Anaki, D. & Henik, A. (2003). Is there a “strength effect” in automatic semantic priming? Memory & Cognition, 31, 262-272.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261-265.
Bassok, M., & Medin, D. L. (1997). Birds of a feather flock together: Similarity judgments with semantically rich stimuli. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 311-336.
Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory & Cognition, 8, 493-512.
Becker, S., Moscovitch, M., Behrmann, M., & Joordens, S. (1997). Long-term semantic priming: A computational account and empirical evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1059-1082.
Bodner, G. E. & Masson, M. E. J. (2001). Prime validity affects masked repetition priming: Evidence for an episodic resource account of priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 616-647.
Bodner, G. E. & Masson, M. E. J. (2003). Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 645-652.
Chwilla, D. J., Hagoort, P. & Brown, C. E. (1998). The mechanism underlying backward priming in a lexical decision task: Spreading activation versus semantic matching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 531-560.
Clark, H. H. (1983). Making sense of nonce sense. In G. B. Flores d’Arcais and R. J. Jarvella (Eds.), The Process of Language Unerstanding (pp. 297-331). New York: John Wiley.
Clark, E. V., & Berman, R. A. (1987). Types of linguistic knowledge: Interpreting and producing compound nouns. Journal of Child Language, 14, 547-567.
Cohen, B., & Murphy, G. L. (1984). Models of concepts. Cognitive Science, 8, 27-58.
Collins, A. M. & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
Connell, L. & Keane, M. T. (2004). What plausibly affects plausibility? Concept coherence and distributional word coherence as factors influencing plausibility judgments. Memory & Cognition, 32, 185-197.
Connell, L. & Keane, M. T. (2006). A model of plausibility. Cognitive Science, 30, 95-120.
Coolen, R., van Jaarsveld, H. J. & Schreuder, R. (1991). The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds. Memory & Cognition, 19, 341-352.
Costello, F. J. & Keane, M. T. (2000). Efficient creativity: Constraint-guided conceptual combination. Cognitive Science, 24, 299-349.
de Groot, A. M. B. (1984). Primed lexical decision: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime-target pairs and the stimulus-onset asynchrony of prime and target. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 253-280.
de Groot, A. M. B. (1985). Word-context effects in word naming and lexical decision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 281-297.
de Mornay Davies, P. (1998). Automatic semantic priming: The contribution of lexical- and semantic-level processes. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 389-412.
den Heyer, K., Briand, K. & Smith, L. (1985). Automatic and strategic effects in semantic priming: An examination of Becker’s verification model. Memory & Cognition, 13, 228-232.
Devereux, B., & Costello, F. J. (2005). Investigating the relations used in conceptual combination. Artificial Intelligence Review, 24, 489-515.
Downing, P. (1977). On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language, 53, 810-842.
Dosher, B. A., & Rosedale, G. (1989). Integrated retrieval cues as a mechanism for priming in retrieval from memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 191-211.
Doumas, L. A. A., Hummel, J. E., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2008). A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts. Psychological Review, 115, 1-43.
Dowty, D. (1990). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547-619.
Estes, Z. (2003a). A tale of two similarities: Comparison and integration in conceptual combination. Cognitive Science, 27, 911-921.
Estes, Z. (2003b). Attributive and relational processes in nominal combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 304-319.
Estes, Z., & Jones, L. L. (2006). Priming via relational similarity: A COPPER HORSE is faster
when seen through a GLASS EYE. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 89-101.
Estes, Z., & Jones, L. L. (2008). Relational processing in conceptual combination and analogy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 385-386.
Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E. W., De Ochoa-Dewald, E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research, 1146, 75-84.
Fedorenko, E., Gibson, E., & Rohde, D. (2007). The nature of working memory in linguistic, arithmetic and spatial integration processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 246-269.
Ferretti, T. R., Gagne, C. L., & McRae, K. (2003). Thematic role focusing by participle inflections: Evidence from conceptual combination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 118-126.
Ferretti, T. R., Kutas, M., & McRae, K. (2007). Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 182-196.
Ferretti, T. R., McRae, K., & Hatherell, A. (2001). Integrating verbs, situation schemes, and thematic role concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 516-547.
Fischler, I. (1977). Semantic facilitation without association in a lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 5, 335-339.
Fischler, I. & Bloom, P. A. (1979). Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 1-20.
Forster, K. I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 465-495.
Gagné, C. L. (2000). Relation-based combinations versus property-based combinations: A test of the CARIN theory and the dual-process theory of conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 365-389.
Gagné, C. L., & Murphy, G. L. (1996). Influence of discourse context on feature availability in conceptual combination. Discourse Processes, 22, 79-101.
Gagné, C. L., & Shoben, E. (1997). The influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 71-87.
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2006). Relation availability was not confounded with familiarity or plausibility in Gagné and Shoben (1997): Comment on Wisniewski and Murphy (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1431-1437.
Garrod, S. & Terras, M. (2000). The contribution of lexical and situational knowledge to resolving discourse roles: Bonding and resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 526-544.
Gildea, D. & Jurafsky, D. (2002). Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 28, 245-288.
Glucksberg, S., & Estes, Z. (2000). Feature accessibility in conceptual combination: Effects of context-induced relevance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 510-515.
Haarmann, H. J., Davelaar, E. J., & Usher, M. (2003). Individual differences in semantic short-term memory capacity and reading comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 320-345.
Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438-441.
Henik, A., Friedrich, F. J., Tzelgov, J., & Tramer, S. (1994). Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming. Memory & Cognition, 22, 157-168.
Hess, D. J., Foss, D. J., & Carroll, P. (1995). Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 62-82.
Hodgson, J. M. (1991). Information constraints on pre-lexical priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 169-205.
Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104, 427-466.
Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2003). A symbolic connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. Psychological Review, 110, 220-264.
Hutchison, K. A. (2002). The effect of asymmetrical association on positive and negative semantic priming. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1263-1276.
Hutchison, K. A. (2003). Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 785-813.
Hutchison, K. A. (2007). Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 645-662.
Hutchison, K. A., Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M. (2008). Predicting semantic priming at the item level. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1036-1066.
Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H. & Johnson, J. D. (2001). With great expectations, can two “wrongs” prime a “right”? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1451-1463.
Jarema, G., Busson, C., Nikolova, R., Tsapkini, K., & Libben, G. (1999). Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 68, 362-369.
Jones, L. L., Estes, Z., & Marsh, R. L. (2008). An asymmetric effect of relational integration on recognition memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1169-1176.
Jones, M. & Love, B. C. (2007). The role of roles in determining similarity. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 196-231.
Kay, P., & Zimmer, K. (1976). On the semantics of compounds and genitives in English. In R. Underhill (Ed.), Sixth California Linguistics Association Conference Proceedings. San Diego State University.
Kiefer, M., Ahlegian, M., & Spitzer, M. (2005). Working memory capacity, indirect semantic priming, and Stroop interference: Pattern of interindividual prefrontal performance differences in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychology, 19, 332-344.
Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence, R. I.: Brown University Press.
Landauer, T. K. & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.
Lees, R. B. (1963). The Grammar of English Nominalizations. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Levi, J. N. (1978). The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. New York: Academic Press.
Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84, 50-64.
Lin, E. L., & Murphy, G. L. (2001). Thematic relations in adults’ concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 3-28.
Lucas, M. (2000). Semantic priming without association: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 618-630.
Lupker, S. J. (1984). Semantic priming without association: A second look. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 709-733.
Maguire, P., Devereux, B., Costello, F., & Cater, A. (2007). A reanalysis of the CARIN theory of conceptual combination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 811-821.
Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 3-23.
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Spreading activation versus compound-cue accounts of priming: Mediated priming revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1155-1172.
McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1995). Conceptual combinations and relational contexts in free association and in priming in lexical decision and naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 527-533.
McNamara, T. P. (1992a). Priming and constraints it places on theories of memory and retrieval. Psychological Review, 99, 650-662.
McNamara, T. P. (1992b). Theories of priming: I. Associative distance and lag. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1173-1190.
McNamara, T. P. (1994). Theories of priming: II. Types of primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 507-520.
McNamara, T. P. (2005). Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition. New York: Psychology Press.
McRae, K. & Boisvert, S. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 558-572.
McRae, K., de Sa, V. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 99-130.
McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 283-312.
Meyer, D. E. & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W. & Ruddy, M. G. (1975). Loci of contextual effects in visual word recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt (Ed.), Attention and Performance V (pp. 98-118). New York: Academic Press.
Moors, A. & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297-326.
Moss, H. E., Ostrin, R. K., Tyler, L. K. & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1995). Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 863-883.
Murphy, G. L. (1988). Comprehending complex concepts. Cognitive Science, 12, 529-562.
Murphy, G. L. (2001). Causes of taxonomic sorting by adults: A test of the thematic-to-taxonomic shift. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 834-839.
Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Murphy, G. L. & Wisniewski, E. J. (2006). Familiarity and plausibility in conceptual combination: Reply to Gagné and Spalding (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1438-1442.
Nation, K., Adams, J. W., Bowyer-Crane, C. A., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Working memory deficits in poor comprehenders reflect underlying language impairments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 139-158.
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: Evidence from semantic priming. Cognition, 70, B1-B13.
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254.
Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic Processes in Reading: Visual Word Recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Neely, J. H. & Keefe, D. E. (1989). Semantic context effects on visual word processing: A hybrid prospective-retrospective processing theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 24, pp. 207-248). New York: Academic Press.
Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E. & Ross, K. L. (1989). Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1003-1019.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L. & Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 402-407.
Perea, M. & Rosa, E. (2002). Does the proportion of associatively related pairs modulate the associative priming effect at very brief stimulus-onset asynchronies? Acta Psychologica, 110, 103-124.
Plaut, D. C. & Booth, J. R. (2000). Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computacional support for a sin