So you call that research? : mending methodological biases in strategy and organization departments of top business schools
Heugens, Pursey and Mol, Michael J. (2005) So you call that research? : mending methodological biases in strategy and organization departments of top business schools. Strategic Organization, Vol.3 (No.1). pp. 117-128. ISSN 1476-1270 Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476127005050030 AbstractWe believe that all strategy and organization (SO) scholars should be able to decide for themselves whether to specialize in certain parts of the knowledge cycle or adopt a broader, multi-method view on the scientific process. In a situation of ―methodological pluralism‖, individuals might choose to contribute to the construction of new administrative theories by means of qualitative works like case studies, ethnographies, biographies, or grounded theory studies (e.g., see Denzin and Lincoln, 2000). Others could then specialize in testing these theories by means of experiments, surveys, or longitudinal econometric studies (e.g., see Lewis-Beck, 1987-2004). Again others could combine both approaches in Herculean attempts to conduct high-impact, integrative research with the potential to change the way we understand the field as a whole. | Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education |
|---|
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School |
|---|
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Business schools -- Curricula, Strategic planning -- Study and teaching, Strategic planning -- Research -- Methodology |
|---|
| Journal or Publication Title: | Strategic Organization |
|---|
| Publisher: | Sage Publications Ltd |
|---|
| ISSN: | 1476-1270 |
|---|
| Date: | 2005 |
|---|
| Volume: | Vol.3 |
|---|
| Number: | No.1 |
|---|
| Page Range: | pp. 117-128 |
|---|
| Status: | Peer Reviewed |
|---|
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
|---|
| References: | Baum, J. A. C., Greenwood, R., and Jennings, P. D. 2003. Welcome to strategic organization – SO! Strategic Organization, 1(1): 5-8.
Campbell, D. T. 1975. Degrees of freedom and the case study. Comparative Political Studies, 8(1), 178-191.
Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C. 1966. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S. 2000. The Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dillman, D. A. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Durkheim, E. 1951/1897. Suicide: A Study in Sociology. New York: The Free Press.
Eckstein, H. 1975. Case study and theory in political science. In: F. J. Greenstein, and N. W. Polsby (Eds.) Handbook of Political Science (Vol. 7). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 79—137.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532—550.
Flyvbjerg, B. 2004. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. In: C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, and D. Silverman (Eds.) Qualitative Research Practice. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 420—434.
Gerring, J. 2004. What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341-354.
Kuhn, T. S. 1970 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lewis-Beck, M. S. (Ed.) 1987-2004. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences (a Sage University Paper Series). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moldoveanu, M. C., and Baum, J. A. C. 2002. Contemporary debates in organizational epistemology. In: J. A. C. Baum (Ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell, 733—751.
Ostrom, E. 1998. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action (Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997). American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1—22.
Sigelman, L. 2004. Report of the editor of the American Political Science Review, 2002-2003. PS: Political Science and Politics, 37(January): 113—117.
Van de Ven, A. H. 2002. Presidential address: Strategic directions for the Academy of Management: This academy is for you! Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 171—184. |
|---|
Request changes to a record Repository Staff Only: item control page |
![[img]](http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
