Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Inter-epistemic power and transforming knowledge objects in a biomedical network

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

McGivern, Gerry and Dopson, Sue. (2010) Inter-epistemic power and transforming knowledge objects in a biomedical network. Organization Studies, Vol.31 (No.12). pp. 1667-1686. ISSN 0170-8406

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_McGivern__inter-epistemic.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (308Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840610380808

Abstract

We examine a multidisciplinary network established to translate genetics science into practice in the British NHS. Drawing on theory about epistemic communities and objects, we describe three stages in their lifecycle (vision/formation, transformation and reincarnation) and epistemic clashes over knowledge objects. Medical academics captured jurisdiction over the network at formation, through their superior knowledge of the nascent genetics discipline, producing epistemic objects reflecting their interests. A governmental community challenged medical academics for jurisdiction but, unable to transform objects by changing their space of representation in performance reporting, ceased funding the network, which then closed. Afterwards, however, a NHS community successfully ‘reincarnated’ a discarded epistemic object into a technical object in NHS practice. We make a theoretical contribution by developing a processual framework for understanding biomedical innovation, focusing on transforming objects situated between different wider knowledge/power structures. This explains how objects were transformed at micro-level through the interaction and relative power of local communities, influenced by macro-level rules about knowledge formation in wider epistemic, organizational and governmental communities.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Medical innovations, Knowledge, Sociology of
Journal or Publication Title: Organization Studies
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
ISSN: 0170-8406
Date: 2010
Volume: Vol.31
Number: No.12
Page Range: pp. 1667-1686
Identification Number: 10.1177/0170840610380808
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: National Institute for Health Research (Great Britain) (NIHR)
References: Abbott, Andrew 1988 The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Bechky, B. A. 2003 ‘Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor’. Organization Science 14/3: 312–330. Blackler, Frank 1993 ‘Knowledge and the theory of organizations: Organizations as activity systems and the reframing of management’. Journal of Management Studies 30/6: 863–884. Blackler, Frank 1995 ‘Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation’. Organization Studies 16/6: 1021–1046. Boreham, Paul 1983 ‘Indetermination: Professional knowledge, organization and control’. The Sociological Review 31/4: 693–718. Brown, Andrew 1998 ‘Narrative, politics and legitimacy in an IT implementation’. Journal of Management Studies 35/1: 35–58. Contu, Alessia, and Hugh Willmott 2003 ‘Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory’. Organization Science 13/3: 283–296. Currie, Graeme, and Olga Suhomlinova 2006 ‘The impact of institutional forces upon knowledge sharing in the UK NHS: The triumph of professional power and the inconsistency of policy’. Public Administration 84/1: 1–30. Czarniawska, Barbara 1998 ‘Narrating the organization’. Organization Studies 19/6: 1045–1048. Department of Health 2003 Our inheritance our future: Realising the potential of genetics in health. London: HMSO. Dopson, Sue 2005 ‘The diffusion of medical innovations: Can figurational sociology contribute?’. Organization Studies 26/8: 1125–1144. Dopson, Sue, and Louise Fitzgerald 2006 Knowledge to action: Evidence-based healthcare in context. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dyer, W. Gibb, and Alan Wilkins 1991 ‘Better, stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt’. Academy of Management Review 16/3: 613–620. Eisenhardt, Kathleen 1989 ‘Building theories from case study research’. Academy of Management Review 14/4: 532–550. Engestrom, Yrjo 1987 Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit. Engestrom, Yrjo, and Frank Blackler 2005 ‘On the life of the object’. Organization 12/3: 307–330. Ewenstein, Boris, and Jennifer Whyte 2009 ‘Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as epistemic objects’. Organization Studies 30/1: 7–30. Ferlie, Ewan, Lynn Ashburner, Louise Fitzgerald, and Andrew Pettigrew 1996 New public management in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ferlie, Ewan, Louise Fitzgerald, Martin Wood, and Chris Hawkins 2005 ‘The (non) spread of innovations: The mediating role of professionals’. Academy of Management Journal 48/1: 117–134. Foucault, Michel 1991 ‘Governmentality’ in The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller (eds), 87–104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Foucault, Michel 2008 The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge. Freidson, Elliot 1994 Professionalism reborn: Theory, prophesy and policy. Cambridge: Polity Press. Gabriel, Yiannis 1995 ‘The unmanaged organization: Stories, fantasies and subjectivity’. Organization Studies 16/3: 477–501. Garud, Raghu, Sanjay Jain, and Philipp Tuertscher 2008 ‘Incomplete by design and designing for incompleteness’. Organization Studies 29/3: 351–372. Hindmarsh, Jon, and Alison Pilnick 2009 ‘Knowing bodies at work: Embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anaesthesia’. Organization Studies 28/9: 1395–1416. Jamous, Haroun, and Bernard Peloille 1970 ‘Changes in the French university-hospital system’ in Professions and professionalisation. J. Jackson (ed.), 109–152. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Knorr-Cetina, Karin 1997 ‘Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies’. Theory, Culture & Society 14/4: 1–30. Knorr-Cetina, Karin 1999 Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Knorr-Cetina, Karin 2001 ‘Objectual practice’ in The practice turn in contemporary theory. T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, and E. Savigny (eds), 175–188. Abingdon: Routledge. Langley, Ann 1999 ‘Strategies for theorizing from process data’. Academy of Management Review 24/4: 691–710. Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar 1986 Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Leigh-Star, Susan, and James Griesemer 1989 ‘Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39’. Social Studies of Science 19/3: 387–420. Liebeskind, Julia, Amalya Oliver, Lynne Zucker, and Marilynn Brewer 1996 ‘Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms’. Organization Science 7/4: 428–443. McGivern, Gerry, and Ewan Ferlie 2007 ‘Playing tick box games: Interrelating defences in professional appraisal’. Human Relations 60/9: 1361–1385. Miettinen, Reijo, Dalvir Samra-Fredericks, and Dvora Yanow 2009 ‘Re-turn to practice: An introductory essay’. Organization Studies 30/12: 1309–1328. Nightingale, Paul, and Paul Martin 2004 ‘The myth of the biotechnology revolution’. Trends in Biotechnology 22/11: 564–569. Ormrod, Sue, Ewan Ferlie, Fiona Warren, and Kingsley Norton 2007 ‘The appropriation of new organisational forms within networks of practice: Founder power and founder-related ideological power’. Human Relations 60/5: 745–767. Orr, Julian 1996 Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Pentland, Brian 1999 ‘Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation’. Academy of Management Review 24/4: 711–724. Pettigrew, Andrew, Richard Woodman, and Kim Cameron 2001 ‘Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research’. Academy of Management Journal 44/4: 697–713. Pinch, Trevor J., and Weibe Bijker 1987 ‘The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other’ in The social construction of technological systems. W. Bijker, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch (eds), 17–50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pisano, Gary 2006 ‘Can science be a business? Lessons from biotech’. Harvard Business Review October: 114–125. Powell, Walter, Kenneth W. Koput, and Laurel Smith-Doerr 1996 ‘Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology’. Administrative Science Quarterly 41/1: 116–145. Rheinberger, Hans-Jorg 1997 Towards a history of epistemic things: Synthesing proteins in the test tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Robertson, Maxine, Harry Scarbrough, and Jackie Swan 2003 ‘Knowledge creation in professional service firms: Institutional effects’. Organization Studies 24/6: 831–858. Rockhill Khlinovskaya, Elena 2007 ‘On interdisciplinarity and models of knowledge production’. Social Analysis 51/3: 121–147. Rose, Nikolas, and Peter Miller 1992 ‘Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government’. The British Journal of Sociology 43/2: 173–205. Sapsed, Jonathan, and Ammon Salter 2004 ‘Postcards from the edge: Local communities, global programs and boundary objects’. Organization Studies 25/9: 1515–1534. Strathern, Marilyn 2007 ‘Interdisciplinarity in judgement: New modes of evaluative practice’ in Knowledge making: Use and evaluation in the domains of the social sciences. C. Camic, N. Gross, and M. Lamond (eds). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Sunder-Rajan, Kaushik 2006 Biocapital: The constitution of post-genomic life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Swan, Jackie, Mike Bresnen, Sue Newell, and Maxine Robertson 2007 ‘The object of knowledge: The role of objects in biomedical innovation’. Human Relations 60/12: 1809–1837. Van de Ven, Andrew, and M. Scott Poole 1995 ‘Explaining development and change in organizations’. Academy of Management Review 20/3: 510–540. Van de Ven, Andrew, and M. Scott Poole 2005 ‘Alternative approaches for studying organizational change’. Organization Studies 26/9: 1377–1404. Wainwright, Steven, Clare Williams, Mike Michael, Bobbie Farsides, and Alan Cribb 2006 ‘From bench to bedside? Biomedical scientists’ expectations of stem cell science as a future therapy for diabetes’. Social Science & Medicine 63/8: 2052–2064. Waring, Justin, and Graeme Currie 2009 ‘Managing expert knowledge: Organizational challenges and managerial futures for the UK medical profession’. Organization Studies 30/7: 755–778. Yanow, Dvora 2006 ‘Talking about practices: On Julian Orr’s Talking about Machines’. Organization Studies 27/12: 1743–1756. Yanow, Dvora, and Hari Tsoukas 2009 ‘What is reflection-in-action? A phenomenological account’. Journal of Management Studies 46/8: 1339–1364.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/45256

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us