The Library
Effectiveness of a social support intervention on infant feeding practices : randomised controlled trial
Tools
Watt, R. G., Tull, K. I., Hardy, R., Wiggins, M., Kelly, Yvonne, Molloy, B, and Dowler, Elizabeth, 1951-. (2009) Effectiveness of a social support intervention on infant feeding practices : randomised controlled trial. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, Vol.63 (No.2). pp. 156-162. ISSN 0143-005X
|
PDF
WRAP_Dowler_Effectiveness_BMJ.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (314Kb) |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2008.077115
Abstract
Background: To assess whether monthly home visits from trained volunteers could improve infant feeding practices at age 12 months, a randomised controlled trial was carried out in two disadvantaged inner city London boroughs. Methods: Women attending baby clinics with their infants (312) were randomised to receive monthly home visits from trained volunteers over a 9-month period (intervention group) or standard professional care only (control group). The primary outcome was vitamin C intakes from fruit. Secondary outcomes included selected macro and micro-nutrients, infant feeding habits, supine length and weight. Data were collected at baseline when infants were aged approximately 10 weeks, and subsequently when the child was 12 and 18 months old. Results: Two-hundred and twelve women (68%) completed the trial. At both follow-up points no significant differences were found between the groups for vitamin C intakes from fruit or other nutrients. At first follow-up, however, infants in the intervention group were significantly less likely to be given goats’ or soya milks, and were more likely to have three solid meals per day. At the second follow-up, intervention group children were significantly less likely to be still using a bottle. At both follow-up points, intervention group children also consumed significantly more specific fruit and vegetables. Conclusions: Home visits from trained volunteers had no significant effect on nutrient intakes but did promote some other recommended infant feeding practices.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RJ Pediatrics > RJ101 Child Health. Child health services |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology |
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Infant health services -- Research, Home health aids, Infants -- Nutrition |
| Journal or Publication Title: | Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health |
| Publisher: | BMJ Group |
| ISSN: | 0143-005X |
| Date: | 2009 |
| Volume: | Vol.63 |
| Number: | No.2 |
| Page Range: | pp. 156-162 |
| Identification Number: | 10.1136/jech.2008.077115 |
| Status: | Peer Reviewed |
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access |
| Funder: | Great Britain. Food Standards Agency (FSA) |
| Grant number: | N09016 (FSA) |
| References: | 1. World Health Organization. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Report of a joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003. 2. Fall CHD, Barker DJP, Osmond C, et al. Relation of infant feeding to adult serum cholesterol concentration and death from ischaemic heart disease. Br Med J 1992;304:801–05. 3. Department of Health. Weaning and the weaning diet. Report on Health and Social Subjects. Report of the Working Group on the weaning diet of the committee on medical aspects of food policy. London: HMSO, 1994. 4. Department of Health. Infant feeding recommendations. London: Department of Health, 2003. 5. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Maternal and Child Nutrition. Public health guidance 11. London: NICE, 2008. 6. Bolling K, Grant C, Hamlyn B, et al. Infant feeding survey 2005. London: Information Centre, 2007. 7. Kelly Y, Watt RG. Breastfeeding initiation and exclusive duration at 6 months by social class – results from the Millennium Cohort Study. Public Health Nutr 2005;8:417–421. 8. Dyson L, McCormick F, Renfrew MJ. Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding. (Cochrane Review). In the Cochrane Library (Issue 4). Oxford: Update Software, 2005. 9. Sikorski J, Renfrew MJ, Pindoria S, et al. Support for breastfeeding mothers. (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library (Issue 2). Oxford: Update Software, 2004. 10. Tedstone A, Dunce N, Aviles M, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to promote healthy feeding in infants under one year of age: a review. London: Health Education Authority, 1998. 11. McEnery G, Rao K. The effectiveness of antenatal education of Pakistani and Indian women living in this country. Child Care Health Dev 1986;12:385–399. 12. Frank D, Wirtz SJ, Sorenson JR, et al. Commercial discharge packs and breast feeding counselling: effects on infant feeding practices in a randomized trial. Paediatrics 1987;80:845–854. 13. Lapinleimu H, Viikari J, Jokinen E, et al. Prospective randomized trial in 1062 infants of diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol. Lancet 1995;345:471–476. 14. Griffiths B, et al. Health education and iron intakes of weaning children. Health Visit 1995;68:418–419. 15. Childs F, Aukett A, Darbyshire P, et al. Dietary education and iron deficiency anaemia in the inner city. Arch Dis Child 1997;76:1447. 16. Hoare K, Wright CM, Wilson P, et al. Disseminating weaning messages: an intervention trial. Br J Community Nurs 2002;7:196–200. 17. Johnson Z, Howell F, Molloy B. Community mothers programme: randomised controlled trial of a non-professional intervention in parenting. Br Med J 1993;306:1449–1452. 18. Johnson Z, Molloy B, Scallan E, et al. Community mothers programme – seven year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial of non-professional intervention in parenting. J Public Health Med 2000;22:337–342. 19. Noble M, et al. English Indices of Deprivation, revised, 2004. Report to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. London: Neighbourhood Renewal Unit, 2004. 20. Department of Education and Employment. Sure Start: Making a difference for children and families. London: Department of Education and Employment, 1999. 21. Cohen S, McKay G. Social support, stress and the buffering hypothesis, a theoretical analysis. In: Baum A, Singer J, Taylor S, eds. Handbook of Psychology and Health. Hillside NJ: Laurence Erlbaum, 1984:253–67. 22. Watt RG, McGlone P, Russell J, et al. The process of establishing, implementing and maintaining a social support infant feeding programme. Public Health Nutr 2006;9:714–721. 23. Gregory JR, Collins DL, Davies PS, et al. National diet and nutrition survey: children aged 1.5 to 4.5 years. Vol 1. Report of the diet and nutrition survey. London: HMSO, 1995. 24. Kirkwood BR, Sterne JA. Essential Medical Statistics (second edition). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003. 25. Nelson M, Dick K, Holmes B, et al. Low Income Diet Methods Study. London: Food Standards Agency, 2002. 26. Nelson M, Erens B, Bates B, et al. Low Income Diet and Nutrition Survey. Volume 1. Background, methods and sample characteristics. London: TSO, 2007. 27. Department of Health. Five a day pilot initiatives. Executive summary of pilot evaluation. London: Department of Health, 2002. 28. Del Tredici A, Joy A, Omelich C, et al. Evaluation study of the California Expanded Food & Nutrition Program. J Am Diet Assoc 1989;89:1656. 29. Buller DB, Morrill C, Taren D, et al. Randomized trial testing the effect of peer education at increasing fruit and vegetable intake. J Nat Cancer Inst 1999;91:1491– 1500. 30. Gerrish C, Mennella J. Flavor variety enhances food acceptance in formula fed infants. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;73:1080–5. 31. Birch L, McPhee L, Shoba B. What kind of exposure reduces children’s food neophobia? Looking vs. tasting. Appetite 1987;9:171–8. 32. Savage SAH, Reilly JJ, Durnin JVGA, et al. Weaning practice in the Glasgow Longitudinal Infant Growth Survey. Arch Dis Child 1998;79:153–156. 33. Anderson AS, Guthrie CA, Alder EA, et al. Rattling the plate – reasons and rationales for early weaning. Health Educ Res 2001;16:471–479. 34. Watt RG, Dowler E, Hardy R, et al. Promoting recommended infant feeding practices in a low-income sample – randomised controlled trial of a peer support intervention. London: Food Standards Agency, 2006. |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/483 |
Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Tools
Tools

