The Library

Mitochondrial and nuclear genes suggest that stony corals are monophyletic but most families of stony corals are not (Order Scleractinia, Class Anthozoa, Phylum Cnidaria)

Tools

Fukami, Hironobu, Chen, Chaolun Allen, Budd, Ann F., Collins, Allen, Wallace, Carden C., Chuang, Yao-Yang, Chen, Chienhsun, Dai, Chang-Feng, Iwao, Kenji, Sheppard, Charles (Charles R. C.) and Knowlton, Nancy. (2008) Mitochondrial and nuclear genes suggest that stony corals are monophyletic but most families of stony corals are not (Order Scleractinia, Class Anthozoa, Phylum Cnidaria). PL o S One, Vol.3 (No.9). ISSN 1932-6203

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Sheppard_journal.pone.0003222.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (517Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003222

Abstract

Modern hard corals (Class Hexacorallia; Order Scleractinia) are widely studied because of their fundamental role in reef
building and their superb fossil record extending back to the Triassic. Nevertheless, interpretations of their evolutionary
relationships have been in flux for over a decade. Recent analyses undermine the legitimacy of traditional suborders,
families and genera, and suggest that a non-skeletal sister clade (Order Corallimorpharia) might be imbedded within the
stony corals. However, these studies either sampled a relatively limited array of taxa or assembled trees from heterogeneous
data sets. Here we provide a more comprehensive analysis of Scleractinia (127 species, 75 genera, 17 families) and various
outgroups, based on two mitochondrial genes (cytochrome oxidase I, cytochrome b), with analyses of nuclear genes (ßtubulin,
ribosomal DNA) of a subset of taxa to test unexpected relationships. Eleven of 16 families were found to be
polyphyletic. Strikingly, over one third of all families as conventionally defined contain representatives from the highly
divergent "robust" and "complex" clades. However, the recent suggestion that corallimorpharians are true corals that have
lost their skeletons was not upheld. Relationships were supported not only by mitochondrial and nuclear genes, but also
often by morphological characters which had been ignored or never noted previously. The concordance of molecular
characters and more carefully examined morphological characters suggests a future of greater taxonomic stability, as well as
the potential to trace the evolutionary history of this ecologically important group using fossils.

Item Type:

Journal Article

Subjects:

Q Science > QK Botany

Divisions:

Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Biological Sciences ( -2010)

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

Scleractinia -- Genetics, Scleractinia -- Evolution, Corallimorpharia -- Genetics

Journal or Publication Title:

PL o S One

Publisher:

Public Library of Science

ISSN:

1932-6203

Official Date:

16 September 2008

Dates:

Date	Event
16 September 2008	Published

Volume:

Vol.3

Number:

No.9

Identification Number:

10.1371/journal.pone.0003222

Status:

Peer Reviewed

Access rights to Published version:

Open Access

Funder:

National Science Foundation (U.S.) (NSF), Zhong yang yan jiu yuan [Academia Sinica (Taipei, Taiwan)], Nihon Gakujutsu Shinkōkai [Japan Society for the Promotion of Science] (NGS)

Grant number:

DEB0344310 (NSF), 0343208 (NSF), 18770013 (JSPS), 0531779 (NSF)

References:

1. Shearer TL, van Oppen MJH, Romano SL, Wo¨rheide G (2002) Slow
mitochondrial DNA sequence evolution in the Anthozoa (Cnidaria). Mol Ecol
11: 2475–2487.
2. Romano SL, Palumbi SR (1996) Evolution of scleractinian corals inferred from
molecular systematics. Science 271: 640–642.
3. Romano SL, Palumbi SR (1997) Molecular evolution of a portion of the
mitochondrial 16S ribosomal gene region in scleractinian corals. J Mol Evol 45:
397–411.
4. Romano SL, Cairns SD (2000) Molecular phylogenetic hypotheses for the
evolution of scleractinian corals. Bull Mar Sci 67: 1043–1068.
5. Chen CA, Wallace CC, Wolstenholme J (2002) Analysis of mitochondrial 12S
RNA gene supports a two-clade hypothesis of the evolutionary history of
scleractinian corals. Mol Phyl Evol 23: 137–149.
6. Fukami H, Budd AF, Paulay G, Sole-Cava A, Chen CA, et al. (2004)
Conventional taxonomy obscures deep divergence between Pacific and Atlantic
corals. Nature 427: 832–835.
7. Kerr AM (2005) Molecular and morphological supertree of stony corals
(Anthozoa: Scleractinia) using matrix representation parsimony. Biol Rev 80:
543–558.
8. Medina M, Collins AG, Takaoka TL, Kuehl JV, Boore JL (2006) Naked corals:
Skeleton loss in Scleractinia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 9096–9100.
9. Brugler MR, France SC (2007) The complete mitochondrial genome of the
black coral Chrysopathes formosa (Cnidaria:Anthozoa:Antipatharia) supports
classification of antipatharians within the subclass Hexacorallia. Mol Phyl Evol
42: 776–788.
10. Veron JEN, Odorico DM, Chen CA, Miller DJ (1996) Reassessing evolutionary
relationships of scleractinian corals. Coral Reefs 15: 1–9.
11. Daly M, Fautin DG, Cappola VA (2003) Systematics of the Hexacorallia
(Cnidaria: Anthozoa). Zool J Linn Soc 139: 419–437.
12. Le Goff-Vitry MC, Rogers AD, Baglow D (2004) A deep-sea slant on the
molecular phylogeny of the Scleractinia. Mol Phyl Evol 30: 167–177.
13. Cuif JP, Lecointre G, Perrin C, Tillier A, Tillier S (2003) Patterns of septal
biomineralization in Scleractinia compared with their 28S rRNA phylogeny: a
dual approach for a new taxonomic framework. Zool Scri 32: 459–473.
14. den Hartog JC (1980) Caribbean shallow water Corallimorpharia. Zool
Verhand Leiden 176: 1–82.
15. Wei WV, Wallace CC, Dai CF, Moothien Pillay RK, Chen CA (2006) Analyses
of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and the 5.8S gene indicate
that extremely high rDNA heterogeneity is a unique feature in the scleractinian
coral genus Acropora (Scleractinia; Acroporidae). Zool Stud 45: 404–418.
16. Chace MW, Fay MF, Savolainen V (2000) Higher-level classification in the
angiosperms: new insights from the perspective of DNA sequence data. Taxon
49: 685–704.
17. Boury-Esnault N (2006) Systematics and evolution of Demospongiae. Can J Zool
84: 205–224.
18. Willis BL, van Oppen MJH, Miller DJ, Vollmer SV, Ayre DJ (2006) The role of
hybridization in the evolution of reef corals. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:
489–517.
19. Vaughan TW, Wells JW (1943) Revision of the suborders, families and genera of
the Scleratinia. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 44: 1–363, pl.1–51.
20. Alloiteau J (1957) Contribution a la syste´matique des madre´poraires fossiles.
CNRS, Paris. pp 1–462, 286 figs, 20 pls.
21. Benzoni F, Stefani F, Stolarski J, Pichon M, Mitta G, et al. (2007) Debating
phylogenetic relationships of the scleractinian Psammocora: molecular and
morphological evidences. Contr Zool 76: 35–54.
22. Budd AF, Stolarksi J (2008) Searching for new morphological characters in the
systematics of scleractinian reef corals: comparison of septal teeth and granules
between Atlantic and Pacific Mussidae. Acta Zool 89: (in press).
23. Bellwood DR, Hughes TP (2001) Regional-scale assembly rules and biodiversity
of coral reefs. Science 292: 1532–1534.
24. Carpenter KE, Abrar M, Aeby G, Aronson RB, Banks S, et al. (2008) One third
of reef-building corals face elevated extinction risk from climate change and local
impacts. Science 321: 560–563.
25. Mace GM, Gittleman JL, Purvis A (2003) Preserving the tree of life. Science 300:
1707–1709.
26. Chen CA, Chang CC, Wei NV, Chen CH, Lein IT, et al. (2004) Secondary
structure and phylogenetic utility of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2
in the scleractinian corals. Zool Stud 43: 759–771.
27. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA
substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817–818.
28. Zwickl DJ (2006) Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of
large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion, ver.
0.95. Ph.D. (www.bio.utexas.edu/faculty/antisense/garli/Garli.html).
29. Goloboff P, Farris S, Nixon K (2000) TNT:Tree analysis using New Technology
(BETA), ver. 1.0. Argentina: Tucuma´n.
30. Ronquist R, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference
under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574.
31. Beagley CT, Okimoto R, Wolstenholme DR (1998) The mitochondrial genome
of the sea anemone Metridium senile (Cnidaria): introns, a paucity of tRNA genes,
and a near-standard genetic code. Genetics 148: 1091–1108.
32. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M (2001) CONSEL: For assessing the confidence of
phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17: 1246–1247.
33. Shimodaira H (2002) An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree
selection. Syst Biol 51: 492–508.
34. Kishino H, Hasegawa M (1989) Evaluation of the maximum-likelihood estimate
of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching
order in Hominoidea. J Mol Evol 29: 170–179.
35. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M (1999) Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with
applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 16: 1114–1116.
36. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*:Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other
Methods), version 4.0b10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
37. Buckley TR (2002) Model misspecification and probabilistic tests of topology:
Evidence from empirical data sets. Syst Biol 51: 509–523.