The Library

Mitochondrial and nuclear genes suggest that stony corals are monophyletic but most families of stony corals are not (Order Scleractinia, Class Anthozoa, Phylum Cnidaria)

Tools

Fukami, Hironobu, Chen, Chaolun Allen, Budd, Ann F., Collins, Allen, Wallace, Carden C., Chuang, Yao-Yang, Chen, Chienhsun, Dai, Chang-Feng, Iwao, Kenji, Sheppard, Charles (Charles R. C.) and Knowlton, Nancy. (2008) Mitochondrial and nuclear genes suggest that stony corals are monophyletic but most families of stony corals are not (Order Scleractinia, Class Anthozoa, Phylum Cnidaria). PL o S One, Vol.3 (No.9). ISSN 1932-6203

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Sheppard_journal.pone.0003222.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (517Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003222

Abstract

Modern hard corals (Class Hexacorallia; Order Scleractinia) are widely studied because of their fundamental role in reef building and their superb fossil record extending back to the Triassic. Nevertheless, interpretations of their evolutionary relationships have been in flux for over a decade. Recent analyses undermine the legitimacy of traditional suborders, families and genera, and suggest that a non-skeletal sister clade (Order Corallimorpharia) might be imbedded within the stony corals. However, these studies either sampled a relatively limited array of taxa or assembled trees from heterogeneous data sets. Here we provide a more comprehensive analysis of Scleractinia (127 species, 75 genera, 17 families) and various outgroups, based on two mitochondrial genes (cytochrome oxidase I, cytochrome b), with analyses of nuclear genes (ßtubulin, ribosomal DNA) of a subset of taxa to test unexpected relationships. Eleven of 16 families were found to be polyphyletic. Strikingly, over one third of all families as conventionally defined contain representatives from the highly divergent "robust" and "complex" clades. However, the recent suggestion that corallimorpharians are true corals that have lost their skeletons was not upheld. Relationships were supported not only by mitochondrial and nuclear genes, but also often by morphological characters which had been ignored or never noted previously. The concordance of molecular characters and more carefully examined morphological characters suggests a future of greater taxonomic stability, as well as the potential to trace the evolutionary history of this ecologically important group using fossils.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	Q Science > QK Botany
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Biological Sciences ( -2010)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Scleractinia -- Genetics, Scleractinia -- Evolution, Corallimorpharia -- Genetics
Journal or Publication Title:	PL o S One
Publisher:	Public Library of Science
ISSN:	1932-6203
Date:	16 September 2008
Volume:	Vol.3
Number:	No.9
Identification Number:	10.1371/journal.pone.0003222
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	National Science Foundation (U.S.) (NSF), Zhong yang yan jiu yuan [Academia Sinica (Taipei, Taiwan)], Nihon Gakujutsu Shinkōkai [Japan Society for the Promotion of Science] (NGS)
Grant number:	DEB0344310 (NSF), 0343208 (NSF), 18770013 (JSPS), 0531779 (NSF)
References:	1. Shearer TL, van Oppen MJH, Romano SL, Wo¨rheide G (2002) Slow mitochondrial DNA sequence evolution in the Anthozoa (Cnidaria). Mol Ecol 11: 2475–2487. 2. Romano SL, Palumbi SR (1996) Evolution of scleractinian corals inferred from molecular systematics. Science 271: 640–642. 3. Romano SL, Palumbi SR (1997) Molecular evolution of a portion of the mitochondrial 16S ribosomal gene region in scleractinian corals. J Mol Evol 45: 397–411. 4. Romano SL, Cairns SD (2000) Molecular phylogenetic hypotheses for the evolution of scleractinian corals. Bull Mar Sci 67: 1043–1068. 5. Chen CA, Wallace CC, Wolstenholme J (2002) Analysis of mitochondrial 12S RNA gene supports a two-clade hypothesis of the evolutionary history of scleractinian corals. Mol Phyl Evol 23: 137–149. 6. Fukami H, Budd AF, Paulay G, Sole-Cava A, Chen CA, et al. (2004) Conventional taxonomy obscures deep divergence between Pacific and Atlantic corals. Nature 427: 832–835. 7. Kerr AM (2005) Molecular and morphological supertree of stony corals (Anthozoa: Scleractinia) using matrix representation parsimony. Biol Rev 80: 543–558. 8. Medina M, Collins AG, Takaoka TL, Kuehl JV, Boore JL (2006) Naked corals: Skeleton loss in Scleractinia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 9096–9100. 9. Brugler MR, France SC (2007) The complete mitochondrial genome of the black coral Chrysopathes formosa (Cnidaria:Anthozoa:Antipatharia) supports classification of antipatharians within the subclass Hexacorallia. Mol Phyl Evol 42: 776–788. 10. Veron JEN, Odorico DM, Chen CA, Miller DJ (1996) Reassessing evolutionary relationships of scleractinian corals. Coral Reefs 15: 1–9. 11. Daly M, Fautin DG, Cappola VA (2003) Systematics of the Hexacorallia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa). Zool J Linn Soc 139: 419–437. 12. Le Goff-Vitry MC, Rogers AD, Baglow D (2004) A deep-sea slant on the molecular phylogeny of the Scleractinia. Mol Phyl Evol 30: 167–177. 13. Cuif JP, Lecointre G, Perrin C, Tillier A, Tillier S (2003) Patterns of septal biomineralization in Scleractinia compared with their 28S rRNA phylogeny: a dual approach for a new taxonomic framework. Zool Scri 32: 459–473. 14. den Hartog JC (1980) Caribbean shallow water Corallimorpharia. Zool Verhand Leiden 176: 1–82. 15. Wei WV, Wallace CC, Dai CF, Moothien Pillay RK, Chen CA (2006) Analyses of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and the 5.8S gene indicate that extremely high rDNA heterogeneity is a unique feature in the scleractinian coral genus Acropora (Scleractinia; Acroporidae). Zool Stud 45: 404–418. 16. Chace MW, Fay MF, Savolainen V (2000) Higher-level classification in the angiosperms: new insights from the perspective of DNA sequence data. Taxon 49: 685–704. 17. Boury-Esnault N (2006) Systematics and evolution of Demospongiae. Can J Zool 84: 205–224. 18. Willis BL, van Oppen MJH, Miller DJ, Vollmer SV, Ayre DJ (2006) The role of hybridization in the evolution of reef corals. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37: 489–517. 19. Vaughan TW, Wells JW (1943) Revision of the suborders, families and genera of the Scleratinia. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 44: 1–363, pl.1–51. 20. Alloiteau J (1957) Contribution a la syste´matique des madre´poraires fossiles. CNRS, Paris. pp 1–462, 286 figs, 20 pls. 21. Benzoni F, Stefani F, Stolarski J, Pichon M, Mitta G, et al. (2007) Debating phylogenetic relationships of the scleractinian Psammocora: molecular and morphological evidences. Contr Zool 76: 35–54. 22. Budd AF, Stolarksi J (2008) Searching for new morphological characters in the systematics of scleractinian reef corals: comparison of septal teeth and granules between Atlantic and Pacific Mussidae. Acta Zool 89: (in press). 23. Bellwood DR, Hughes TP (2001) Regional-scale assembly rules and biodiversity of coral reefs. Science 292: 1532–1534. 24. Carpenter KE, Abrar M, Aeby G, Aronson RB, Banks S, et al. (2008) One third of reef-building corals face elevated extinction risk from climate change and local impacts. Science 321: 560–563. 25. Mace GM, Gittleman JL, Purvis A (2003) Preserving the tree of life. Science 300: 1707–1709. 26. Chen CA, Chang CC, Wei NV, Chen CH, Lein IT, et al. (2004) Secondary structure and phylogenetic utility of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 in the scleractinian corals. Zool Stud 43: 759–771. 27. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817–818. 28. Zwickl DJ (2006) Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion, ver. 0.95. Ph.D. (www.bio.utexas.edu/faculty/antisense/garli/Garli.html). 29. Goloboff P, Farris S, Nixon K (2000) TNT:Tree analysis using New Technology (BETA), ver. 1.0. Argentina: Tucuma´n. 30. Ronquist R, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574. 31. Beagley CT, Okimoto R, Wolstenholme DR (1998) The mitochondrial genome of the sea anemone Metridium senile (Cnidaria): introns, a paucity of tRNA genes, and a near-standard genetic code. Genetics 148: 1091–1108. 32. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M (2001) CONSEL: For assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17: 1246–1247. 33. Shimodaira H (2002) An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst Biol 51: 492–508. 34. Kishino H, Hasegawa M (1989) Evaluation of the maximum-likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J Mol Evol 29: 170–179. 35. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M (1999) Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 16: 1114–1116. 36. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*:Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods), version 4.0b10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. 37. Buckley TR (2002) Model misspecification and probabilistic tests of topology: Evidence from empirical data sets. Syst Biol 51: 509–523.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/4429