Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Should we primarily publish electronic guidelines as reminders?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Wyatt, Jeremy C. (2008) Should we primarily publish electronic guidelines as reminders? In: 5th International Guidelines International Network Conference, Helsinki, Finland, Oct 1-3, 2008

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://www.g-i-n.net/document-store/g-i-n-conferen...

Abstract

I believe that creating guidelines as word processed documents primarily for paper publication leads to a number of problems: • There is a risk of the document expanding into a lengthy evidence based textbook which takes years to write and is expensive to revise [Eccles 02] • The bulk makes it hard for users to find the specific page, paragraph and sentence that applies to this patient this visit. It also makes it hard for human authors to ensure that the guideline is complete and that words are used consistently • Any versions for different audiences (eg. patients, nurses, audit clerks) need to be written separately and kept by hand synchronised with the master version • The evidence shows that it is rare for such guideline documents themselves to change clinical practice or patient behavior [Grimshaw 04] • The material is designed to be read linearly, limiting our ability to extract text fragments to populate computer screens. To use the knowledge contained in the guideline for reminders or decision support, someone must spend weeks trying to locate and model small parts of the guideline as a knowledge base, only to find that it lacks detail or even disagrees with itself in places. I will argue that we should instead focus our evidence search and authoring process around proven clinical problems (ie. health decisions or actions with demonstrated and unexplained variation or deviation from evidence or patient preferences), rather than on a large number of questions spread out along the patient pathway. In addition, I believe we should publish guidelines primarily as a set of well structured computer reminders and alerts, with a secondary hypertext version reserved for browsing on screen.

Item Type: Conference Item (Keynote)
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources > ZA Information resources
Divisions: Faculty of Science > WMG (Formerly the Warwick Manufacturing Group)
Date: 2 October 2008
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Conference Paper Type: Keynote
Title of Event: 5th International Guidelines International Network Conference
Type of Event: Conference
Location of Event: Helsinki, Finland
Date(s) of Event: Oct 1-3, 2008
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/47841

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us