Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Cross-cultural comparison of correlates of quality of life and health status : the Whitehall II Study (UK) and the Western New York Health Study (US)

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Franco, Oscar H., Wong, Yim Lun, Kandala, Ngianga-Bakwin, Ferrie, Jane E., Dorn, Joan M., Kivimäki, Mika, Clarke, Aileen, 1955-, Donahue, Richard P., Manoux, Archana Singh, Freudenheim, Jo L., Trevisan, Maurizio and Stranges, Saverio. (2012) Cross-cultural comparison of correlates of quality of life and health status : the Whitehall II Study (UK) and the Western New York Health Study (US). European Journal of Epidemiology, Vol.27 (No.4). pp. 255-265. ISSN 0393-2990

[img]
Preview
Text
WRAP_Franco_art_10.1007_s10654-012-9664-z.pdf - Published Version

Download (196Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (Cover sheet)
WRAP_franco_coversheet_ASTRO.pdf - Draft Version

Download (50Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-012-9664-z

Abstract

Measures of quality of life (QoL) have been found to be predictors of mortality and morbidity; however, there is still limited understanding of the multifaceted nature of these measures and of potential correlates. Using two large populations from the UK and US, we aimed to evaluate and compare measured levels of QoL and the key factors correlated with these levels. Participants were 6,472 white subjects (1,829 women) from the Whitehall II Study (mean age 55.8 years) and 3,684 white subjects (1,903 women) from the Western New York Health Study (mean age 58.7 years). QoL was assessed in both using the physical and mental health component summaries of the short form-36 questionnaire (SF-36). Analysis of covariance was used to compare gender-specific mean scores for the two populations across several potential correlates (including socio-demographic, lifestyle and co-morbidity factors). Levels of reported physical QoL tended to be higher in the UK population (51.2 vs. 48.6) while mental QoL was higher in the US group (53.1 vs. 51.1). Age, sleep duration and depressive symptoms were the main factors correlated with both physical and mental QoL in both samples. Increasing age was associated with poorer physical health but higher mental health scores in both populations (P < 0.001). Sleep duration below 6 or above 8 h was associated with lower levels of QoL. Depressive symptoms were strongly associated with poorer mental health scores (P < 0.001) while higher BMI, lower physical activity levels and presence of cardiovascular disease were associated with poorer physical health in both samples and gender (P < 0.05). There were consistent findings for correlates of QoL in this cross-cultural comparison of two populations from the UK and US. Strongest associations were between lifestyle and co-morbidity factors and the physical health component of the SF-36 rather than the mental health component. This is a novel finding which warrants further consideration.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Quality of life -- Great Britain, Quality of life -- United States
Journal or Publication Title: European Journal of Epidemiology
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
ISSN: 0393-2990
Date: 2012
Volume: Vol.27
Number: No.4
Page Range: pp. 255-265
Identification Number: 10.1007/s10654-012-9664-z
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U.S.)
Grant number: P50 AA09802 (NIAAA)
References: 1. Clifton J, Gingrich N. Are citizens of the world satisfied with their health? Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(5):w545–51. 2. Mossey JM, Shapiro E. Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly. Am J Public Health. 1982;72(8):800–8. 3. Wannamethee G, Shaper AG. Self-assessment of health status and mortality in middle-aged British men. Int J Epidemiol. 1991;20(1):239–45. 4. WHO. Preamble to the constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the international health conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 states (official records of the World Health Organization, vol 2, p 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948. 5. Khawaja M, Mowafi M. Cultural capital and self-rated health in low income women: evidence from the urban health study, Beirut, Lebanon. J Urban Health. 2006;83(3):444–58. 6. Lahelma E, Arber S, Kivela K, Roos E. Multiple roles and health among British and Finnish women: the influence of socioeconomic circumstances. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(5):727–40. 7. Ohaeri JU, Awadalla AW, Gado OM. Subjective quality of life in a nationwide sample of Kuwaiti subjects using the short version of the WHO quality of life instrument. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009;44(8):693–701. 8. Unden AL, Elofsson S. Do different factors explain self-rated health in men and women? Gend Med. 2006;3(4):295–308. 9. Shroufi A, Chowdhury R, Aston LM, Pashayan N, Franco OH. Measuring health: a practical challenge with a philosophical solution? Maturitas. 2011;68(3):210–6. 10. Satya P. The quality of life: an international comparison based on ordinal measures. Appl Econ Lett. 1997;7:411–2. 11. Banks J, Marmot M, Oldfield Z, Smith JP. Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England. JAMA. 2006;295(17): 2037–45. 12. Singh-Manoux A, Martikainen P, Ferrie J, Zins M, Marmot M, Goldberg M. What does self rated health measure? Results from the British Whitehall II and French Gazel cohort studies. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(4):364–72. 13. Marmot MG, Rose G, Shipley M, Hamilton PJ. Employment grade and coronary heart disease in British civil servants. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1978;32(4):244–9. 14. Marmot MG, Smith GD, Stansfeld S, Patel C, North F, Head J, et al. Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet. 1991;337(8754):1387–93. 15. Stranges S, Notaro J, Freudenheim JL, Calogero RM, Muti P, Farinaro E, et al. Alcohol drinking pattern and subjective health in a population-based study. Addiction. 2006;101(9):1265–76. 16. Stranges S, Dorn JM, Shipley MJ, Kandala NB, Trevisan M, Miller MA, et al. Correlates of short and long sleep duration: a cross-cultural comparison between the United Kingdom and the United States: the Whitehall II Study and the Western New York Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(12):1353–64. 17. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992; 305(6846):160–4. 18. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ. 1993;306(6890):1437–40. 19. Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3130–9. 20. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SK. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user’s manual. Boston: The Health Institute; 1994. 21. Sallis JF, Haskell WL, Wood PD, Fortmann SP, Rogers T, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five- City project. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121(1):91–106. 22. Netuveli G, Blane D. Quality of life in older ages. Br Med Bull. 2008;85:113–26. 23. Sprangers MA, Schwartz CE. Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(11):1507–15. 24. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126–31. 25. Hassmen P, Koivula N, Uutela A. Physical exercise and psychological well-being: a population study in Finland. Prev Med. 2000;30(1):17–25. 26. McAuley E, Konopack JF, Motl RW, Morris KS, Doerksen SE, Rosengren KR. Physical activity and quality of life in older adults: influence of health status and self-efficacy. Ann Behav Med. 2006;31(1):99–103. 27. McAuley E, Marquez DX, Jerome GJ, Blissmer B, Katula J. Physical activity and physique anxiety in older adults: fitness, and efficacy influences. Aging Ment Health. 2002;6(3):222–30. 28. Taylor CB, Sallis JF, Needle R. The relation of physical activity and exercise to mental health. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2): 195–202. 29. Ferrie JE, Shipley MJ, Cappuccio FP, Brunner E, Miller MA, Kumari M, et al. A prospective study of change in sleep duration: associations with mortality in the Whitehall II cohort. Sleep. 2007;30(12):1659–66. 30. Kripke DF, Garfinkel L, Wingard DL, Klauber MR, Marler MR. Mortality associated with sleep duration and insomnia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59(2):131–6. 31. Patel SR, Ayas NT, Malhotra MR, White DP, Schernhammer ES, Speizer FE, et al. A prospective study of sleep duration and mortality risk in women. Sleep. 2004;27(3):440–4. 32. Fillmore KM, Golding JM, Graves KL, Kniep S, Leino EV, Romelsjo A, et al. Alcohol consumption and mortality. I. Characteristics of drinking groups. Addiction. 1998;93(2):183–203. 33. Tsubono Y, Yamada S, Nishino Y, Tsuji I, Hisamichi S. Choice of comparison group in assessing the health effects of moderate alcohol consumption. JAMA. 2001;286(10):1177–8. 34. Jylha M, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Jokela J, Heikkinen E. Is selfrated health comparable across cultures and genders? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1998;53(3):S144–52. 35. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1: 385–401.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/44907

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us