Estes, Zachary, 1973- and Jones, Lara L. . (2009) Integrative priming occurs rapidly and uncontrollably during lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol.138 (No.1). pp. 112-130. ISSN 0096-3445

Preview

PDF WRAP_Estes_Estes__Jones_JEPG.pdf - Draft Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (293Kb)

Abstract

Lexical priming, whereby a prime word facilitates recognition of a related target word (e.g., nurse ? doctor), is typically attributed to association strength, semantic similarity, or compound familiarity. Here, the authors demonstrate a novel type of lexical priming that occurs among unassociated, dissimilar, and unfamiliar concepts (e.g., horse ? doctor). Specifically, integrative priming occurs when a prime word can be easily integrated with a target word to create a unitary representation. Across several manipulations of timing (stimulus onset asynchrony) and list context (relatedness proportion), lexical decisions for the target word were facilitated when it could be integrated with the prime word. Moreover, integrative priming was dissociated from both associative priming and semantic priming but was comparable in terms of both prevalence (across participants) and magnitude (within participants). This observation of integrative priming challenges present models of lexical priming, such as spreading activation, distributed representation, expectancy, episodic retrieval, and compound cue models. The authors suggest that integrative priming may be explained by a role activation model of relational integration.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Lexical grammar, Priming (psychology), Word recognition
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Publisher:	American Psychological Association
ISSN:	0096-3445
Date:	February 2009
Volume:	Vol.138
Number:	No.1
Number of Pages:	19
Page Range:	pp. 112-130
Identification Number:	10.1037/a0014677
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Version or Related Resource:	Portions of this research were presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society (Houston, TX).
References:	Anaki, D. & Henik, A. (2003). Is there a “strength effect” in automatic semantic priming? Memory & Cognition, 31, 262-272. Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261-265. Bassok, M., & Medin, D. L. (1997). Birds of a feather flock together: Similarity judgments with semantically rich stimuli. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 311-336. Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory & Cognition, 8, 493-512. Becker, S., Moscovitch, M., Behrmann, M., & Joordens, S. (1997). Long-term semantic priming: A computational account and empirical evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1059-1082. Bodner, G. E. & Masson, M. E. J. (2001). Prime validity affects masked repetition priming: Evidence for an episodic resource account of priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 616-647. Bodner, G. E. & Masson, M. E. J. (2003). Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 645-652. Chwilla, D. J., Hagoort, P. & Brown, C. E. (1998). The mechanism underlying backward priming in a lexical decision task: Spreading activation versus semantic matching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 531-560. Clark, H. H. (1983). Making sense of nonce sense. In G. B. Flores d’Arcais and R. J. Jarvella (Eds.), The Process of Language Unerstanding (pp. 297-331). New York: John Wiley. Clark, E. V., & Berman, R. A. (1987). Types of linguistic knowledge: Interpreting and producing compound nouns. Journal of Child Language, 14, 547-567. Cohen, B., & Murphy, G. L. (1984). Models of concepts. Cognitive Science, 8, 27-58. Collins, A. M. & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428. Connell, L. & Keane, M. T. (2004). What plausibly affects plausibility? Concept coherence and distributional word coherence as factors influencing plausibility judgments. Memory & Cognition, 32, 185-197. Connell, L. & Keane, M. T. (2006). A model of plausibility. Cognitive Science, 30, 95-120. Coolen, R., van Jaarsveld, H. J. & Schreuder, R. (1991). The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds. Memory & Cognition, 19, 341-352. Costello, F. J. & Keane, M. T. (2000). Efficient creativity: Constraint-guided conceptual combination. Cognitive Science, 24, 299-349. de Groot, A. M. B. (1984). Primed lexical decision: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime-target pairs and the stimulus-onset asynchrony of prime and target. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 253-280. de Groot, A. M. B. (1985). Word-context effects in word naming and lexical decision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 281-297. de Mornay Davies, P. (1998). Automatic semantic priming: The contribution of lexical- and semantic-level processes. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 389-412. den Heyer, K., Briand, K. & Smith, L. (1985). Automatic and strategic effects in semantic priming: An examination of Becker’s verification model. Memory & Cognition, 13, 228-232. Devereux, B., & Costello, F. J. (2005). Investigating the relations used in conceptual combination. Artificial Intelligence Review, 24, 489-515. Downing, P. (1977). On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language, 53, 810-842. Dosher, B. A., & Rosedale, G. (1989). Integrated retrieval cues as a mechanism for priming in retrieval from memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 191-211. Doumas, L. A. A., Hummel, J. E., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2008). A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts. Psychological Review, 115, 1-43. Dowty, D. (1990). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547-619. Estes, Z. (2003a). A tale of two similarities: Comparison and integration in conceptual combination. Cognitive Science, 27, 911-921. Estes, Z. (2003b). Attributive and relational processes in nominal combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 304-319. Estes, Z., & Jones, L. L. (2006). Priming via relational similarity: A COPPER HORSE is faster when seen through a GLASS EYE. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 89-101. Estes, Z., & Jones, L. L. (2008). Relational processing in conceptual combination and analogy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 385-386. Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E. W., De Ochoa-Dewald, E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research, 1146, 75-84. Fedorenko, E., Gibson, E., & Rohde, D. (2007). The nature of working memory in linguistic, arithmetic and spatial integration processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 246-269. Ferretti, T. R., Gagne, C. L., & McRae, K. (2003). Thematic role focusing by participle inflections: Evidence from conceptual combination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 118-126. Ferretti, T. R., Kutas, M., & McRae, K. (2007). Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 182-196. Ferretti, T. R., McRae, K., & Hatherell, A. (2001). Integrating verbs, situation schemes, and thematic role concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 516-547. Fischler, I. (1977). Semantic facilitation without association in a lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 5, 335-339. Fischler, I. & Bloom, P. A. (1979). Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 1-20. Forster, K. I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 465-495. Gagné, C. L. (2000). Relation-based combinations versus property-based combinations: A test of the CARIN theory and the dual-process theory of conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 365-389. Gagné, C. L., & Murphy, G. L. (1996). Influence of discourse context on feature availability in conceptual combination. Discourse Processes, 22, 79-101. Gagné, C. L., & Shoben, E. (1997). The influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 71-87. Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2006). Relation availability was not confounded with familiarity or plausibility in Gagné and Shoben (1997): Comment on Wisniewski and Murphy (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1431-1437. Garrod, S. & Terras, M. (2000). The contribution of lexical and situational knowledge to resolving discourse roles: Bonding and resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 526-544. Gildea, D. & Jurafsky, D. (2002). Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 28, 245-288. Glucksberg, S., & Estes, Z. (2000). Feature accessibility in conceptual combination: Effects of context-induced relevance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 510-515. Haarmann, H. J., Davelaar, E. J., & Usher, M. (2003). Individual differences in semantic short-term memory capacity and reading comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 320-345. Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438-441. Henik, A., Friedrich, F. J., Tzelgov, J., & Tramer, S. (1994). Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming. Memory & Cognition, 22, 157-168. Hess, D. J., Foss, D. J., & Carroll, P. (1995). Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 62-82. Hodgson, J. M. (1991). Information constraints on pre-lexical priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 169-205. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104, 427-466. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2003). A symbolic connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. Psychological Review, 110, 220-264. Hutchison, K. A. (2002). The effect of asymmetrical association on positive and negative semantic priming. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1263-1276. Hutchison, K. A. (2003). Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 785-813. Hutchison, K. A. (2007). Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 645-662. Hutchison, K. A., Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M. (2008). Predicting semantic priming at the item level. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1036-1066. Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H. & Johnson, J. D. (2001). With great expectations, can two “wrongs” prime a “right”? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1451-1463. Jarema, G., Busson, C., Nikolova, R., Tsapkini, K., & Libben, G. (1999). Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 68, 362-369. Jones, L. L., Estes, Z., & Marsh, R. L. (2008). An asymmetric effect of relational integration on recognition memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1169-1176. Jones, M. & Love, B. C. (2007). The role of roles in determining similarity. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 196-231. Kay, P., & Zimmer, K. (1976). On the semantics of compounds and genitives in English. In R. Underhill (Ed.), Sixth California Linguistics Association Conference Proceedings. San Diego State University. Kiefer, M., Ahlegian, M., & Spitzer, M. (2005). Working memory capacity, indirect semantic priming, and Stroop interference: Pattern of interindividual prefrontal performance differences in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychology, 19, 332-344. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence, R. I.: Brown University Press. Landauer, T. K. & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. Lees, R. B. (1963). The Grammar of English Nominalizations. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Levi, J. N. (1978). The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. New York: Academic Press. Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84, 50-64. Lin, E. L., & Murphy, G. L. (2001). Thematic relations in adults’ concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 3-28. Lucas, M. (2000). Semantic priming without association: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 618-630. Lupker, S. J. (1984). Semantic priming without association: A second look. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 709-733. Maguire, P., Devereux, B., Costello, F., & Cater, A. (2007). A reanalysis of the CARIN theory of conceptual combination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 811-821. Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 3-23. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Spreading activation versus compound-cue accounts of priming: Mediated priming revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1155-1172. McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1995). Conceptual combinations and relational contexts in free association and in priming in lexical decision and naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 527-533. McNamara, T. P. (1992a). Priming and constraints it places on theories of memory and retrieval. Psychological Review, 99, 650-662. McNamara, T. P. (1992b). Theories of priming: I. Associative distance and lag. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1173-1190. McNamara, T. P. (1994). Theories of priming: II. Types of primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 507-520. McNamara, T. P. (2005). Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition. New York: Psychology Press. McRae, K. & Boisvert, S. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 558-572. McRae, K., de Sa, V. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 99-130. McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 283-312. Meyer, D. E. & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234. Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W. & Ruddy, M. G. (1975). Loci of contextual effects in visual word recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt (Ed.), Attention and Performance V (pp. 98-118). New York: Academic Press. Moors, A. & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297-326. Moss, H. E., Ostrin, R. K., Tyler, L. K. & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1995). Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 863-883. Murphy, G. L. (1988). Comprehending complex concepts. Cognitive Science, 12, 529-562. Murphy, G. L. (2001). Causes of taxonomic sorting by adults: A test of the thematic-to-taxonomic shift. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 834-839. Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Murphy, G. L. & Wisniewski, E. J. (2006). Familiarity and plausibility in conceptual combination: Reply to Gagné and Spalding (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1438-1442. Nation, K., Adams, J. W., Bowyer-Crane, C. A., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Working memory deficits in poor comprehenders reflect underlying language impairments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 139-158. Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: Evidence from semantic priming. Cognition, 70, B1-B13. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic Processes in Reading: Visual Word Recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Neely, J. H. & Keefe, D. E. (1989). Semantic context effects on visual word processing: A hybrid prospective-retrospective processing theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 24, pp. 207-248). New York: Academic Press. Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E. & Ross, K. L. (1989). Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1003-1019. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L. & Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 402-407. Perea, M. & Rosa, E. (2002). Does the proportion of associatively related pairs modulate the associative priming effect at very brief stimulus-onset asynchronies? Acta Psychologica, 110, 103-124. Plaut, D. C. & Booth, J. R. (2000). Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computacional support for a sin
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/467

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item