Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Should we worry about memory loss?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Perks, O. F. J., Hammond, Simon D., Pennycook, Simon J. and Jarvis, Stephen A.. (2011) Should we worry about memory loss? ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, Vol.38 (No.4). pp. 69-74. ISSN 0163-5999

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1964218.1964230

Abstract

In recent years the High Performance Computing (HPC) industry has benefited from the development of higher density multi-core processors. With recent chips capable of executing up to 32 tasks in parallel, this rate of growth also shows no sign of slowing. Alongside the development of denser micro-processors has been the considerably more modest rate of improvement in random access memory (RAM) capacities. The effect has been that the available memory-per-core has reduced and current projections suggest that this is still set to reduce further. In this paper we present three studies into the use and measurement of memory in parallel applications; our aim is to capture, understand and, if possible, reduce the memory-per-core needed by complete, multi-component applications. First, we present benchmarked memory usage and runtimes of a six scientific benchmarks, which represent algorithms that are common to a host of production-grade codes. Memory usage of each benchmark is measured and reported for a variety of compiler toolkits, and we show greater than 30% variation in memory high-water mark requirements between compilers. Second, we utilise this benchmark data combined with runtime data, to simulate, via the Maui scheduler simulator, the effect on a multi-science workflow if memory-per-core is reduced from 1.5GB-per-core to only 256MB. Finally, we present initial results from a new memory profiling tool currently in development at the University of Warwick. This tool is applied to a finite-element benchmark and is able to map high-water-mark memory allocations to individual program functions. This demonstrates a lightweight and accurate method of identifying potential memory problems, a technique we expect to become commonplace as memory capacities decrease.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA76 Electronic computers. Computer science. Computer software
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Computer Science
Journal or Publication Title: ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
Publisher: ACM, New York
ISSN: 0163-5999
Date: March 2011
Volume: Vol.38
Number: No.4
Page Range: pp. 69-74
Identification Number: 10.1145/1964218.1964230
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Related URLs:
  • Publisher
  • Related item in WRAP
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/45684

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us