The Library
Learning through online discussion: a case of triangulation in research
Tools
Hammond, Michael and Wiriyapinit, Mongkolchai . (2005) Learning through online discussion: a case of triangulation in research. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (Online Edition), Vol.21 (No.3). pp. 283-302. ISSN 1449-5554
|
PDF
WRAP_Hammond_AJET_21_3.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (187Kb) |
Official URL: http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet21/hammond.htm...
Abstract
This paper reports on issues in carrying out research into online discussion. The context is a study of a distance learning module within an MBA program. The module required students to tackle problems based on real life scenarios within small online groups. Students were studying part time and shared similar professional backgrounds. The research looked at students' overall evaluation of the module, ways in which group work was conducted, and the contribution of the tutor. The approach taken was an interpretive case study using questionnaire survey, text analysis and interviews. The main findings from the study are reported, but the focus is on the strengths of, and difficulties in, using the research methods. Triangulation of methods provides the researcher with a greater degree of confidence in reporting findings, although subjective interpretation is still needed.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | L Education > LB Theory and practice of education |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute of Education |
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Electronic discussion groups, Distance education, Group work in education |
| Journal or Publication Title: | Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (Online Edition) |
| Publisher: | ASCILITE |
| ISSN: | 1449-5554 |
| Date: | 16 September 2005 |
| Volume: | Vol.21 |
| Number: | No.3 |
| Page Range: | pp. 283-302 |
| Status: | Peer Reviewed |
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access |
| References: | Åhlberg, M., Kaasinen, A., Kaivola, T. & Houtsonen, L. (2001). Collaborative knowledge building to promote in-service teacher training in environmental education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 10(3), 227-238. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R. & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teacher presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v5n2/v5n2_anderson.asp Angeli, C., Valanides, N. & Bonk, C. (2003). Communication in a web-based conferencing system: the quality of computer-mediated interactions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 31-43. Aviv, R. (2000). Educational performance of ALN via content analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2), 53-72. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v4n2/v4n2_aviv.asp Aviv, R. Erlich, Z., Ravid, G. & Geva, A. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 1-23. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n3/v7n3_aviv.asp Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2003). Asynchronous discussion groups in teacher training classes: Perceptions of native and non-native students. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 24-46. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n3/v7n3_biesenbach-lucas.asp Boder, A. (1992). The process of knowledge reification. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 8(3), 177-185. Brett, C. (2004). Off-line actors contributing to online engagement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(1), 83-95. Brown, R. (2001). The process of community-building in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 18-35. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v5n2/v5n2_brown.asp Carswell, L., Thomas, P., Petre, M., Price, B. & Richards, M. (2000). Distance education via the Internet: The student experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 29-46. Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1989). Research methods in education. London, Routledge. Collings, P. & Pearce, J. (2002). Sharing designer and user perspectives of web site evaluation: A cross-campus collaborative learning experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 267-278. Cook, D. and Ralston, J. (2003). Sharpening the focus: Methodological issues in analsysing on line conferences. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(3), 361-376. Cunningham-Atkins, H., Powell, N., Moore, D., Hobbs, D. & Sharpe, S. (2004). The role of cognitive style in educational computer conferencing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 69-80. Curtis, D. & Lawson, M. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 21-34. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v5n1/v5n1_curtis.asp De Abreu Moreira, D. & Quintino Da Silva, E. (2003). A method to increase student interaction using student groups and peer review over the Internet. Education and Information Technologies, 8(1), 47-54. de Corte, E. (2003). Powerful learning environments. Pergamon, Oxford, UK. Denzin, N.K. (1997). Triangulation in educational research. In P. Keeves (Ed), Educational research methodology and measurement: An international handbook. Pergamon Press, UK. Entwistle, N. J. & Ramsden, R. (1983). Understanding student learning. London, Croom Helm. Galanouli, D. & Collins, J. (2000). Using unmediated computer conferencing to promote reflective practice and confidence-building in initial teacher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 9(2), 237-254. Garrison, D. R. & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London, Routledge Falmer. Glaser, B. G. & A. L. Strauss (1968). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Graddy, D. (2004). Gender and online discourse in the principles of economics. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(4), 1-12. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v8n4/v8n4_graddy.asp Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C. & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431. Hammond, M. (1999). Issues associated with participation in on line forums: the case of the communicative learner. Education and Information Technologies, 4(4), 353-367. Harasim, L. (1989). Online education: a new domain. In R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds), Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education. Oxford, Pergamon Press, 50-62. Hawkey, K. (2003). Asynchronous text-based discussion: A case study with trainee teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 8(2), 165-177. Heckman, R. & Annabi, H. (2005). A content analytic comparison of learning processes in online and face-to-face case study discussions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/heckman.html Henri, F. (1991). Computer conferencing and context analysis. In A. Kaye (Ed), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Hew, K. F. & Cheung, W. S. (2003). Models to evaluate online learning communities of asynchronous discussion forums. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(2), 241-259. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet19/hew.html Hiltz, R., Coppola, N., Rotter, N., Turoff, M. & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2000). Measuring the importance of collaborative learning for the effectiveness of ALN. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2), 103-125. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v4n2/v4n2_hiltz.asp Hubscher-Younger, T. & Narayanan, N. (2003). Authority and convergence in collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 41, 313-334. Johnson, S., Suriya, C., Won Yoon, S., Berret J. & La Fleur, J. (2002). Team development and group processes of virtual teams. Computers and Education, 39, 379-393. Jones, C. & Asensio, M. (2001). Experiences of assessment using phenomenography for evaluation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(3), 306-313. Koory, M. (2003). Differences in learning outcomes for the online and F2F versions of an introduction to Shakespeare. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(2), 18-34. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n2/v7n2_koory.asp Kumari, D. (2001). Connecting graduate students to virtual guests through asynchronous discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 53-63. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v5n2/v5n2_kumari.asp Light, P., Nesbitt, E., Light, V. & White, S. (2000). Variety is the spice of life, student use of CMC in the context of campus based study. Computers and Education, 34, 257-267. Lindblom-Ylänne, S. & Pihlajamäki, H. (2003). Can a collaborative network environment enhance essay-writing processes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 17-30. Lockhorst, D., Admiraal, W., Pilot, A. & Veen, W. (2002). Design elements for a CSCL environment in a teacher training programme. Education and Information Technologies, 7(4), 377-384. Macdonald, J. & Twining, P. (2002). Assessing activity-based learning for a networked course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 603-618. Martinez A, Dimitriades, Y, Rubia, B, Gomez, E. & de la Fuente, P. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom interactions. Computers and Education, 41, 355-368. Mason, R. (1991). Methodologies for evaluating applications of computer conferencing. In A.R. Kaye (Ed), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Mason, R. & Kaye, A. (Eds) (1989). Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education. Oxford, Pergamon Press. Massey, A. (1999). Methodological triangulation, or how to get lost without being found out. Studies in Educational Ethnography, 2, 183-197. Mazzolini, M. & Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in on line discussion forums. Computers and Education, 40, 237-253. McCabe, M. F. (1998). Lessons from the field: computer conferencing in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 7(1), 71-87 McConnell, D. (2000). Implementing computer supported cooperative learning. London, Kogan Page. McLoughlin, C. (2002). Computer supported teamwork: An integrative approach to evaluating cooperative learning in an online environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 227-254. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet18/mcloughlin.html Meyer, K. (2003). Face to face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 55-65. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n3/v7n3_meyer.asp Miller, D. & Ewing, J. (2000). Beyond knowledge transmission? Computer-supported learning in teacher education: some benefits in terms of stress, control and self-belief. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 9(3), 363-376. Morse, K. (2003). Does one size fit all? Exploring asynchronous learning in a multicultural environment. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 37-5. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n1/v7n1_morse.asp Oliver, M. & Shaw, G. (2003). Asynchronous discussion in support of medical education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 56-67. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n1/v7n1_oliver.asp O'Regan, K. (2003). Emotion and e-learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 78-92. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n3/v7n3_oregan.asp Parker, D. & Gemino, A. (2001). Inside on-line learning: Comparing conceptual and technique learning performance in place-based and ALN formats. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 64-92. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v5n2/v5n2_parkergemino.asp Putz, P. & Arnold, P. (2001). Communities of practice: Guidelines for the design of online seminars in higher education. Education, Communication and Information, 1(2), 181-195. Robson, C. (1993). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford, Blackwell. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R. & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8-22. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferences. Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 51-70. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London, Routledge. Salmon, G. (2002). Mirror, mirror, on my screen: Exploring online reflections. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 379-391. Seabrooks, J., Kenney, S. & LaMontagne, M. (2000). Collaboration and virtual mentoring: Building relationships between pre-service and in-service special education teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 9(2), 219-236. Shaw, G. & Pieter, W. (2000). The use of asynchronous learning networks in nutrition education: Student attitude, experiences and performance. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(1), 40-51. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v4n1/v4n1_shawpieter.asp Snell, R., Hodgson, V. & Mann, S. (Eds) (1987). Beyond distance learning towards open learning. Open University Press, London. Spiceland, D. & Hawkins, C. (2002). The impact on learning of an asynchronous active learning course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 68-75. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v6n1/v6n1_spiceland.asp Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication and Information, 2(1), 23-49. Taylor, J. (2001). Virtual writing forum with Don Murray and the national writing project in an asynchronous environment. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 99-134. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v5n1/v5n1_taylor.asp Thomas, M. (2002). Implementing a CMC tutor group for an existing distance education course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 351-366. Tolmie, A. & Boyle, J. (2000). Factors influencing the success of computer mediated communication (CMC) environments in university teaching: A review and a case study. Computers and Education, 34, 119-140. van Weert, T. & Pilot, A. (2003). Task-based team learning with ICT, design and development of new learning. Education and Information Technologies, 8(2), 195-214. Vandergrift, K. (2002). The anatomy of a distance education course: A case study analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 76-90. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v6n1/v6n1_vandergrift.asp Wallace, R. (2003). Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication and Information, 3(2), 241-280. Watson, G. & Prestridge, S. (2003). A networked learning community approach to sustain teacher ICT professional development. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(2), 227-240. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet19/watson.html Wearmouth, J., Smith A. & Soler J. (2004). Computer conferencing with access to a 'Guest Expert' in the professional development of special educational needs coordinators. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 81-93. Weller, M. (2000). Implementing a CMC tutor group for an existing distance education course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(3), 178-83. White, B. & Le Cornu, R. (2002). Email reducing stress for student teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 7(4), 351-357. Woong Yun, G. & Trumbo, C. (2000). Comparative response to a survey executed by post, e-mail, and web form. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6(1). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/yun.html Yang, H. & Tang, J. (2003). Effects of social network on students' performance: a web based forum study in Taiwan. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 93-107. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n3/v7n3_yang.asp |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/435 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Tools
Tools

