Pitts, Matthew, Skrypchuk, Lee, Wellings, Tom, Attridge, Alex and Williams, M. A. (Mark A.). (2012) Evaluating user response to in-car haptic feedback touchscreens using the Lane Change Test. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2012 . p. 598739. ISSN 1687-5893

Preview

Text WRAP_Williams_user_responce_598739.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2435Kb) | Preview

Abstract

Touchscreen interfaces are widely used in modern technology, from mobile devices to in-car infotainment systems. However, touchscreens impose significant visual workload demands on the user which have safety implications for use in cars. Previous studies indicate that the application of haptic feedback can improve both performance of and affective response to user interfaces. This paper reports on and extends the findings of a 2009 study conducted to evaluate the effect of different combinations of touchscreen visual, audible and haptic feedback on driving and task performance, affective response and subjective workload, the initial findings of which were originally published in [8]. A total of 48 non-expert users completed the study. A dual-task approach was applied, using the Lane Change Test as the driving task and realistic automotive use case touchscreen tasks. Results indicated that while feedback type had no effect on driving or task performance, preference was expressed for multimodal feedback over visual alone. Issues with workload and cross-modal interaction were also identified.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	T Technology > TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering T Technology > TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > WMG (Formerly the Warwick Manufacturing Group)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Automobiles -- Technological innovations, Automotive computers, Touch screens, Distracted driving, User interfaces (Computer systems), Human-computer interaction
Journal or Publication Title:	Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Publisher:	Hindawi Publishing Corporation
ISSN:	1687-5893
Date:	5 April 2012
Volume:	2012
Number of Pages:	24
Page Range:	p. 598739
Identification Number:	10.1155/2012/598739
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	Advantage West Midlands (AWM), European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
References:	[1] A. Sears, C. Plaisant, and B. Shneiderman, “A new era for high precision touchscreens,” in Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, H. R. Hartson and D. Hix, Eds., pp. 2–3, Ablex Publishing, New Jersey, NJ, USA, 1992. [2] Gartner Incorporation, Gartner Says Touchscreen Mobile Device Sales Will Grow 97 Percent in 2010, March 2010, http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1313415. (Accessed 18th August 2011.) [3] DisplaySearch, Touch Screens in Tablet PCs Forecast to Reach 60M in 2011, March 2011, http://www.displaysearch .com/cps/rde/xchg/displaysearch/hs.xsl/110314 touch screens in tablet pcs forecast to reach 60m in 2011.asp. (Accessed 18th August 2011.) [4] M. J. Pitts, G. E. Burnett, L. Skrypchuk, T. Wellings, A. Attridge, and M. A. Williams, “Visual-haptic feedback interaction in automotive touchscreens,” Displays, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2012. [5] W. W. Wierwille, “Development of an initial model relating deiver in-vehicle visual demands to accident rate,” in Proceedings of the 3rd AnnualMid-Atlantic Human Factors Conference, pp. 1–7, Blacksburg, Va, USA, March 1995. [6] S. G. Klauer, T. A. Dingus, V. L. Neale, J. D. Sudweeks, and D. J. Ramsey, “The impact of driver inattention on nearcrash/ crash risk: an analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data,” Tech. Rep. DOT HS 810 594, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. [7] G. E. Burnett and J.M. Porter, “Ubiquitous computing within cars: designing controls for non-visual use,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 521– 531, 2001. [8] M. J. Pitts, M. A. Williams, T. Wellings, and A. Attridge, “Assessing subjective response to haptic feedback in automotive touchscreens,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI ’09), pp. 11–18, ACM, Essen, Germany, September 2009. [9] C. D. Wickens and J. G. Hollands, Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 3rd edition, 2000. [10] J. L. Burke, M. S. Prewett, A. A. Gray et al., “Comparing the effects of visual-auditory and visual-tactile feedback on user performance: a meta-analysis,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI ’06), pp. 108–117, Alberta, Canada, November 2006. [11] I. Poupyrev, S. Maruyama, and J. Rekimoto, “Ambient touch: designing tactile interfaces for handheld devices,” in Proceedings of the 15th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 51–60, Paris, France, October 2002. [12] E. Hoggan, S. A. Brewster, and J. Johnston, “Investigating the effectiveness of tactile feedback for mobile touchscreens,” in Proceedings of the 26th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’08), pp. 1573–1582, Florence, Italy, April 2008. [13] J.-H. Lee and C. Spence, “Assessing the benefits of multimodal feedback on dual-task performance under demanding conditions,” in Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction, vol. 1, pp. 185–192, British Computer Society, Liverpool, Uk, September 2008. [14] C. Serafin, R. Heers, M. Tschirhart, C. Ullrich, and C. Ramstien, “User experience in the US and Germany of invehicle touch-screens with integrated haptic and auditory feedback,” in Proceedings of the SAE World Congress, Detroit, Mich, USA, April 2007. [15] H. Richter, R. Ecker, C. Deisler, and A. Butz, “HapTouch and the 2+1 state model: potentials of haptic feedback on touch based in-vehicle information systems,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI ’10), pp. 72– 79, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, November 2010. [16] N. Bevan, “Usability is quality of use,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, A. Ogawa, Ed., Elsevier, Tokyo, Japan, July 1995. [17] A. P. O. S. Vermeeren, E. L. C. Law, V. Roto, M. Obrist, J. Hoonhout, and K. V¨a¨an¨anen-Vainio-Mattila, “User experience evaluation methods: current state and development needs,” in Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human- Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (NordiCHI ’10), pp. 521–530, Reykjavik, Iceland, October 2010. [18] G. Burnett, “Designing and evaluating in-car user-interfaces,” in Handbook of Research on User-Interface Design and Evaluation for Mobile Technology, J. Lumsden, Ed., pp. 218–236, IGI Global, Hershey, Penn, USA, 2008. [19] S. T. Godley, T. J. Triggs, and B. N. Fildes, “Driving simulator validation for speed research,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 589–600, 2002. [20] M. P. Reed and P. A. Green, “Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialling task,” Ergonomics, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1015– 1037, 1999. [21] T. W. Hoyes, N. A. Stanton, and R. G. Taylor, “Risk taking in simulated environments: evidence relevant to risk homeostasis theory,” in Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application, J. Rothengatter and E. Carbonell-Vaya, Eds., pp. 203–208, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997. [22] S. Mattes, “The lane-change-task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation,” in Quality ofWork and Products in Enterprises of the Future,H. Strasser et al., Ed., p. 57, Ergonomia, Stuttgart, Germany, 2003. [23] M. P. Bruyas, C. Brusque, H. Tattegrain, A. Auriault, I. Aillerie, andM. Duraz, “Consistency and sensitivity of lane change test according to driving simulator characteristics,” IET Intelligent Transport Systems, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 306–314, 2008. [24] ISO 26022:2010—Road vehicles—Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems—Simulated lane change test to assess in-vehicle secondary task demand. [25] J. Breuer, K. Bengler, C. Heinrich, and W. Reichelt, “Development of driver attention metrics (ADAM),” in Quality ofWork and Products in Enterprises of the Future, H. Strasser et al., Ed., pp. 37–40, Ergonomia, Stuttgart, Germany, 2003. [26] K. Young, M. G. Lenn´ea, and A. R. Williamsona, “Sensitivity of the lane change test as a measure of in-vehicle system demand,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 611–618, 2010. [27] J. L. Harbluk, J. S. Mitroi, and P. C. Burns, “Three navigation systems with three tasks: using the lane-change test (LCT) to assess distraction demand,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, pp. 24–30, Montana, Mont, USA, June 2009. [28] E. Mitsopoulos-Rubens, K. L. Young, and M. G. Lenn´e, Utility of the Lane Change Test in Exploring the Effects on Driving Performance of Engaging in Additional in Vehicle Tasks While Driving, Monash University Accident Research Centre, Victoria, Australia, 2010. [29] Institute of Ergonomics, Lane Change Test Screen Shot, Technische Universit¨at M¨unchen, 2012, http://www.lfe.mw.tum .de/ media/de/research/labs/lct.jpg. [30] H. Stone and J. L. Sidel, Sensory Evaluation Practices, Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2004. [31] D. V. Cicchetti, “Extension of multiple-range tests to interaction tables in the analysis of variance: a rapid approximate solution,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 405–408, 1972. [32] H. Abdi, “The bonferonni and ˇSid´ak corrections for multiple comparisons,” in Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, N. Salkind, Ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, Cailf, USA, 2007. [33] A. Rydstr¨om, C. Grane, and P. Bengtsson, “Driver behaviour during haptic and visual secondary tasks,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI ’09), pp. 121– 127, Essen, Germany, September 2009. [34] SAE J2364—Navigation and Route Guidance Function AccessibilityWhile Driving. [35] R. Leung, K. MacLean, M. B. Bertelsen, and M. Saubhasik, “Evaluation of haptically augmented touchscreen GUI elements under cognitive load,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI ’07), pp. 374–381, Nagoya, Japan, November 2007. [36] V. Occelli, C. Spence, and M. Zampini, “Audiotactile interactions in temporal perception,” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 429–454, 2011. [37] S. Soto-Faraco and G. Deco, “Multisensory contributions to the perception of vibrotactile events,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 196, no. 2, pp. 145–154, 2009. [38] C. Spence and M. Zampini, “Auditory contributions to multisensory product perception,” Acta Acustica united with Acustica, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1009–1025, 2006. [39] T. Petzoldt, N. B¨ar, C. Ihle, and J. F. Krems, “Learning effects in the lane change task (LCT)—evidence from two experimental studies,” Transportation Research F, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2011. [40] S. G. Hart and L. E. Staveland, “Development of NASATLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research,” in Human Mental Workload, P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, Eds., pp. 239–250, Elsevier Science Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1988. [41] D. A. Norman, Emotional Design : Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 2004. [42] T. Wellings, M. Williams, and C. Tennant, “Understanding customers’ holistic perception of switches in automotive human-machine interfaces,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 8–17, 2010. [43] T. Wellings, M. A. Williams, and M. Pitts, “Customer perception of switch-feel in luxury sports utility vehicles,” Food Quality and Preference, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 737–746, 2008. [44] T.Wellings, M. A.Williams, and C. Tennant, “Tactility, craftsmanship and the NPI process,” Tech. Rep., SAE Transactions Journal of Passenger Cars: Mechanical Systems, 2005.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/47795

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item