Lamb, S. E. (Sallie E.), Bartlett, H. P., Ashley, A. and Bird, W.. (2002) Can lay-led walking programmes increase physical activity in middle aged adults? : a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, Vol.56 . pp. 246-252. ISSN 0143-005X

Preview

PDF WRAP_Lamb_Lay-Led.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (282Kb)

Abstract

Study objective: To compare health walks, a community based lay-led walking scheme versus advice only on physical activity and cardiovascular health status in middle aged adults. Design: Randomised controlled trial with one year follow up. Physical activity was measured by questionnaire. Other measures included attitudes to exercise, body mass index, cholesterol, aerobic capacity, and blood pressure. Setting: Primary care and community. Participants: 260 men and women aged 40–70 years, taking less than 120 minutes of moderate intensity activity per week. Main results: Seventy three per cent of people completed the trial. Of these, the proportion increasing their activity above 120 minutes of moderate intensity activity per week was 22.6% in the advice only and 35.7% in the health walks group at 12 months (between group difference =13% (95% CI 0.003% to 25.9%) p=0.05). Intention to treat analysis, using the last known value for missing cases, demonstrated smaller differences between the groups (between group difference =6% (95% CI -5% to 16.4%)) with the trend in favour of health walks. There were improvements in the total time spent and number of occasions of moderate intensity activity, and aerobic capacity, but no statistically significant differences between the groups. Other cardiovascular risk factors remained unchanged. Conclusions: There were no significant between group differences in self reported physical activity at 12 month follow up when the analysis was by intention to treat. In people who completed the trial, health walks was more effective than giving advice only in increasing moderate intensity activity above 120 minutes per week.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions:	Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Fitness walking -- Great Britain, Middle-aged persons -- Health and hygiene, Self-care, Health
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
Publisher:	BMJ Group
ISSN:	0143-005X
Date:	2002
Volume:	Vol.56
Page Range:	pp. 246-252
Identification Number:	10.1136/jech.56.4.246
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	British Heart Foundation, Great Britain. Countryside Agency
References:	1 Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 1995;273:402–7. 2 Fentem P, Walker, A. Setting targets for England: challenging, measurable and achievable. In: Health Education Authority. Moving on. A report of the Health Education Authority symposium to agree health education messages for promoting physical activity in England. London: Health Education Authority, 1994:58–76. 3 Bartlett H, Howells K, Ashley A. Evaluation of Sonning Common Health Walks Scheme. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Health Care Research and Evaluation, Oxford Brookes University, 1996. 4 Harland J, White M, Drinkwater C, et al. The Newcastle exercise project: a randomised controlled trial of methods to promote physical activity in primary care. BMJ 1999;319:828–32. 5 Steptoe A, Doherty S, Rink E, et al. Behavioural counselling in general practice for the promotion of healthy behaviour among adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease: randomised trial. BMJ 1999;319:943–7 6 Stephens W, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a primary care based physical activity intervention in 45–74 year old men and women: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med 1998;32:236–41. 7 Taylor AH, Doust J, Webborn N. Randomised controlled trial to examine the effects of a GP exercise referral programme in Hailsham, East Sussex, on modifiable coronary heart disease risk factors. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:595–601. 8 Cooper AR, Moore LA, McKenna J, et al. What is the magnitude of blood pressure response to a programme of moderate intensity activity? Randomised controlled trial among sedentary adults with unmedicated hypertension. Br J Gen Pract 2000;50:958–62. 9 Smith BJ, Bauman, AE, Bull, FC, et al. Promoting physical activity in general practice: a controlled trial of written advice and information materials Br J Sports Med 2000;34:262–7. 10 Lamb SE. A postal physical activity questionnaire for the UK population. http://www.hss.coventry.ac.uk/physical activity questionnaire.htm (2001). 11 Sallis JF, Haskell Wl, Wood PD, et al. Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City project. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:91– 106. 12 Bonnefoy M, Normand S, Pachiandi C, et al. Simultaneous validation of 10 physical activity questionnaires in older men: a doubly labeled water study. J Am Geriatric Soc 2001;49:28–35. 13 Marcus BJ, Simpkin C The stages of exercise behaviour. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1993;33:83–8. 14 Siconofi SF, Ewing Garber C, Lasater T, et al. A simple, valid step test for estimating maximal oxygen uptake in epidemiologic studies Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:382–90. 15 Pocock SJ. In: Clinical trials. A practical approach. Chichester: Wiley, 1983:125. 16 Hollis S, Campbell F What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1999;319:670–4. 17 Hakin AA, Petrovich H, Birchfield CN, et al. Effects of walking on mortality among non-smoking retired men. NEJM 1998;338:94–9. 18 Tudor-Locke CE, Myers AM. Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults. Sports Med 2001;31:91–100. 19 Ashley A, Bartlett H, Lamb S, et al. Evaluation of the Thames Valley Health Walks Scheme. Participant’s feedback survey. OCHRAD report 9. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Health Care Research and Development, 2000. 20 Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. A consumers guide to sub-group analyses. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:78–84. 21 Halbart JA, Silagy CA, Finucane PM, et al. Physicial activity and cardiovascular risk factors: effect of advice from an exercise specialist in Australian general practice. Med J Aust 2000;173:85–7. 22 Yudkin PL, Stratton IM. How to deal with regression to the mean in intervention studies. Lancet 1996;347:241–3 23 Dodd T, ed. All change? The Health Education Monitoring Survey one year on. London: The Stationery Office, 1998. 24 Sarkin JA, Nichols JF, Sallis JF, et al. Self-report measures and scoring protocols affect prevalence estimates of meeting physical activity guidelines. Med Sci Sports Exer 2000;32:149–56 25 Aller KM, Pivarnik JM. Stability and convergent validity of three physical activity assessments. Med Sci Sports Exer 2001;33:671–9. 26 Philippaerts RM, Westerterp KR, Lefevre J. Comparison of two questionnaires with a tri-axial accelerometer to assess physical activity parameters. Int J Sports Med 2001;22:34–9.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/4358

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item