Vesper, Cordula, Butterfill, Stephen A. (Stephen Andrew), Knoblich, Günther and Sebanz, Natalie. (2010) A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, Vol.23 (No.8-9). pp. 998-1003. ISSN 0893-6080

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

What kinds of processes and representations make joint action possible? In this paper, we suggest a minimal architecture for joint action that focuses on representations, action monitoring and action prediction processes, as well as ways of simplifying coordination. The architecture spells out minimal requirements for an individual agent to engage in a joint action. We discuss existing evidence in support of the architecture as well as open questions that remain to be empirically addressed. In addition, we suggest possible interfaces between the minimal architecture and other approaches to joint action. The minimal architecture has implications for theorising about the emergence of joint action, for human-machine interaction, and for understanding how coordination can be facilitated by exploiting relations between multiple agents' actions and between actions and the environment. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Philosophy
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Cognition, Communication in organizations, Decision making, Human behavior, Agent (Philosophy), Act (Philosophy), Prediction (Psychology), Human-machine systems
Journal or Publication Title:	Neural Networks
Publisher:	Pergamon
ISSN:	0893-6080
Date:	October 2010
Volume:	Vol.23
Number:	No.8-9
Number of Pages:	6
Page Range:	pp. 998-1003
Identification Number:	10.1016/j.neunet.2010.06.002
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
References:	Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M, & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11(9), 1109–1116. Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N., Prinz, W., & Knoblich, G. (2008). Action co-representation: the joint SNARC effect. Social Neuroscience, 3(3–4), 410–420. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624–652. Bratman, M. E. (1993). Shared intention. Ethics, 104, 97–113. Bratman, M. E. (1997). I Intend that we J. In R. Tuomela, & G. Holmstrom- Hintikka (Eds.), Contemporary action theory, volume 2: social action (pp. 49–63). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Bratman, M. E. (2009). Modest sociality and the distinctiveness of intention. Philosophical Studies, 114(1), 149–165. Brennan, S. E., Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A., Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). Coordinating cognition: the costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognition, 106, 1465–1477. Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: an fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1243–1249. Carpenter, M. (2009). Just how joint is joint action in infancy? Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 380–392. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., Franks, N. R., & Levin, S. A. (2005). Effective leadership and decision making in animal groups on the move. Nature, 433, 513–516. de Bruijn, E. R. A., de Lange, F. P., von Cramon, D. Y., & Ullsperger, M. (2009). When errors are rewarding. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(39), 12183–12186. Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Christ, S., & Hohnsbein, J. (2000). ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial. Biological Psychology, 51, 87–107. Flach, R., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2004). Recognizing one’s own clapping: the role of temporal cues. Psychological Research, 69, 147–156. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw, & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Gilbert, M. (1992). On social facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Goebl, W., & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. Music Perception, 26(5), 427–438. Graf, M., Reitzner, B., Corves, C., Casile, A., Giese, M., & Prinz, W. (2007). Predicting point-light actions in real-time. Neuroimage, 36, T22–T32. Gräfenhain, M., Behne, T., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Young children’s understanding of joint commitments. Developmental Psychology, 45(5), 1430–1443. Keller, P. E. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In F. Morganti, A. Carassa, & G. Riva (Eds.), Enacting intersubjectivity: a cognitive and social perspective on the study of interactions (pp. 205–221). Amsterdam: IOS Press. Keller, P. E., Knoblich, G., & Repp, B. H. (2007). Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: on the possible role of action simulation in synchronization. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 102–111. Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science, 12(6), 467–472. Knoblich, G., & Jordan, J. S. (2003). Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 1006–1016. Malfait, N., Valyear, K. F., Culham, J. C., Anton, J.-L., Brown, L. E., & Gribble, P. L. (2009). FMRI activation during observation of others’ reach errors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(7), 1493–1503. Marsh, K. L., Johnston, L., Richardson, M. J.,&Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Toward a radically embodied, embedded social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1217–1225. Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science, 311, 1297–1300. Moll, H., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Cooperation and human cognition: the Vygotskian intelligence hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 362, 639–648. Newman-Norlund, R. D., Ganesh, S., van Schie, H. T., Bruijn, E. R. A. D., & Bekkering, H. (2009). Self-identification and empathy modulate error-related brain activity during the observation of penalty shots between friend and foe. Scan, 4, 10–22. Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1966). Errors and error correction in choice–response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(2), 264–272. Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2008). The sources of normativity: young children’s awareness of the normative structure of games. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 875–881. Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., & Baron, R. M. (2007). Judging and actualizing intrapersonal and interpersonal affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 845–859. Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R. W., Goodman, J. R., & Schmidt, R. (2007). Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science, 26, 867–891. Schmidt, R. C., & Richardson, M. J. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In A. Fuchs, & V. K. Jirsa (Eds.), Coordination: neural, behavioral and social dynamics (pp. 281–308). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Schuch, S., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). On observing another person’s actions: influences of observed inhibition and errors. Perception and Psychophysics, 69(5), 828–837. Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 353–367. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: just like one’s own? Cognition, 88, B11–B21. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task: corepresenting stimulus–response mappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1234–1246. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., & Wascher, E. (2006). Twin peaks: an ERP study of action planning and control in coacting individuals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(5), 859–870. Shockley, K., Baker, A. A., Richardson, M. J., & Fowler, C. A. (2007). Articulatory constraints on interpersonal postural coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(1), 201–208. Tollefsen, D. (2005). Let’s pretend! children and joint action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 35(1), 75–97. Tsai, C.-C., Kuo, W.-J., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2008). Action co-representation is tuned to other humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(11), 2015–2024. Tsai, C.-C., Kuo, W.-J., Jing, J.-T., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J.-L. (2006). A common coding framework in self-other interaction: evidence from joint action task. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 353–362. Tuomela, R. (2005). WE-intentions revisited. Philosophical Studies, 125, 327–369. van Elk, M., van Schie, H., Hunnius, S., Vesper, C., & Bekkering, H. (2008). You’ll never crawl alone: neurophysiological evidence for experience-dependent motor resonance in infancy. Neuroimage, 43, 808–814. van Schie, H. T., Mars, R. B., Coles, M. G. H., & Bekkering, H. (2004). Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 549–554. Vesper, C., van der Wel, R.P.R.D., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. Better be fast: speeding supports coordination of intermittent joint actions (submitted for publication). Vesper, C., Soutschek, A., & Schubö, A. (2009). Motion coordination affects movement parameters in a joint pick-and-place task. Quartely Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(12), 2418–2432. Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 460–473. Wilson, M., & Wilson, T. P. (2005). An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 12(6), 957–968. Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 358, 593–602. Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1212–1217. Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998). Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(9), 338–347.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/4785

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item