Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Henmi, Masayuki and Copas, John B.. (2010) Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias. Statistics in Medicine, Vol.29 (No.29). pp. 2969-2983. ISSN 0277-6715

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.4029

Abstract

The DerSimonian-Laird confidence interval for the average treatment effect in meta-analysis is widely used in practice when there is heterogeneity between studies. However, it is well known that its coverage probability (the probability that the interval actually includes the true value) can be substantially below the target level of 95 per cent. It can also be very sensitive to publication bias. In this paper, we propose a new confidence interval that has better coverage than the DerSimonian-Laird method, and that is less sensitive to publication bias. The key idea is to note that fixed effects estimates are less sensitive to such biases than random effects estimates, since they put relatively more weight on the larger studies and relatively less weight on the smaller studies. Whereas the DerSimonian-Laird interval is centred on a random effects estimate, we centre our confidence interval on a fixed effects estimate, but allow for heterogeneity by including an assessment of the extra uncertainty induced by the random effects setting. Properties of the resulting confidence interval are studied by simulation and compared with other random effects confidence intervals that have been proposed in the literature. An example is briefly discussed. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
R Medicine
Q Science > QA Mathematics
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Statistics
Journal or Publication Title: Statistics in Medicine
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
ISSN: 0277-6715
Date: 20 December 2010
Volume: Vol.29
Number: No.29
Number of Pages: 15
Page Range: pp. 2969-2983
Identification Number: 10.1002/sim.4029
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), KAKENHI
Grant number: GR/S67807/01 (EPSRC), 20700261
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/4550

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us