The Library
Unfakeable facial configurations affect strategic choices in trust games with or without information about past behavior
Tools
Rezlescu, Constantin, Duchaine, Brad, Olivola, Christopher Yves, 1980- and Chater, Nick. (2012) Unfakeable facial configurations affect strategic choices in trust games with or without information about past behavior. PLoS ONE, Vol.7 (No.3). e34293. ISSN 1932-6203
|
PDF
WRAP_Chater_journal.pone.0034293.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (188Kb) |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034293
Abstract
Background Many human interactions are built on trust, so widespread confidence in first impressions generally favors individuals with trustworthy-looking appearances. However, few studies have explicitly examined: 1) the contribution of unfakeable facial features to trust-based decisions, and 2) how these cues are integrated with information about past behavior. Methodology/Principal Findings Using highly controlled stimuli and an improved experimental procedure, we show that unfakeable facial features associated with the appearance of trustworthiness attract higher investments in trust games. The facial trustworthiness premium is large for decisions based solely on faces, with trustworthy identities attracting 42% more money (Study 1), and remains significant though reduced to 6% when reputational information is also available (Study 2). The face trustworthiness premium persists with real (rather than virtual) currency and when higher payoffs are at stake (Study 3). Conclusions/Significance Our results demonstrate that cooperation may be affected not only by controllable appearance cues (e.g., clothing, facial expressions) as shown previously, but also by features that are impossible to mimic (e.g., individual facial structure). This unfakeable face trustworthiness effect is not limited to the rare situations where people lack any information about their partners, but survives in richer environments where relevant details about partner past behavior are available.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Behavioural Science |
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Reliability, First impression (Psychology), Face, Trust |
| Journal or Publication Title: | PLoS ONE |
| Publisher: | PLOS |
| ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
| Date: | March 2012 |
| Volume: | Vol.7 |
| Number: | No.3 |
| Page Range: | e34293 |
| Identification Number: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0034293 |
| Status: | Peer Reviewed |
| Publication Status: | Published |
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access |
| Funder: | University College, London. ESRC Centre for Economic Learning and Social Evolution (ELSE), AXA Group. Research Fund, Royal Society (Great Britain), British Academy (BA), Royal Academy of Engineering (Great Britain) |
| References: | 1. Hassin R, Trope Y (2000) Facing Faces: Studies on the Cognitive Aspects of Physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 837– 852. 2. Olivola CY, Todorov A (2010) Fooled by first impressions? Reexamining the diagnostic value of appearance-based inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46: 315–324. 3. Berry DS (1991) Accuracy in social perception: contributions of facial and vocal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61: 298–307. 4. Bond CF, Depaulo BM (2008) Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin 134: 477–92. 5. Willis J, Todorov A (2006) First impressions: Making Up Your Mind After a 100-Ms Exposure to a Face. Psychological Science 17: 592–598. 6. Gorn GJ, Jiang Y, Johar GV (2008) Babyfaces, Trait Inferences, and Company Evaluations in a Public Relations Crisis. Journal of Consumer Research 35: 36–49. 7. Mueller U, Mazur A (1996) Facial dominance of West Point cadets as a predictor of later military rank. Social Forces 74: 823–850. 8. Zebrowitz LA, McDonald SM (1991) The impact of litigants’ baby-facedness and attractiveness on adjudications in small claims courts. Law and Human Behavior 15: 603–623. 9. Olivola CY, Todorov A (2010) Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-Based Trait Inferences and Voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 34: 83–110. 10. Arrow K (1973) The limits of organization. New York: Norton & Company. 11. Fukuyama F (1995) Trust: Social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press. 12. Oosterhof NN, Todorov A (2008) The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 11087–92. 13. Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K (1995) Trust Reciprocity And Social History. Games and Economic Behavior 10: 122–142. 14. Stirrat M, Perrett DI (2010) Valid Facial Cues to Cooperation and Trust: Male Facial Width and Trustworthiness. Psychological Science 21: 3 49–354. 15. van’t Wout M, Sanfey AG (2008) Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making. Cognition 108: 796–803. 16. Debruine LM (2002) Facial resemblance enhances trust. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 269: 1307–12. 17. Scharlemann J (2001) The value of a smile: Game theory with a human face. Journal of Economic Psychology 22: 617–640. 18. Todorov A, Said CP, Engell AD, Oosterhof NN (2008) Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12: 455–60. 19. Todorov A, Olson I (2008) Robust learning of affective trait associations with faces when the hippocampus is damaged, but not when the amygdala and temporal pole are damaged. Social, Cognitive, & Affective Neuroscience 3: 195–203. 20. Chang LJ, Doll BB, van’t Wout M, Frank MJ, Sanfey AG (2010) Seeing is believing: trustworthiness as a dynamic belief. Cognitive Psychology 61: 87–105. 21. Xiao E, Houser D (2005) Emotion expression in human punishment behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 7398–401. 22. Carre JM, McCormick CM (2008) In your face: facial metrics predict aggressive behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological sciences 275: 2651–6. |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/44377 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Tools
Tools

