1997) Boards That Make a Difference. Jossey-Bass SanFrancisco. Clarke. J. ( 2004) Dissolving the Public Realm? The logic and limits of neo-liberalism. Int Soc Pol. 33. 1-27. Coffield, F. (2008) Just Suppose Teaching and Learning Became the First Priority. UCU, October 2008. Coffield, F. et. al. (2007) A Seismic Shift? Policy perspectives on the changing learning and skills landscape. Working paper 6 ESRC/TLRP Programme. Institute of Education: London. Collinson, M. and Collinson, D. (2005) Leadership Challenges. CEL Working Paper Series. Lancaster University Centre for Excellence in Leadership (CEL). Cresswell, J. W. (2003)Research Design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach. Sage: London. Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (2007) Instrument and Articles of Government DIUS. London. Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (2008) Further Education Colleges – Models for Success. DIUS: London. Foster, A. (2005) Realising the potential .A review of the future role of further education colleges .Annesley, UK DFES Publications. Grint, K. (2000) The Arts of Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Grint, K. (2005) Leadership: limits and possibilities. Palgrave MacMillan. Guardian Newspaper (2009) The Governor: Paying volunteers would undermine a successful structure. The Education Guardian 17/3/09 EducationGuardian.co.uk/governor. Harris, A. (2009) Creative Leadership :Developing Future Leaders – Management in Education. Vol. 23, (1), 9 – 11. Hartas, D. (2010) Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Educational Research. London: Continuum. Hill, R. and James, I. (2007) Developing and Implementing Quality Improvement Practices for College Governance. CEL Practitioner Research Projects. Hill, R. and James, I. (2008) Developing and Implementing a Model of Strategic College Governance. CEL Practitioner Research Project. Hodgson, A. and Spours, K. (2008) Education and Training: 14-19. London: Sage. House of Commons (2009) . Re-skilling for recovery; After Leitch, implementing skills and training policies. Vol.1. House of Commons Innovation, Universities,Science and Skills Committee. January. London: The Stationery Office Ltd. Hoyle, E. and Wallace, M. (2005) Educational Leadership :Ambiguity, Professionals and Managerialism London: Sage. Langlands Report (2004) – The good standard for the public service. OPM-CIPFA: London. James D. and Biesta G. (2007) Improving Learning Cultures in Further Education. London: Routledge Falmer. Leitch, S. (2006) Prosperity for all in the global economy: World Class Skills. Final Report. London: HM Treasury. Learning and Skills Improvement Service (2009a) A Review of Governance Across the FE System. (LSIS forthcoming). Learning and Skills Improvement Service. (2009b) Leadership Skills for Development. Governance. News Letter 9, Spring Term. Coventry and London: LSIS. McCulloch, G. (2004) Documentary Research in Education: History and the Social Sciences. London: Routledge. Murray. M. (2009) Exploring the Leadership and governance implications of self-regulation for local authority and third sector providers of adult learning and skills. Leicester: NIACE.. Montuori, A. and Purser, R.E. (1999) – Social Creativity, Vol 1 Hampton Press. National Audit Office (2008) Partnerships and organizations involved in the improvement of England’s skills base. Appendices 1-4 supplied by NAO to House of Commons Select Committee (2008/9), pp.96-111, op cit. Nuffield Review (2008) Review of 14-19 Education and Training. Final Report. London: Nuffield Foundation. OfSTED (2008) How Colleges Improve : A review of effective practice London: OFSTED. Office for Public Management (2007) Going forward with good governance. London: HMSO. Ranson, S (2008) The changing governance of education. Journal of Educational Management, Administration and Leadership Vol 36 No 2 April 2008 Rhodes, R.A.W.(1997) Understanding Governance: policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Schofield, A. (2009) What is an effective and high performing governing body in UK Higher Education? Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. Schofield, A. (2009) A Review of Governance and Strategic Leadership in English Further Education. London: AOC/LSIS. Seddon, J (2008) Systems Thinking in the Public Sector. Axminster: Triarchy Press Sen, A. (2008) Capitalism Beyond the Crisis. New York Review of Books. March. Silverman, D. (2001) Interpreting Qualitative Data. London: Sage. Stoker, G. (1997) Local Governance. Public Administration, 75, P6. Spillane, J.P. and Diamond ( 2007) Distributed Leadership in Practice. Teachers College Press: New York. Stoll, L. (2008) Creative Leadership : A challenge of our times. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York. Universities College Union. (2010) UCU Campaigns Update.19/2/10. UCU. West-Burnham, J. (2008) Creative Leadership. Paper presented at the International Symposium on the Art of Creative Leadership, Bali.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/4340

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item