Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The implementation of the Counterweight Programme in Scotland, UK

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Bell-Higgs, A. E., Brosnahan, N. T., Clarke, A. M., Dow, M. S., Haynes, S. M., Lyons, G. F., McCombie, E., Mongia, S., Noble, P. A., Quinn, M. F. et al.
. (2012) The implementation of the Counterweight Programme in Scotland, UK. Family Practice, Vol.29 (Suppl.1). i139-i144. ISSN 0263-2136

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmr074

Abstract

Background: The Counterweight Programme is a proven model for the management of obesity in the UK, evaluated over 5 years (2000-05) and demonstrating clinical and cost effectiveness. The Scottish Government commissioned three phases of Counterweight implementation during the period 2006-08. The first two phases linked the Counterweight Programme to a primary care cardiovascular disease prevention programme; the third phase was commissioned independent of other interventions. Aim: To assess the implementation of the Counterweight Programme in 13 Health Boards in Scotland and compare 12-month outcomes with published Counterweight data. Methods: Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m 2 or BMI ≥ 28 kg/m 2 with at least one co-morbidity were screened for the Counterweight Programme. Patients were asked to attend nine structured appointments with a trained Counterweight Programme practitioner over 12 months. Results: Six thousand seven hundred and fifteen patients from 184 general practices, 16 pharmacies and one centralized community-based service in 13 Health Boards, with a mean BMI of 37 kg/m 2 were enrolled in the Counterweight Programme. Twenty-six per cent had a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m 2. Attendance for patients at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up was 55%, 37% and 28%. Of those who attended at 12 months, 35.2% had maintained a weight loss of ≥5% compared to 30.7% in the original evaluation. Conclusions: Evaluation of the Counterweight Programme in Scotland demonstrated consistency in characteristics of patients enrolled into the programme. There was evidence of higher loss to follow-up in a population not routinely engaging with primary care but evidence of greater weight losses among those who attended. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Journal or Publication Title: Family Practice
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 0263-2136
Date: 2012
Volume: Vol.29
Number: Suppl.1
Page Range: i139-i144
Identification Number: 10.1093/fampra/cmr074
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/44371

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us