Crawford, Gregory S., Tosini, Nicola and Waehrer, Keith (2011) Endogenous product choice : a progress report. Working Paper. Coventry: Department of Economics, University of Warwick. (Warwick economics research paper series (TWERPS)). (Unpublished)

Preview

Text (Working paper) WRAP_Crawford_2_twerp_979.pdf - Other Download (341Kb) | Preview

Abstract

Empirical models of differentiated product demand are widely used by both academics and practitioners. While these methods treat carefully the potential endogeneity of price, until recently they have assumed the number and characteristics of the products offered by firms are exogenous. This paper presents a progress report on an ongoing research agenda to address this issue. First, it summarizes how the appropriate choice of “orthogonal” instruments can yield consistent estimates of own and cross-price elasticities in the presence of endogenous product characteristics. Second, it summarizes how to measure “quality markups” and the welfare consequences of endogenous product quality in U.S. cable television markets. Related papers and extensions to consider multiple product characteristics and dynamics are also discussed.

Item Type:	Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Economics -- Mathematical models, Pricing, Business enterprises -- Data processing
Series Name:	Warwick economics research paper series (TWERPS)
Publisher:	Department of Economics, University of Warwick
Place of Publication:	Coventry
Date:	18 December 2011
Number:	Number 979
Number of Pages:	14
Status:	Not Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Unpublished
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC)
Grant number:	RES-062-23-2586 (ESRC)
References:	Ackerberg, D., Gregory S. Crawford, and Jinyong Hahn, “Orthogonal Instruments: Es-timating Price Elasticities in the Presence of Endogenous Product Characteristics,” 2011. Working Paper, University of Warwick. Berry, S., “Estimating Discrete Choice Models of Product Differentiation,” Rand Journal of Eco¬nomics, 1994, 25 (2), 242–262. - and J. Waldfogel, “Do Mergers Increase Product Variety? Evidence from Radio Broad casting,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001, 116 (3), 1009–1025. - , J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes, “Voluntary Export Restraints on Automobiles: Evaluating a Trade Policy,” American Economics Review, 1999, 89 (3), 400–430. Berry, Steven, James Levinsohn, and Ariel Pakes, “Automobile Prices in Market Equilib-rium,” Econometrica, 1995, 63 (4), 841–890. Byrne, David P., “Consolidation and Price Discrimination in the Cable Television Industry,” 2011. Working Paper, University of Melbourne. Chu, Chenghuan Sean, “The Effects of Satellite Entry on Cable Television Prices and Product Quality,” Rand Journal of Economics, 2010, 41 (4), 730–764. Crawford, G., A. Shcherbakov, and M. Shum, “The Welfare Effects of Endogenous Quality Choice: Evidence from Cable Television Markets,” 2011. mimeo, University of Warwick. Crawford, Gregory S. and Matthew Shum, “Monopoly Quality Degradation in the Cable Television Industry,” The Journal of Law and Economics, 2007, 50 (1), 181–219. DG Comp, “Economic Evidence in Merger Analysis,” Technical Re port, Directory General for Competition February 2011. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/competition/international/multilateral/2011_feb_economic_evidence.pdf. DOJ/FTC, Horizontal Merger Guidelines, United States, 2010. Jointly authored by U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission. Available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2010/08/100819hmg.pdf. Draganska, M., M. Mazzeo, and K. Seim, “Beyond Plain Vanilla: Modeling Joint Product Assortment and Pricing Decisions,” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 2009, 7, 105–146. Eizenberg, A., “Upstream Innovation and Product Variety in the U.S. Home PC Market,” 2011. Working Paper, Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Fan, Y., “Ownership Consolidation and Product Quality: A Study of the U.S. Daily Newspaper Market,” 2010. Working Paper, University of Michigan. Gandhi, Amit, Luke Froeb, Steven Tschantz, and Gregory J. Werden, “Post-Merger Product Repositioning,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 2008, 56 (1), 49–67. Griffith, Rachel, Lars Nesheim, and Martin O’Connell, “Sin taxes in differentiated product oligopoly: an application to the butter and margarine market,” 2010. CeMMAP Working Paper No. CWP37/10. Maskin, Eric and John Riley, “Monopoly with Incomplete Information,” RAND Journal of Economics, 1984, 15 (2), 171–196. McManus, Brian, “Nonlinear Pricing in an Oligopoly Market: The Case of Specialty Coffee,” Rand Journal of Economics, Summer 2007, 38, 512–532. Mussa, M. and S. Rosen, “Monopoly and Product Quality,” Journal of Economic Theory, 1978, 18 (2), 301–17. Nevo, A., “Mergers with Differentiated Products: The Case of the Ready-To-Eat Cereal Industry,” RAND Journal of Economics, 2000, 31 (3), 395–421. Nevo, Aviv, “Measuring Market Power in the Ready-To-Eat Cereal Industry,” Econometrica, 2001, 69 (2), 307–342. Nosko, C., “Competition and Quality Choice in the CPU Market,” 2010. Working Paper, Uni-versity of Chicago, Graduate School of Business. Petrin, Amil, “Quantifying the Benefits of New Products: The Case of the Minivan,” Journal of Political Economy, 2003, 110 (4), 705–729. Rochet, Jean-Charles and Lars A. Stole, “Nonlinear Pricing with Random Participation,” Review of Economic Studies, 2002, 69 (1), 277–311. Shapiro, Carl, “Mergers with Differentiated Products,” Antitrust, 1996, pp. 23–30. Spence, A. M., “Monopoly, Quality, and Regulation,” Bell Journal of Economics, 1975, 6 (2), 417–29. Sweeting, A., “The Effects of Merger on Product Positioning: Evidence from the Music Radio Industry,” Rand Journal of Economics, 2010, 41 (2), 372–97. - , “Dynamic Product Positioning in Differentiated Product Markets: The Effect of Fees for Musical Performance Rights on the Commercial Radio Industry,” 2011. Working Paper, Duke University. Tenn, S., Luke Froeb, and Steven Tschantz, “Mergers when firms compete by choosing both price and promotion,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2010, 28, 695–707. Wilson, R., Nonlinear Pricing, Oxford University Press, 1993.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/44431

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item