Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Too much of a good thing? On the growth effects of the EU's regional policy

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Becker, Sascha O., Egger, Peter and von Ehrlich, Maximilian (2010) Too much of a good thing? On the growth effects of the EU's regional policy. Discussion Paper. Coventry: Centre for Economic Policy Research. (CEPR Discussion Paper. (Unpublished)

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://www.cepr.org/pubs/dps/DP8043.asp

Abstract

The European Union (EU) provides grants to disadvantaged regions of member states from two pools, the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund. The main goal of the associated transfers is to facilitate convergence of poor regions (in terms of per-capita income) to the EU average. We use data at the NUTS3 level from the last two EU budgetary periods (1994-99 and 2000-06). Using generalized propensity score estimation, we analyze to which extent the goal of fostering growth in the target regions was achieved with the funds provided and whether more transfers generated stronger growth effects or not. We find that, overall, EU transfers enable faster growth in the recipient regions as intended, but we estimate that in 36% of the recipient regions the transfer intensity exceeds the aggregate efficiency maximizing level and in 18% percent of the regions a reduction of transfers would not even reduce their growth. We conclude that some reallocation of the funds across target regions would lead to higher aggregate growth in the EU and could generate even faster convergence than the current scheme does.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Discussion Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Series Name: CEPR Discussion Paper
Publisher: Centre for Economic Policy Research
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: October 2010
Number: No.8043
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Unpublished
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE), German Science Foundation (DFG)
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/45515

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us