Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The impact of research and development on relative performance evaluation in the UK

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Liu, Lisa Shifei. (2008) The impact of research and development on relative performance evaluation in the UK. International Journal of Managerial Finance, Vol.4 (No.4). pp. 278-294. ISSN 1743-9132

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17439130810902796

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether R&D spending influences the association between the cash compensation of boards of directors and relative performance evaluation (hereafter RPE). Design/methodology/approach Design/methodology/approach – The empirical modelling of directors' compensation focuses on the multiperiod compensation approach suggested by Lambert, Lambert and Larcker and Janairaman, Lambert, and Larcker. A panel sample of 586 UK non-financial public listed firms for the period 1990 to 1998 is employed to test for the existence of RPE in both R&D intensive and non/low R&D firms. Findings – The main results suggest that implicit RPE is used to determine directors' cash compensation before the institutional influences and self-regulation are likely to have taken effect. We find that the association between the cash compensation of directors and accounting measures of relative performance is lower in R&D intensive firms compared to firms with non/low R&D. It is possible that R&D intensive firms do not use accounting-related RPE at all. In comparison, a statistically significant relationship indicates that non/low R&D firms do use accounting-based RPE. The results also show that, in both intensive and non/low R&D firms, cash compensation is negatively related to own firm stock returns and industry average stock returns. Originality/value – This paper contributes to the limited RPE found in the existing UK compensation literature by establishing the implicit use of accounting-based RPE for non/low R&D firms in the UK.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HJ Public Finance
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Accounting
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Journal or Publication Title: International Journal of Managerial Finance
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1743-9132
Date: 2008
Volume: Vol.4
Number: No.4
Number of Pages: 17
Page Range: pp. 278-294
Identification Number: 10.1108/17439130810902796
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/44331

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us