The emerging political economy of Humanity 2.0
Fuller, Steve, 1959-. (2012) The emerging political economy of Humanity 2.0. Innovation :The European Journal of Social Science Research, Vol.25 (No.1). pp. 79-92. ISSN 1351-1610
WRAP_Fuller_INNOVATION ARTICLE.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 22 July 2013.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660408
'Humanity 2.0' refers to the title of my recent book (Humanity 2.0: What It Means to Be Human Past, Present and Future, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), in which I present humanity as historically poised to re-negotiate its sense of collective identity. There are at least five reasons for this, which are addressed in this paper: (a) the prominence of digital technology in shaping everyday life and human self-understanding; (b) the advances (both promised and realized) in biotechnology that aim to extend the human condition, perhaps even into a phase that might be called 'trans-' or 'post-' human; (c) a growing sense of ecological consciousness (much of it promoted by a sense of impending global catastrophe); (d) a growing awareness of the biological similarity between humans and other animals, reviving doubts about strictly naturalistic criteria for demarcating the 'human'; and (e) an increasing sense of human affection and sympathy migrating to animals and even androids, during a period when national health budgets are stretched perhaps to an unprecedented extent. The article is structured into two parts. The first part follows the humanistic implications of the claim that the computer was the innovation that most changed the human condition in the twentieth century. The overriding significance of the computer provides a gateway to our emerging sense of 'Humanity 2.0'. The second part focuses on the implications of Humanity 2.0 for welfare policy, concluding with a thought experiment concerning health policy. Here the basic point is that the ontological framework for conceptualizing the just liberal society is subtly shifting from the potential to the virtual as the normative benchmark of our humanity.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HM Sociology|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Humanity, Technology -- Social aspects, Welfare state|
|Journal or Publication Title:||Innovation :The European Journal of Social Science Research|
|Page Range:||pp. 79-92|
|Access rights to Published version:||Restricted or Subscription Access|
|References:||Aharon, I. and Bourgeois-Gironde, S. (2011). „From neuroeconomics to genetics: The intertemporal choices case as an example‟. In R. Ebstein et al. (eds.), From DNA to Social Cognition. (Pp. 233-244) London: Wiley-Blackwell. Appleyard, B. (2011). The Brain is Wider than the Sky. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Armstrong, R. (2012). Living Architecture: How Synthetic Biology Can Remake Our Cities and Reshape Our Lives. TED e-book. Barben, D.; Fisher, E.; Selin, C.; Guston, D. (2008). „Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement and Integration‟. (Pp. 979-1000) In E. Hackett et al. (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Berlin, I. (1958). Two Concepts of Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Berry, D. (2011). The Philosophy of Software. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Borghol, N, et al. (2011). „Associations with early-life socio-economic position in adult DNA methylation‟. International Journal of Epidemiology. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr147. Bourke, J. (2011). What It Means to Be Human: Reflections from 1791 to the Present. London: Virago. Briggle, A. (2010). A Rich Bioethics. South Bend IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chan, S.; Zee Y.-K.; Jayson, G.; Harris, J. (2011). “‟Risky‟ research and participants‟ interests: the ethics of phase 2C clinical trials”. Clinical Ethics 6: 91-96. Chatterjee, A. (2007) „Cosmetic neurology and cosmetic surgery: Parallels, predictions and challenges‟. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 16: 129–37. Dawkins, R. (1982) The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press. De Grey, A. (2007) Ending Aging: The Rejuvenation Breakthroughs that Could Reverse Human Aging in Our Lifetime. New York: St Martin‟s Press. Dickens, P. (2000) Social Darwinism: Linking Evolutionary Thought to Social Theory. Milton Keynes UK: Open University Press. Economist (2006). „Epigenetics: Learning without Learning‟. 21 September. Economist (2010). „This house believes the development of computing was the most significant technological advance of the 20th century.‟ (On-line debate, 19-29 October) http://www.economist.com/debate/days/view/598#mod_module Fukuyama, F. (2003). Our Posthuman Future. London: Picador. Fuller, S. (2006). The New Sociological Imagination. London: Sage. Fuller, S. (2008). „The normative turn - Counterfactuals and a philosophical historiography of science‟. Isis 99(3): 576-84. Fuller, S. (2010). Science: The Art of Living. Durham UK: Acumen. Fuller, S. (2011). Humanity 2.0: What It Means to Be Human Past, Present and Future. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Giridharadas, A. (2010). „Where a cellphone is still cutting edge‟. The New York Times. 11 April. Greenfield, S. (2003). Tomorrow’s People: How 21st Century Technology Is Changing the Way We Think and Feel. London: Allen Lane. Greenberg, G. (2011). „Inside the battle to define mental illness‟. Wired. January. Hope, J. (2008). Biobazaar: The Open Source Revolution and Biotechnology. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Hirsch, F.(1976). The Social Limits to Growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Kurzweil, R. (2005) The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking. Langlitz, N. (2010). "The Persistence of the Subjective in Neuropsychopharmacology. Observations of Contemporary Hallucinogen Research". History of the Human Sciences. 23 (1): 37-57. Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row. McKenzie, R. and G. Tullock. (1981). The New World of Economics: Explorations into the Human Experience. 3rd edn. (Orig. 1975). Homewood IL: Richard D. Irwin. Mitchell, R. (2010). BioArt and the Vitality of Media. Seattle WA: University of Washington Press. More, M. (2005). „The Proactionary Principle‟. http://www.maxmore.com/proactionary.htm Moss, L. (2003). What Genes Can’t Do. Cambridge MA: MIT. Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A., eds. (1993). The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Pinker, S. (2002). The Blank Slate. New York: Vintage. Pinker, S. (2008). „The stupidity of dignity‟. The New Republic. 28 May. Rasmussen, N. (2008). On Speed: The Many Lives of Amphetamines. New York: New York University Press. Rushkoff, D. (2010). Program or Be Programmed. New York: Avalon. Schelling T. (1968) „The life you save may be your own‟. In S. Chase (Ed.), Problems in Public Expenditure Analysis. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution. Schüklenk, U. and Pacholczyk, A. (2010). „Dignity‟s woolly uplift‟. Bioethics 24 (2): ii. Shenk, D. (2010). The Genius in All of Us. New York: Doubleday. Simonton, D. (1984), Genius, Creativity and Leadership. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Singer, P. (1993). Practical Ethics. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Singer, P. (1999). A Darwinian Left. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Smail, D. (2008). On Deep History and the Brain. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. Teilhard de Chardin, P. (1961). The Phenomenon of Man. (Orig. 1955). New York: Harper and Row. Turkle, S. (1984). Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. New York: Simon and Schuster. Wolbring, G. (2006) „Ableism and NBICS‟, http://www.innovationwatch.com/choiceisyours/choiceisyours.2006.08.15.htm , 15 August.|
Actions (login required)