Dale, Jeremy, 1958-, Williams, S., Foster, T., Higgins, J., Snooks, Helen, Crouch, R., Hartley-Sharpe, C., Glucksman, E. and George, S. (Steve). (2004) Safety of telephone consultation for "non-serious" emergency ambulance service patients. BMJ Quality and Safety, Vol.13 (No.5). pp. 363-373. ISSN 2044-5423

Preview

PDF WRAP_Dale_Telephone_consultation.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (227Kb)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the safety of nurses and paramedics offering telephone assessment, triage, and advice as an alternative to immediate ambulance despatch for emergency ambulance service callers classified by lay call takers as presenting with "non-serious" problems (category C calls). Design: Data for this study were collected as part of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial reported elsewhere. The intervention arm of the trial comprised nurse or paramedic telephone consultation using a computerised decision support system to assess, triage, and advise patients whose calls to the emergency ambulance service had been classified as "non-serious" by call takers applying standard priority despatch criteria. A multidisciplinary expert clinical panel reviewed data from ambulance service, accident and emergency department, hospital inpatient and general practice records, and call transcripts for patients triaged by nurses and paramedics into categories that indicated that despatch of an emergency ambulance was unnecessary. All cases for which one or more members of the panel rated that an emergency ambulance should have been despatched were re-reviewed by the entire panel for an assessment of the "life risk" that might have resulted. Setting: Ambulance services in London and the West Midlands, UK. Study population: Of 635 category C patients assessed by nurses and paramedics, 330 (52%) cases that had been triaged as not requiring an emergency ambulance were identified. Main outcome measures: Assessment of safety of triage decisions. Results: Sufficient data were available from the routine clinical records of 239 (72%) subjects to allow review by the specialist panel. For 231 (96.7%) sets of case notes reviewed, the majority of the panel concurred with the nurses’ or paramedics’ triage decision. Following secondary review of the records of the remaining eight patients, only two were rated by the majority as having required an emergency ambulance within 14 minutes. For neither of these did a majority of the panel consider that the patient would have been at "life risk" without an emergency ambulance being immediately despatched. However, the transcripts of these two calls indicated that the correct triage decision had been communicated to the patient, which suggests that the triage decision had been incorrectly entered into the decision support system. Conclusions: Telephone advice may be a safe method of managing many category C callers to 999 ambulance services. A clinical trial of the full implementation of this intervention is needed, large enough to exclude the possibility of rare adverse events.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions:	Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Telephone in medicine, Triage (Medicine) -- Great Britain, Ambulance service -- Great Britain, Emergency medicine -- Decision making -- Computer programs
Journal or Publication Title:	BMJ Quality and Safety
Publisher:	BMJ Group
ISSN:	2044-5423
Date:	2004
Volume:	Vol.13
Number:	No.5
Page Range:	pp. 363-373
Identification Number:	10.1136/qshc.2003.008003
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	NHS Executive. Research and Development Directorate
References:	1 Snooks H, Williams S, Crouch R, et al. NHS emergency response to 999 calls: alternatives for cases that are neither life-threatening nor serious. BMJ 2002;325:330–3. 2 Richards JR, Ferrall SJ. Inappropriate use of emergency medical services transport: comparison of provider and patient perspectives. Acad Emerg Med 1999;6:14–20. 3 Palazzo FF, Warner OJ, Harron M, et al. Misuse of the London ambulance service: how much and why? J Accid Emerg Med 1998;15:368–70. 4 Little GF, Barton D. Inappropriate use of the ambulance service. Eur J Emerg Med 1998;5:307–11. 5 Holm O, Berlac PA, Jensen PK, et al. Relevance of the 112-emergency calls among the clientele of the emergency department of the Herlev hospital admitting office. Ugeskr Laeger 1997;159:1749–51. 6 Chen JC, Bullard MJ, Liaw SJ. Ambulance use, misuse, and unmet needs in a developing emergency medical services system. Eur J Emerg Med 1996;3:73–8. 7 Billitier A, Moscati R, Janicke D, et al. A multi-site survey of factors contributing to medically unnecessary ambulance transports. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:1046–52. 8 Brown E, Sindelar J. The emergent problem of ambulance misuse. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:646–9. 9 Pennycook AG, Makeower RM, Morrison WG. Use of the emergency ambulance service to an inner city accident and emergency department - a comparison of general practitioner and ‘999’ calls. J R Soc Med 1991;84:726–7. 10 Gardner GJ. The use and abuse of the emergency ambulance service: some of the factors affecting the decision whether to call an emergency ambulance. Arch Emerg Med 1990;7:81–9. 11 Kongelf E, Lereim I, Hald K. Requests for ambulances for patients with acute diseases and injuries. Are ambulance services abused? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1989;109:3447–51. 12 O’Leary C, Bury G, McCabe M, et al. Ambulance-user analysis in an accident and emergency department. Ir Med J 1987;80:422–3. 13 Rademaker AW, Powell DG, Read JH. Inappropriate use and unmet need in paramedic and non-paramedic ambulance systems. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:553–6. 14 Morris DL, Cross AB. Is the emergency ambulance service abused? BMJ 1980;3:121–3. 15 Gibson G. Measures of emergency ambulance effectiveness: unmet need and inappropriate use. J Am Coll Emergy Phys 1977;6:389–92. 16 Audit Commission. A life in the fast lane: value for money in emergency ambulance services. Belmont Press, 1998. 17 O’Cathain A, Munro JF, Nicholl JP, et al. How helpful is NHS Direct? Postal survey of callers. BMJ 2000;320:1035. 18 Lattimer V, George S, Thompson F, et al. Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1998;317:1054–9. 19 Dale J, Higgins J, Williams S, et al. Computer-assisted assessment and advice for ‘non-serious’ 999 ambulance service callers: the potential impact on ambulance despatch. Emerg Med J 2003;20:178–83. 20 LASTAP Final Report. The clinical, organisational and cost consequences of computer-assisted telephone advice to category C 999 ambulance service callers: results of a controlled trial. University of Warwick. Available at: http://www.warwick.ac.uk/primary_care/ASTAP-final report.pdf. 21 Delbecq A, Van de Ven A. A group process model for problem identification and program planning. J Appl Behav Sci 1971;7:467–92. 22 Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, et al. Consensus development methods and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess 1998;2(3). 23 Lattimer V, Sassi F, George S, et al. Cost analysis of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: evidence from a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2000;320:1053–7. 24 Thompson F, George S, Lattimer V, et al. Overnight calls in primary care: randomised controlled trial of management using nurse telephone consultation. BMJ 1999;319:1408. 25 Dale J, Green J, Reid F, et al. Primary care in the accident and emergency department: II. comparison of general practitioners and hospital doctors. BMJ 1995;311:427–30. 26 Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, et al. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Publ Health 1984;74:979–83. 27 Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 1995;311:377–80. 28 Lomas J. Words without action? The production, dissemination and impact of consensus recommendations. Ann Rev Publ Health 1991;12:41–65. 29 Scott EA, Black N. When does consensus exist in expert panels? J Publ Health Med 1991;13:35–9. 30 Department of Health. Reforming emergency care. London: Department of Health, 2001.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/4355

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item