The Library

Unfakeable facial configurations affect strategic choices in trust games with or without information about past behavior

Tools

Rezlescu, Constantin, Duchaine, Brad, Olivola, Christopher Yves and Chater, Nick. (2012) Unfakeable facial configurations affect strategic choices in trust games with or without information about past behavior. PLoS ONE, Vol.7 (No.3). e34293. ISSN 1932-6203

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Chater_journal.pone.0034293.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (188Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034293

Abstract

Background
Many human interactions are built on trust, so widespread confidence in first impressions generally favors individuals with trustworthy-looking appearances. However, few studies have explicitly examined: 1) the contribution of unfakeable facial features to trust-based decisions, and 2) how these cues are integrated with information about past behavior.

Methodology/Principal Findings
Using highly controlled stimuli and an improved experimental procedure, we show that unfakeable facial features associated with the appearance of trustworthiness attract higher investments in trust games. The facial trustworthiness premium is large for decisions based solely on faces, with trustworthy identities attracting 42% more money (Study 1), and remains significant though reduced to 6% when reputational information is also available (Study 2). The face trustworthiness premium persists with real (rather than virtual) currency and when higher payoffs are at stake (Study 3).

Conclusions/Significance
Our results demonstrate that cooperation may be affected not only by controllable appearance cues (e.g., clothing, facial expressions) as shown previously, but also by features that are impossible to mimic (e.g., individual facial structure). This unfakeable face trustworthiness effect is not limited to the rare situations where people lack any information about their partners, but survives in richer environments where relevant details about partner past behavior are available.

Item Type:

Journal Article

Subjects:

B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology

Divisions:

Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Behavioural Science

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

Reliability, First impression (Psychology), Face, Trust

Journal or Publication Title:

PLoS ONE

Publisher:

PLOS

ISSN:

1932-6203

Official Date:

March 2012

Dates:

Date	Event
March 2012	Published

Volume:

Vol.7

Number:

No.3

Page Range:

e34293

Identification Number:

10.1371/journal.pone.0034293

Status:

Peer Reviewed

Publication Status:

Published

Access rights to Published version:

Open Access

Funder:

University College, London. ESRC Centre for Economic Learning and Social Evolution (ELSE), AXA Group. Research Fund, Royal Society (Great Britain), British Academy (BA), Royal Academy of Engineering (Great Britain)

References:

1. Hassin R, Trope Y (2000) Facing Faces: Studies on the Cognitive Aspects
of Physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 837–
852.
2. Olivola CY, Todorov A (2010) Fooled by first impressions? Reexamining the
diagnostic value of appearance-based inferences. Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology 46: 315–324.
3. Berry DS (1991) Accuracy in social perception: contributions of facial and vocal
information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61: 298–307.
4. Bond CF, Depaulo BM (2008) Individual differences in judging deception:
accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin 134: 477–92.
5. Willis J, Todorov A (2006) First impressions: Making Up Your Mind After a
100-Ms Exposure to a Face. Psychological Science 17: 592–598.
6. Gorn GJ, Jiang Y, Johar GV (2008) Babyfaces, Trait Inferences, and Company
Evaluations in a Public Relations Crisis. Journal of Consumer Research 35:
36–49.
7. Mueller U, Mazur A (1996) Facial dominance of West Point cadets as a
predictor of later military rank. Social Forces 74: 823–850.
8. Zebrowitz LA, McDonald SM (1991) The impact of litigants’ baby-facedness
and attractiveness on adjudications in small claims courts. Law and Human
Behavior 15: 603–623.
9. Olivola CY, Todorov A (2010) Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-Based
Trait Inferences and Voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 34: 83–110.
10. Arrow K (1973) The limits of organization. New York: Norton & Company.
11. Fukuyama F (1995) Trust: Social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New
York: Free Press.
12. Oosterhof NN, Todorov A (2008) The functional basis of face evaluation.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America 105: 11087–92.
13. Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K (1995) Trust Reciprocity And Social History.
Games and Economic Behavior 10: 122–142.
14. Stirrat M, Perrett DI (2010) Valid Facial Cues to Cooperation and Trust: Male
Facial Width and Trustworthiness. Psychological Science 21: 3 49–354.
15. van’t Wout M, Sanfey AG (2008) Friend or foe: the effect of implicit
trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making. Cognition 108: 796–803.
16. Debruine LM (2002) Facial resemblance enhances trust. Proceedings. Biological
sciences / The Royal Society 269: 1307–12.
17. Scharlemann J (2001) The value of a smile: Game theory with a human face.
Journal of Economic Psychology 22: 617–640.
18. Todorov A, Said CP, Engell AD, Oosterhof NN (2008) Understanding
evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12:
455–60.
19. Todorov A, Olson I (2008) Robust learning of affective trait associations with
faces when the hippocampus is damaged, but not when the amygdala and
temporal pole are damaged. Social, Cognitive, & Affective Neuroscience 3:
195–203.
20. Chang LJ, Doll BB, van’t Wout M, Frank MJ, Sanfey AG (2010) Seeing is
believing: trustworthiness as a dynamic belief. Cognitive Psychology 61: 87–105.
21. Xiao E, Houser D (2005) Emotion expression in human punishment behavior.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America 102: 7398–401.
22. Carre JM, McCormick CM (2008) In your face: facial metrics predict aggressive
behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological sciences 275: 2651–6.