Peter, Fabienne (2007) Rawls' idea of public reason and democratic legitimacy. Politics and Ethics Review, Vol.3 (No.1). pp. 129-143. doi:10.3366/per.2007.3.1.129

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Critics and defenders of Rawls’ idea of public reason have tended to neglect the relationship between this idea and his conception of democratic legitimacy. I shall argue that Rawls’ idea of public reason can be interpreted
in two different ways, and that the two interpretations support two different conceptions of legitimacy. What I call the substantive interpretation of Rawls’ idea of public reason demands that it applies not just to the process of democratic decision-making, but that it extends to the substantive justification of democratic decisions. I shall argue against this interpretation and suggest a procedural
interpretation instead. On this view, public reason is invoked when it comes to the political justification of the principles that should govern the process of democratic decision-making, but not – at least not directly – in relation to the content of public deliberation.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Philosophy
Journal or Publication Title:	Politics and Ethics Review
Publisher:	Edinburgh University Press
ISSN:	1755-0882
Official Date:	2007
Dates:	Date Event 2007 Published
Volume:	Vol.3
Number:	No.1
Page Range:	pp. 129-143
DOI:	10.3366/per.2007.3.1.129
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Description:	Also presented at Rawls Workshop, University of Bochum, February 2012
Related URLs:	http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10....

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item