Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Information revelation and anti-pandering in elections

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Kartiky, Navin, Squintani, Francesco and Tinnx, Katrin (2011) Information revelation and anti-pandering in elections. In: Invited Speaker : Political Economy Workshop, New York University, 21 Oct 2011 (Unpublished)

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://politics.as.nyu.edu/object/Squintani_102111...

Abstract

We study a Downsian model of elections in which two candidates who are primarily office-motivated have policy-relevant private information. A conventional intuition is that electoral competition bene�ts voters by inducing candidates to choose (constrained-)efficient platforms. A countering perspective is that inefficiencies obtain because candidates distort their platforms toward the voters' prior beliefs, i.e. they pander. We �nd that both intuitions are incorrect for familiar classes of information structures. In our model, office-motivated candidates have an incentive to exaggerate their private information, i.e. to anti-pander. While platforms can still reveal information, equilibrium voter welfare is limited. Our main result is that voter welfare in the Downsian game cannot be any higher than under \dictatorship" by a single non-ideological politician; furthermore, if both candidates have a positive probability of winning in the Downsian game, voter welfare is strictly lower. Normatively, we also show that pandering would improve efficiency; while this is incompatible with office-motivated candidates, it would be an equilibrium were candidates benevolent.

Item Type: Conference Item (Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
J Political Science > JC Political theory
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Date: 21 October 2011
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Unpublished
Version or Related Resource: Kartiky, Navin, et al. (2011). Information revelation and anti-pandering in elections. Invited Speaker : Department of Economics. Boston University, Boston, 18 Oct 2011. Kartiky, Navin, et al. (2012). Information revelation and anti-pandering in elections. Invited Speaker : Monterey Theory Workshops. University of Wisconsin-Madison, 13 Apr 2012. Kartiky, Navin, et al. (2012). Information revelation and anti-pandering in elections. Invited Speaker : Political Economy Seminar Series. Northwestern University, 16 Apr 2012. Kartiky, Navin, et al. (2012). Information revelation and anti-pandering in elections. Invited Speaker : Washington University in St. Louis. St. Louis, 19 Apr 2012.
Conference Paper Type: Paper
Title of Event: Invited Speaker : Political Economy Workshop
Type of Event: Other
Location of Event: New York University
Date(s) of Event: 21 Oct 2011
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/45080

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us