Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Time to guide: evidence for delayed attentional guidance in contextual cueing

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Kunar, Melina A. , Flusberg, Stephen J. and Wolfe, Jeremy M. (2008) Time to guide: evidence for delayed attentional guidance in contextual cueing. Visual Cognition, Vol.16 (No.6). pp. 804-825. ISSN 1350-6285

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Kunar_8573940-230209-Kunar_Time_to_Guide.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (376Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506280701751224

Abstract

Contextual cueing experiments show that, when displays are repeated, reaction times (RTs) to find a target decrease over time even when the observers are not aware of the repetition. Recent evidence suggests that this benefit in standard contextual cueing tasks is not likely to be due to an improvement in attentional guidance (Kunar, Flusberg, Horowitz, & Wolfe, 2007). Nevertheless, we ask whether guidance can help participants find the target in a repeated display, if they are given sufficient time to encode the display. In Experiment 1 we increased the display complexity so that it took participants longer to find the target. Here we found a larger effect of guidance than in a condition with shorter RTs. Experiment 2 gave participants prior exposure to the display context. The data again showed that with more time participants could implement guidance to help find the target, provided that there was something in the search stimuli locations to guide attention to. The data suggest that, although the benefit in a standard contextual cueing task is unlikely to be a result of guidance, guidance can play a role if it is given time to develop.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Psychology -- Research, Attention -- Testing
Journal or Publication Title: Visual Cognition
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 1350-6285
Date: August 2008
Volume: Vol.16
Number: No.6
Page Range: pp. 804-825
Identification Number: 10.1080/13506280701751224
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) (NIMH)
References: Biederman, I. (1972). Perceiving real-world scenes. Science, 177, 77-80. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 443-446 Brockmole, J.R., Castelhano, M.S., & Henderson, J.M. (2006). Contextual Cueing in Naturalistic Scenes: Global and Local Contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 699-706. Brockmole, J.R., & Henderson, J.M. (2006a). Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cueing in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1177-1187. Brockmole, J.R., & Henderson, J.M. (2006b). Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition, 13, 99-108. Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 170-178. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360-365. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 224-234. Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., & Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets. J. Exp. Psychol: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 32-39. Endo, N., & Takeda, Y. (2004). Selective learning of spatial configuration and object identity in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(2), 293-302. Hoffmann, J., & Sebald, A. (2005). Local contextual cuing in visual search. Experimental Psychology, 52(1), 31-38. Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Selective Attention Modulates Implicit Learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (A), 54(4), 1105-1124. Jiang, Y., & Leung A.W. (2005). Implicit learning of ignored visual context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 100-106. Jiang, Y., Leung, A. & Burks, S. (submitted). Source of individual differences in spatial context learning. Memory & Cognition. Jiang, Y., Song, J-H, & Rigas, A (2005). High-capacity spatial contextual memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(3), 524-529. Jiang, Y. & Wagner, L.C. (2004). What is learned in spatial contextual cuing – configuration or individual locations? Perception & Psychophysics, 66(3), 454-463. Kunar, M.A., Flusberg, S.J., & Wolfe, J.M. (2006). Contextual cueing by global features. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 1204 - 1216. Kunar, M.A., Flusberg, S.J., & Wolfe, J.M. (submitted). The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search. Perception & Psychophysics. Kunar, M.A., Flusberg, S.J., Horowitz, T.S., & Wolfe, J.M., (2007). Does contextual cueing guide the deployment of attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 816-828. Kunar, M.A., Michod, K.O., & Wolfe, J.M., (2005). When we use context in contextual cueing: Evidence from multiple target locations. Journal of Vision, 5, 412a. Lleras, A., & Von Mühlenen, A. (2004). Spatial context and top-down strategies in visual search. Spatial Vision, 17(4-5), 465-482. Oliva, A., Wolfe, J. & Arsenio, H. (2004). Panoramic search: The interaction of memory and vision in search through a familiar scene. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 30, 1132-1146. Olsen, I.R. & Chun, M. M. (2002). Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition, 9(3), 273-302. Pelli, D. G. (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies, Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442. Peterson, M.S. & Kramer, A.F. (2001). Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1239-1249. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136. Tseng, Y., & Li, C.R. (2004). Oculomotor correlates of context-guided learning in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(8), 1363-1378. Wolfe, J.M., Klempen, N. & Dahlen, K. (2000). Postattentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 693-716. Wolfe, J. M., Oliva, A., Horowitz, T. S., Butcher, S. J., Bompas A. (2002). Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks. Vision Research, 42, 2985–3004
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/454

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us