The Library

A statistical evaluation of the effects of gender differences in assessment of acute inhalation toxicity

Tools

Price, Charlotte L, Stallard, Nigel, Creton, Stuart, Indans, Ian, Guest, Robert, Griffiths, David and Edwards, Philippa. (2011) A statistical evaluation of the effects of gender differences in assessment of acute inhalation toxicity. Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol.30 (No.3). pp. 217-238. ISSN 0960-3271

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Stallard_Statistical_Evaluation.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (745Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0960327110370982

Abstract

Acute inhalation toxicity of chemicals has conventionally been assessed by the median lethal concentration
(LC50) test (organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD) TG 403). Two new methods,
the recently adopted acute toxic class method (ATC; OECD TG 436) and a proposed fixed concentration procedure
(FCP), have recently been considered, but statistical evaluations of these methods did not investigate
the influence of differential sensitivity between male and female rats on the outcomes. This paper presents an
analysis of data from the assessment of acute inhalation toxicity for 56 substances. Statistically significant differences
between the LC50 for males and females were found for 16 substances, with greater than 10-fold differences
in the LC50 for two substances. The paper also reports a statistical evaluation of the three test
methods in the presence of unanticipated gender differences. With TG 403, a gender difference leads to a
slightly greater chance of under-classification. This is also the case for the ATC method, but more pronounced
than for TG 403, with misclassification of nearly all substances from Globally Harmonised System (GHS) class 3
into class 4. As the FCP uses females only, if females are more sensitive, the classification is unchanged. If males
are more sensitive, the procedure may lead to under-classification. Additional research on modification of the
FCP is thus proposed.

Item Type:

Journal Article

Subjects:

R Medicine > RC Internal medicine

Divisions:

Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

Pulmonary toxicology -- Sex differences, Toxicity testing

Journal or Publication Title:

Human & Experimental Toxicology

Publisher:

Sage Publications Ltd.

ISSN:

0960-3271

Official Date:

March 2011

Dates:

Date	Event
March 2011	Published

Volume:

Vol.30

Number:

No.3

Page Range:

pp. 217-238

Identification Number:

10.1177/0960327110370982

Status:

Peer Reviewed

Publication Status:

Published

Access rights to Published version:

Open Access

Funder:

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement, and Reduction of Animals in Research (Great Britain) (NC3R)

Grant number:

NC3Rs (National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research)

References:

1. Trevan J. The error of determination toxicity. Proc R
Soc 1927; 101B: 483–514.
2. Botham PA. Acute systemic toxicity – prospects for
tiered testing strategies. Toxicol In Vitro 2004; 18:
227–230.
3. OECD. Guidelines for the testing of chemical substances.
Acute inhalation toxicity. No. 403. Paris, 1981.
4. OECD. Guideline for the testing of chemicals. Acute
oral toxicity. No. 401. Paris, 1981.
5. OECD. Harmonized integrated hazard classification
system for human health and environmental effects of
chemical substances. Paris, 1998.
6. DixonWJ,MoodAM.Amethod for obtaining and analyzing
sensitivity data. J Am Stat Assoc 1948; 43: 109–126.
7. Brownlee KA, Hodges JL, Rosenblatt M. The up-anddown
method with small samples. J Am Stat Assoc
1953; 48: 262–277.
8. Dixon WJ. The up-and-down method for small
samples. J Am Stat Assoc 1965; 60: 967–978.
9. OECD. Guidelines for the testing of chemical
substances. Acute inhalation toxicity (revised). No.
403. Paris, 2009.
10. OECD. Guidelines for the testing of chemical
substances. Acute inhalation toxicity – acute toxic
class method. No. 436. Paris, 2009.
11. GreinerM. ‘Report onBiostatisticalPerformance Assessment
of Draft TG436 Acute Toxic ClassMethod for Acute
Inhalation Toxicity’, http://www.oecd.org/LongAbstract/
0,3425,en_33873108_33844437_41762 050_1_1_1_1,
00.html (2008). Accessed 23 April 2010.
12. OECD. Guidelines for testing of chemical substances.
Acute inhalation toxicity– fixed concentration procedure.
Draft No. 433. Paris, 2004.
13. OECD. Guidelines for the testing of chemical
substances. Acute oral toxicity – fixed dose method.
No. 420. Paris, 2000.
14. Stallard N, Whitehead A, Indans I. Statistical evaluation
of the fixed concentration procedure for acute
inhalation toxicity assessment. Hum Exp Toxicol
2003; 22: 575–585.
15. Zbinden G, Fluryroversi M. Significance of the LD50-
test for the toxicological evaluation of chemicalsubstances.
Arch Toxicol 1981; 47: 77–99.
16. Lorke D. A new approach to practical acute toxicity
testing. Arch Toxicol 1983; 54: 275–287.
17. Tamborini P, Sigg H, Zbinden G. Acute toxicity testing
in the nonlethal dose range: a new approach. Regul
Toxicol Pharmacol 1990; 12: 69–87.
18. LipnickRL, Cotruvo JA, Hill RN, Bruce RD, StitzelKA,
Walker AP, et al. Comparison of the up-and-down, conventional
LD50, and fixed-dose acute toxicity procedures.
Food Chem Toxicol 1995; 33: 223–231.
19. DePass LR. Alternative approaches in median lethality
(LD50) and acute toxicity testing. Toxicol Lett 1989;
49: 159–170.
20. OECD. Guidance document on acute inhalation toxicity
testing. Environmental health and safety monograph
series on testing and assessment. No. 39. Paris, 2009.
21. Stallard N, Whitehead A. The fixed-dose procedure
and the acute-toxic-class method: a mathematical comparison.
Hum Exp Toxicol 1995; 14: 974–990.
22. Stallard, N, Price, C, Creton, S, et al. A new sighting
study for the fixed concentration procedure to allow
for gender differences. Hum Exp Toxicol (2010)
DOI 10.1 177/0960327110370983.