Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Blood pressure control by home monitoring : meta-analysis of randomised trials

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Cappuccio, Francesco P., Kerry, Sally M., Forbes, Lindsay and Donald, Anna. (2004) Blood pressure control by home monitoring : meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ, Vol.329 (No.7458). ISSN 0959-535X

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Cappuccio_Blood_Pressure_BMJ.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (175Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38121.684410.AE

Abstract

Objective To determine the effect of home blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure levels and proportion of people with essential hypertension achieving targets. Design Meta-analysis of 18 randomised controlled trials. Participants 1359 people with essential hypertension allocated to home blood pressure monitoring and 1355 allocated to the "control" group seen in the healthcare system for 2-36 months. Main outcome measures Differences in systolic (13 studies), diastolic (16 studies), or mean (3 studies) blood pressures, and proportion of patients achieving targets (6 studies), between intervention and control groups. Results Systolic blood pressure was lower in people with hypertension who had home blood pressure monitoring than in those who had standard blood pressure monitoring in the healthcare system (standardised mean difference 4.2 (95% confidence interval 1.5 to 6.9) mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure was lower by 2.4 (1.2 to 3.5) mm Hg, and mean blood pressure was lower by 4.4 (2.0 to 6.8) mm Hg. The relative risk of blood pressure above predetermined targets was lower in people with home blood pressure monitoring (risk ratio 0.90, 0.80 to 1.00). When publication bias was allowed for, the differences were attenuated: 2.2 ( − 0.9 to 5.3) mm Hg for systolic blood pressure and 1.9 (0.6 to 3.2) mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure. Conclusions Blood pressure control in people with hypertension (assessed in the clinic) and the proportion achieving targets are increased when home blood pressure monitoring is used rather than standard blood pressure monitoring in the healthcare system. The reasons for this are not clear. The difference in blood pressure control between the two methods is small but likely to contribute to an important reduction in vascular complications in the hypertensive population.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QP Physiology
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Blood pressure -- Measurement, Hypertension, Home care services, Patient self-monitoring
Journal or Publication Title: BMJ
Publisher: BMJ Group
ISSN: 0959-535X
Date: 2004
Volume: Vol.329
Number: No.7458
Identification Number: 10.1136/bmj.38121.684410.AE
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Bristol-Meyers Squibb
References: 1 Collins R, Peto R, MacMahon S, Hebert P, Fiebach NH, Eberlein KA, et al. Blood pressure, stroke and coronary heart disease. II. Short term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context. Lancet 1990;335:827-38. 2 MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J, Collins R, Sorlie P, Neaton J, et al. Blood pressure, stroke and coronary heart disease. I. Effect of prolonged differences in blood pressure: evidence from nine prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet 1990;335:765-74. 3 Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002;360:1903-13. 4 Prospective Studies Collaboration. Cholesterol, diastolic blood pressure, and stroke: 13,000 strokes in 450,000 people in 45 prospective cohorts. Lancet 1995;346:1647-53. 5 Primatesta P, Brookes M, Poulter NR. Improved hypertension management and control: results from the health survey for England 1998. Hypertension 2001;38:827-32. 6 Du X, Cruickshank K, McNamee R, Saraee M, Sourbutts J, Summers A, et al. Case-control study of stroke and the quality of hypertension control in north west England. BMJ 1997;314:272-6. 7 Yarows SA, Staessen JA. How to use home blood pressure monitors in clinical practice. Am J Hypertens 2002;15:93-6. 8 Yarows SA, Julius S, Pickering TG. Home blood pressure monitoring. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1251-7. 9 Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003;289:2560-71. 10 Rickerby J. The role of home blood pressure measurement in managing hypertension: an evidence-based review. J Hum Hypertens 2002;16:469-72. 11 CartwrightW, Dalton KJ, Swindells H, Rushant S, Mooney P. Objective measurement of anxiety in hypertensive pregnant women managed in hospital and in the community. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:182-5. 12 Glanz K, Kirscht JP, Rosenstock IM. Linking research and practice in patient education for hypertension: patient responses to four educational interventions. Med Care 1981;19:141-52. 13 Ross-McGill H, Hewison J, Hirst J,Dowswell T, Holt A, Brunskill P, et al. Antenatal home blood pressure monitoring: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;107:217-21. 14 Carnahan.JE, Nugent CA. The effects of self monitoring by patients on the control of hypertension. Am J Med Sci 1975;269:69-73. 15 Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Gibson ES, Taylor DW, Hackett BC, Roberts RS, et al. Improvement of medication compliance in uncontrolled hypertension. Lancet 1976;i:1265-8. 16 Johnson AL, Taylor DW, Sackett DL, Dunnett CW, Shimizu AG. Self-recording of blood pressure in the management of hypertension. CMAJ 1978;119:1034-9. 17 Earp JA, Ory MG, Strogatz DS. The effects of family involvement and practitioner home visits on the control of hypertension. Am J Public Health 1982;72:1146-54. 18 Pierce JP,Watson DS, Knights S, Gliddon T, Williams S,Watson R. A controlled trial of health education in the physician’s office. Prev Med 1984;13:185-94. 19 Stahl SM, Kelley CR, Neill PJ, Grim CE, Mamlin J. Effects of home blood pressure measurement on long-term BP control. Am J Public Health 1984;74:704-9. 20 Binstock ML, Franklin KL. A comparison of compliance techniques on the control of high blood pressure. Am J Hypertens 1988;1:192-4S. 21 Midanik LT, Resnick B, Hurley LB, Smith EJ, McCarthy M. Home blood pressure monitoring for mild hypertensives. Public Health Rep 1991;106:85-9. 22 Soghikian K, Casper SM, Fireman BH, Hunkeler EM, Hurley LB, Tekawa IS, et al. Home blood pressure monitoring: effect on use of medical services and medical care costs. Med Care 1992;30:855-65. 23 Muhlhauser I, Sawicki PT, Didjurgeit U, Jorgens V, Trampisch HJ, Berger M. Evaluation of a structured treatment and teaching programme on hypertension in general practice. Clin Exp Hypertens 1993;15:125-42. 24 Friedman RH, Kazis LE, Jette A, Smith MB, Stollerman J, Torgerson J, et al. A telecommunications system for monitoring and counseling patients with hypertension: impact on medication adherence and blood pressure control. Am J Hypertens 1996;9:285-92. 25 Zarnke KB, Feagan BG, Mahon JL, Feldman RD. A randomized study comparing a patient-directed hypertension management strategy with usual office-based care. Am J Hypertens 1997;10:58-67. 26 Bailey B, Carney SL, Gillies AA, Smith AJ. Antihypertensive drug treatment: a comparison of usual care with self blood pressure measurement. J Hum Hypertens 1999;13:147-50. 27 Mehos BM, Saseen JJ, MacLaughlin EJ. Effect of pharmacist intervention and initiation of home blood pressure monitoring in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Pharmacotherapy 2000;20:1384-9. 28 Vetter W, Hess L, Brignoli R. Influence of self-measurement of blood pressure on the responder rate in hypertensive patients treated with losartan: results of the SVATCH study. J Hum Hypertens 2000;14:235-41. 29 Artinian NT, Washington OG, Templin TN. Effects of home telemonitoring and community-based monitoring on blood pressure control in urban African Americans: a pilot study. Heart Lung 2001;30:191-9. 30 Broege PA, James GD, Pickering TG. Management of hypertension in the elderly using home blood pressures. Blood Press Monit 2001;6:139-44. 31 Rogers MA, Small D, Buchan DA, Butch CA, Stewart CM, Krenzer BE, et al. Home monitoring service improves mean arterial pressure in patients with essential hypertension: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:1024-32. 32 Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629-34. 33 Sutton AJ, Song F, Gilbody SM, Abrams KR. Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review. Stat Methods Med Res 2000;9:421-45. 34 Sutton AJ, Duval SJ, Tweedie RL, Abrams KR, Jones DR. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. BMJ 2000;320:1574-7. 35 Aylett M, Marples G, Jones K. Home blood pressure monitoring: its effect on the management of hypertension in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 1999;49:725-8. 36 Brueren MM, Schouten HJA, de Leeuw PW, van Montfrans GA, van Ree JW. A series of self-measurements by the patient is a reliable alternative to ambulatory blood pressure measurement. Br J Gen Pract 1998;48:1585-9. 37 Nordmann A, Frach B,Walker T, Martina B, Battegay E. Reliability of patients measuring blood pressure at home: prospective observational study. BMJ 1999;319:1172. 38 Little P, Barnett J, Barnsley L, Marjoram J, Fitzgerald-Barron A, Mant D. Comparison of agreement between different measures of blood pressure in primary care and daytime ambulatory blood pressure. BMJ 2002;325:254. 39 Little P, Barnett J, Barnsley L, Marjoram J, Fitzgerald-Barron A, Mant D. Comparison of acceptability of and preferences for different methods of measuring blood pressure in primary care. BMJ 2002;325:258-9. 40 Staessen JA, Den Hond E, Celis H, Fagard R, Keary L, Vandenhoven G, et al. Antihypertensive treatment based on blood pressure measurement at home or in the physician’s office. JAMA 2004;291:955-64. 41 Williams B, Poulter NR, Brown MJ, Davis M, McInnes GT, Potter JF, et al. Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the fourth working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004—BHS IV. J Hum Hypertens 2004;18:139-85.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/4349

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us