The Library

Effectiveness of a social support intervention on infant feeding practices : randomised controlled trial

Tools

Watt, R. G., Tull, K. I., Hardy, R., Wiggins, M., Kelly, Yvonne, Molloy, B, and Dowler, Elizabeth. (2009) Effectiveness of a social support intervention on infant feeding practices : randomised controlled trial. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, Vol.63 (No.2). pp. 156-162. ISSN 0143-005X

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Dowler_Effectiveness_BMJ.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (314Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2008.077115

Abstract

Background: To assess whether monthly home visits from trained volunteers could improve infant feeding practices at age 12 months, a randomised controlled trial was carried out in two disadvantaged inner city London boroughs.

Methods: Women attending baby clinics with their infants (312) were randomised to receive monthly home visits from trained volunteers over a 9-month period (intervention group) or standard professional care only (control group). The primary outcome was vitamin C intakes from fruit. Secondary outcomes included selected macro and micro-nutrients, infant feeding habits, supine length and weight. Data were collected at baseline when infants were aged approximately 10 weeks, and subsequently when the child was 12 and 18 months old.

Results: Two-hundred and twelve women (68%) completed the trial. At both follow-up points no significant differences were found between the groups for vitamin C intakes from fruit or other nutrients. At first follow-up, however, infants in the intervention group were significantly less likely to be given goats’ or soya milks, and were more likely to have three solid meals per day. At the second follow-up, intervention group children were significantly less likely to be still using a bottle. At both follow-up points, intervention group children also consumed significantly more specific fruit and vegetables.

Conclusions: Home visits from trained volunteers had no significant effect on nutrient intakes but did promote some other recommended infant feeding practices.

Item Type:

Journal Article

Subjects:

R Medicine > RJ Pediatrics > RJ101 Child Health. Child health services

Divisions:

Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

Infant health services -- Research, Home health aids, Infants -- Nutrition

Journal or Publication Title:

Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health

Publisher:

BMJ Group

ISSN:

0143-005X

Official Date:

2009

Dates:

Date	Event
2009	Published

Volume:

Vol.63

Number:

No.2

Page Range:

pp. 156-162

Identification Number:

10.1136/jech.2008.077115

Status:

Peer Reviewed

Access rights to Published version:

Open Access

Funder:

Great Britain. Food Standards Agency (FSA)

Grant number:

N09016 (FSA)

References:

1. World Health Organization. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases.
Report of a joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization,
2003.
2. Fall CHD, Barker DJP, Osmond C, et al. Relation of infant feeding to adult serum
cholesterol concentration and death from ischaemic heart disease. Br Med J
1992;304:801–05.
3. Department of Health. Weaning and the weaning diet. Report on Health and Social
Subjects. Report of the Working Group on the weaning diet of the committee on
medical aspects of food policy. London: HMSO, 1994.
4. Department of Health. Infant feeding recommendations. London: Department of
Health, 2003.
5. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Maternal and
Child Nutrition. Public health guidance 11. London: NICE, 2008.
6. Bolling K, Grant C, Hamlyn B, et al. Infant feeding survey 2005. London: Information
Centre, 2007.
7. Kelly Y, Watt RG. Breastfeeding initiation and exclusive duration at 6 months by
social class – results from the Millennium Cohort Study. Public Health Nutr
2005;8:417–421.
8. Dyson L, McCormick F, Renfrew MJ. Interventions for promoting the initiation of
breastfeeding. (Cochrane Review). In the Cochrane Library (Issue 4). Oxford: Update
Software, 2005.
9. Sikorski J, Renfrew MJ, Pindoria S, et al. Support for breastfeeding mothers.
(Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library (Issue 2). Oxford: Update Software,
2004.
10. Tedstone A, Dunce N, Aviles M, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to promote
healthy feeding in infants under one year of age: a review. London: Health Education
Authority, 1998.
11. McEnery G, Rao K. The effectiveness of antenatal education of Pakistani and Indian
women living in this country. Child Care Health Dev 1986;12:385–399.
12. Frank D, Wirtz SJ, Sorenson JR, et al. Commercial discharge packs and breast
feeding counselling: effects on infant feeding practices in a randomized trial.
Paediatrics 1987;80:845–854.
13. Lapinleimu H, Viikari J, Jokinen E, et al. Prospective randomized trial in 1062 infants
of diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol. Lancet 1995;345:471–476.
14. Griffiths B, et al. Health education and iron intakes of weaning children. Health Visit
1995;68:418–419.
15. Childs F, Aukett A, Darbyshire P, et al. Dietary education and iron deficiency anaemia
in the inner city. Arch Dis Child 1997;76:1447.
16. Hoare K, Wright CM, Wilson P, et al. Disseminating weaning messages: an
intervention trial. Br J Community Nurs 2002;7:196–200.
17. Johnson Z, Howell F, Molloy B. Community mothers programme: randomised
controlled trial of a non-professional intervention in parenting. Br Med J
1993;306:1449–1452.
18. Johnson Z, Molloy B, Scallan E, et al. Community mothers programme – seven year
follow-up of a randomised controlled trial of non-professional intervention in
parenting. J Public Health Med 2000;22:337–342.
19. Noble M, et al. English Indices of Deprivation, revised, 2004. Report to the Office of
the Deputy Prime Minister. London: Neighbourhood Renewal Unit, 2004.
20. Department of Education and Employment. Sure Start: Making a difference for
children and families. London: Department of Education and Employment, 1999.
21. Cohen S, McKay G. Social support, stress and the buffering hypothesis, a theoretical
analysis. In: Baum A, Singer J, Taylor S, eds. Handbook of Psychology and Health.
Hillside NJ: Laurence Erlbaum, 1984:253–67.
22. Watt RG, McGlone P, Russell J, et al. The process of establishing, implementing and
maintaining a social support infant feeding programme. Public Health Nutr
2006;9:714–721.
23. Gregory JR, Collins DL, Davies PS, et al. National diet and nutrition survey: children
aged 1.5 to 4.5 years. Vol 1. Report of the diet and nutrition survey. London: HMSO,
1995.
24. Kirkwood BR, Sterne JA. Essential Medical Statistics (second edition). Oxford:
Blackwell Publishing, 2003.
25. Nelson M, Dick K, Holmes B, et al. Low Income Diet Methods Study. London: Food
Standards Agency, 2002.
26. Nelson M, Erens B, Bates B, et al. Low Income Diet and Nutrition Survey. Volume 1.
Background, methods and sample characteristics. London: TSO, 2007.
27. Department of Health. Five a day pilot initiatives. Executive summary of pilot
evaluation. London: Department of Health, 2002.
28. Del Tredici A, Joy A, Omelich C, et al. Evaluation study of the California Expanded
Food & Nutrition Program. J Am Diet Assoc 1989;89:1656.
29. Buller DB, Morrill C, Taren D, et al. Randomized trial testing the effect of peer
education at increasing fruit and vegetable intake. J Nat Cancer Inst 1999;91:1491–
1500.
30. Gerrish C, Mennella J. Flavor variety enhances food acceptance in formula fed
infants. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;73:1080–5.
31. Birch L, McPhee L, Shoba B. What kind of exposure reduces children’s food
neophobia? Looking vs. tasting. Appetite 1987;9:171–8.
32. Savage SAH, Reilly JJ, Durnin JVGA, et al. Weaning practice in the Glasgow
Longitudinal Infant Growth Survey. Arch Dis Child 1998;79:153–156.
33. Anderson AS, Guthrie CA, Alder EA, et al. Rattling the plate – reasons and rationales
for early weaning. Health Educ Res 2001;16:471–479.
34. Watt RG, Dowler E, Hardy R, et al. Promoting recommended infant feeding practices
in a low-income sample – randomised controlled trial of a peer support intervention.
London: Food Standards Agency, 2006.