Fuller, Steve, 1959-. (2011) Why does history matter to the science studies disciplines? : a case for giving the past back its future. Journal of the Philosophy of History, Vol.5 (No.3). pp. 562-585. ISSN 1872-261X

Preview

Text WRAP_Fuller_JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY - revised.pdf - Accepted Version Download (268Kb) | Preview

Abstract

Science and technology studies (STS) has perhaps provided the most ambitious set of challenges to the boundary separating history and philosophy of science since the 19th century idealists and positivists. STS is normally associated with `social constructivism', which when applied to history of science highlights the malleability of the modal structure of reality. Specifically, changes to what is (e.g. by the addition or removal of ideas or things) implies changes to what has been, can be and might be. Latour's account of Pasteur's scientific achievement is a case in point. Two polar attitudes towards the world's modal malleability are identified: over- and under- determination, which correspond, respectively, to a belief in the inevitability and the precariousness of science as a form of knowledge. The distinctness of these positions reflects a cordon sanitaire between the history and the philosophy of science. Consequently, historical agents are not given full voice as constructors of reality: They are either quarantined to a foreign realm called `the past' by the historian or selectively assimilated to an imperial present by the philosopher. The second half of the essay explores what it might mean to restore a robust sense of reality construction to the historical agents. My case in point here is that of the 13th century Franciscan friar, Roger Bacon, who has been alternatively seen as a mad medieval or a proto-modernist. To give Bacon full voice would involve taking the future that he envisaged as a normative benchmark for judging our own world.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	Q Science > Q Science (General)
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Science -- History, Science -- Philosophy
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of the Philosophy of History
Publisher:	Brill
ISSN:	1872-261X
Date:	2011
Volume:	Vol.5
Number:	No.3
Page Range:	pp. 562-585
Identification Number:	10.1163/187226311X599952
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
References:	Burkhardt, R. (1970).’Lamarck, Evolution, and the Politics of Science’. Journal of the History of Biology 3: 275-298. Butler, J. (2004). Precarious Life. London: Verso. Collins, H.M. (1981). ‘Stages in the empirical programme of relativism’. Social Studies of Science 11: 3-10. Daston, L. and Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Fuller, S. (1988). Social Epistemology. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press. Fuller, S. (2000). Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Fuller, S. (2006). The Philosophy of Science and Technology Studies. London: Routledge. Fuller, S. (2007). New Frontiers in Science and Technology Studies. Oxford: Polity. Fuller, S. (2008a). Dissent over Descent. Cambridge UK: Icon Books. Fuller, S. (2008b). ‘The Normative Turn: Counterfactuals and a Philosophical Historiography of Science’. Isis 99: 576-584. Fuller, S. (2010a). ‘Freedom and Determinism in the 21st Century: Prolegomena to the Rewriting of History’ in Questioning Nineteenth-Century Assumptions about Knowledge, vol. 1, Determinism, ed. R.E. Lee. (Albany NY: SUNY Press), pp. 5-40. Fuller, S. (2010b). Science: The Art of Living. Durham UK: Acumen. Fuller, S. (2011). Humanity 2.0: The Past, Present and Future of What It Means to Be Human. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Fuller, S. and Collier, J. (2004). Philosophy, Rhetoric and the End of Knowledge (Orig. 1993 by Fuller). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Hacking, I. (2002). Historical Ontology. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Harrington, A. (2001). ‘Dilthey, Empathy and Verstehen’. European Journal of Social Theory 4: 311-29. Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd edn. (Orig. 1962). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lakatos, I. (1981). ‘History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions’. In I. Hacking, ed., Scientific Revolutions. (Pp. 107-27). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Latour, B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s Hope. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Lepenies, W. (1988). Between Literature and Science: the Rise of Sociology. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Lindberg, D. (1982). ‘On the Applicability of Mathematics to Nature: Roger Bacon and His Predecessors’. British Journal for the History of Science 15: 3-25. Löwith, K. (1948). Meaning in History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. South Bend IN: Notre Dame Press. MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent Rational Animals. La Salle IL: Open Court Press. Mannheim, K. (1936 [1929]). Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt Brace and World. McCalman, I. and Pickering, P., eds. (2010). Historical Re-enactment: From Realism to Affect. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Meyer, S. (2009). Signature in the Cell. New York: HarperOne. Neiman, S. (2002). Evil in Modern Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Passmore, J. (1970). The Perfectibility of Man. London: Duckworth. Popper, K. (1972). Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rasmussen, N. (1997). ‘The Mid-century Biophysics Bubble: Hiroshima and the Biological Revolution in America, Revisited.’ History of Science 35: 245-91. Skinner, Q. (1969) 'Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas'. History and Theory 8 (1), 3–53. Smail, D.L. (2007). Deep History and the Brain. Berkeley: University of California Press. Turner, S. (2007). ‘Social Theory as Cognitive Neuroscience’. European Journal of Social Theory 10: 357-74. Weber, M. (1963 [1922]). The Sociology of Religion. Boston: Beacon Press.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/46529

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item