Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

All in the mind? : psychological, social and religious predictors of civic volunteerism among churchgoers in England

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Village, Andrew and Francis, Leslie J. (2010) All in the mind? : psychological, social and religious predictors of civic volunteerism among churchgoers in England. In: Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion , Vol. 21 . BRILL, pp. 1-26. ISBN 90 04 18523 2

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Francis_Village_and_Francis_All_in_the_Mind_RSSSR_final.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (277Kb)
Official URL: http://www.brill.nl/default.aspx?partid=210&pid=41...

Abstract

A number of studies have shown links between volunteerism and a range of sociological and religious variables, mostly based on work from the USA. This study of volunteering among 5220 lay Anglicans in England tested the idea that individual differences in personality could predict civic participation even after allowing for the effects of socio-demographic and religious variables on civic participation. Extraversion significantly increased the probability of civic participation, and the number of different areas of activity among those who did participate. Emotional stability (Neuroticism scale) also significantly increased the chances of volunteering, but not the number of areas of activity among participants. Tender- versus tough-mindedness (Psychoticism scale) had no influence on civic participation in what was a generally tender-minded sample. The results suggest that while socio-demographic factors may affect the opportunities for civic participation, personality and theological orientation may affect the propensity of individuals to participate.

Item Type: Book Item
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute of Education
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Voluntarism -- Psychological aspects, Voluntarism -- Religious aspects -- Anglicans, Voluntarism -- Great Britain, Anglicans -- Great Britain -- Psychology
Series Name: Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion
Publisher: BRILL
ISBN: 90 04 18523 2
Book Title: Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion
Date: 2010
Volume: Vol. 21
Page Range: pp. 1-26
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Allen, N. J., & Rushton, J. P. (1983). Personality characteristics of community health volunteers: A review. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 12, 36-49. Ammerman, N. T. (1987). Bible believers. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Argyle, M. (2000). Psychology and religion: An introduction. London: Routledge. Bekkers, R. (2005). Participation in voluntary associations: Relations with resources personality and political values. Political Psychology, 26, 439-454. Beyerlein, K., & Hipp, J. (2006). From pews to participation: The effect of congregation activity and context on bridging civic engagement. Social Problems, 53, 97-117. Bierhoff, H. W. (2001). Prosocial behaviour. In M. Hewstone & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Introduction to social psychology (3 ed., pp. 285-314). Oxford: Blackwell. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Brierley, P. (2000). The tide is running out. London: Christian Research. Campbell, D. E., & Yonish, S. J. (2003). Religion and volunteerism in America. In C. Smidt (Ed.), Religion as social capital (pp. 87-106). Waco, TX: Baylor University Press. Carlo, G., Allen, J. B., & Buhman, D. C. (1999). Facilitating and disinhibiting prosocial behaviors: The nonlinear interaction of trait perspective taking and trait personal distress on volunteering. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 189-197. Carlo, G., Okun, M. A., Knight, G. P., & Guzman, M. R. T. d. (2005). The interplay of traits and motives on volunteering: Agreeableness, extraversion and prosocial value motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1293-1305. Chaves, M., & Tsitsos, W. (2001). Congregations and social services: What they do, how they do it, and with whom. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 660-683. Cohen, A., Vigoda, E., & Samorly, A. (2001). Analysis of the mediating effect of personal-psychological variables on the relationship between socioeconomic status and political participation: A structural equations framework. Political Psychology, 22, 727-757. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S119. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Curtis, J. E. (1971). Voluntary association joining: A cross-national comparative note. American Sociological Review, 36, 872-880. Curtis, J. E., Baer, D. E., & Grabb, E. G. (2001). Nations of joiners: Explaining voluntary association membership in democratic societies American Sociological Review, 66, 783-805. Curtis, J. E., Grabb, E. G., & Baer, D. E. (1992). Voluntary association membership in fifteen countries: A comparative analysis. American Sociological Review, 57, 139-152. Cutler, S. J., & Hendricks, J. (2000). Age differences in voluntary association memberships: Fact or artefact. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55B, S98-S107. Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Draycott, S. G., & Kline, P. (1995). The Big Three or the Big Five-the EPQ-R vs the NEO-PI: A research note, replication and elaboration. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 801-804. Ecklund, E. H., & Park, J. Z. (2007). Religious diversity and community volunteerism among Asian Americans. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46, 233-244. Ellison, C. G., & George, L. K. (1994). Religious involvement, social ties, and social support in a southeastern community. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33, 46-61. Erez, A., Mikulincer, M., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Kroonenberg, P. M. (2008). Attachment, personality, and volunteering: Placing volunteerism in an attachment-theoretical framework. Personality and Individual Differences 44, 64-74. Eysenck, H. J. (1960). The structure of human personality (2nd ed.). London: Methuen. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum Press. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (adult and junior). London: Hodder & Stoughton. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1976). Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. London: Hodder and Stoughton. Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21-29. Field, J. (2003). Social capital. London: Routledge. Francis, L. J. (1993). The dual nature of the Eysenckian neuroticism scales: A question of sex differences? Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 43-59. Francis, L. J. (1997). The psychology of gender differences in religion: A review of empirical research. Religion, 27, 81-96. Francis, L. J. (2005). Faith and psychology: Personality, religion and the individual. London: Darton, Longman & Todd. Francis, L. J., Brown, L. B., & Philipchalk, R. (1992). The development of an abbreviated form of the revised Eysenck personality questionnaire (EPQR-A): Its use among students in England, Canada, the U.S.A. and Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 443-449. Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., & Astley, J. (2005). Fragmented faith? Exposing the fault-lines in the Church of England. Milton Keynes: Paternoster Press. Haapasalo, J. (1990). The Eysenck personality questionnaire and Zuckerman's sensation seeking scale (form v) in Finland: Age differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 503-508. Herzog, A. R., & Morgan, J. N. (1993). Formal volunteer work among older Americans. In S. A. Bass, F. G. Caro & Y.-P. Chen (Eds.), Achieving a productive aging society (pp. 119–142). Westport, CT: Auburn House. Hodgkinson, V. A., Weitzman, M., Noga, S. M., & Gorski, H. A. (1992). Giving and volunteering in the United States: 1992 edition. Washington DC: Independent Sector. Iannaccone, L. R. (1988). A formal model of church and sect. The American Journal of Sociology, 94 S241-S268. Lenski, G. (1963). The religious factor: A sociologists inquiry. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books. Lodi-Smith, J., & Roberts, B. (2007). Social investment and personality: A meta-analysis of the relationship of personality traits to investment in work, family, religion, and volunteerism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 1-19. Loehlin, J. C., & Martin, N. G. (2001). Age changes in personality traits and their heritabilities during the adult years: Evidence from Australian twin registry samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1147-1160. Loury, G. C. (1977). A dynamic theory of racial income differences. In P. A.Wallace & A. LeMund (Eds.), Women, minorities, and employment discrimination. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books. Loveland, M. T., Sikkink, D., Myers, D. J., & Radcliff, B. (2005). Private prayer and civic involvement. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 1-14. McKenzie, J., Tindell, G., & French, J. (1997). The great triumvirate: Agreement between lexically and psycho-physiologically based models of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 269-277. Musick, M. A., & Wilson, J. (2003). Volunteering and depression: The role of psychological and social resources in different age groups. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 259-269. Penner, L. A., & Finkelstein, M. A. (1998). Dispositional and structural determinants of volunteerism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 525-537. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster. Randall, K. (2005). Evangelicals etcetera: Conflict and conviction in the Church of England's parties. Aldershot: Ashgate. Scholte, R. H. J., & Bruyn, E. E. J. D. (2004). Comparison of the Giant Three and the Big Five in early adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences 36, 1353-1371. Schwadel, P. (2005). Individual, congregational, and denominational effects on church members’ civic participation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 159-171. Shevlin, M., Bailey, F., & Adamson, G. (2002). Examining the factor structure and sources of differential functioning of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised - Abbreviated. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 479-487. Smidt, C. (Ed.). (2003). Religion as social capital. Waco, Tx: Baylor University Press. Smidt, C., Green, J., Guth, J., & Kellstedt, L. A. (2003). Religious involvement, social capital and political engagement: A comparison of the United States and Canada. In C. Smidt (Ed.), Religion as social capital (pp. 153-170). Waco, TX: Baylor University Press. Smith, B. M., & Nelson, L. D. (1975). Personality correlates of helping behavior. Psychological Reports, 37, 307-310. Smith, D. H. (1975). Voluntary action and voluntary groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 247-270. Smith, D. H. (1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering. Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23, 243-263. SPSS. (2008). SPSS Advanced Statistics 17.0. Chicago, Ill.: SPSS Inc. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Viken, R. J., Rose, R. J., Kaprio, J., & Koskenvuo, M. (1994). A developmental genetic analysis of adult personality: Extraversion and neuroticism from 18 to 59 years of age. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 722–730. Warburton, J., & Stirling, C. (2007). Factors affecting volunteering among older rural and city dwelling adults in Australia. Educational Gerontology, 33, 23-43. Wilson, J., & Janoski, T. (1995). The contribution of religion to volunteer work. Sociology of Religion, 56, 137-152. Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 694-713. Wuthnow, R. (1988). The restructuring of American religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Wuthnow, R. (1999). Mobilizing civic engagement: The changing impact of religious involvement. In T. Skocpol & M. P. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 331-365). New York: Brookings Institution Press.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/4387

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us