Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Providing audible feedback in (workplace) interaction - are there ethnic differences?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Marra, Meredith and Holmes, J. (2009) Providing audible feedback in (workplace) interaction - are there ethnic differences? In: 11th Conference of the International Pragmatics Association, Melbourne, Australia, Jul 12-17, 2009. Published in: Abstracts of the 11th Conference of the International Pragmatics Association p. 118.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://ipra.ua.ac.be/main.aspx?c=.CONFERENCE11&n=1...

Abstract

In many western communities it is assumed that appropriate listener activities entail active and audible feedback carefully positioned at “transition-relevance places” (McCarthy 2003, Sacks et al, 1974, Schegloff 1982) in order to indicate interest and involvement in the interaction. Data collected in New Zealand Māori and Pākehā (people of European origin) workplaces could be regarded as challenging this assumption. Firstly in Māori meetings audible feedback is quite acceptable within a speaker turn. It is not interpreted as an interruption or as an indication of inattention or rudeness. Moreover, its positioning appears to be subtly different than in Pākehā interaction. Secondly, in Māori conversation there is greater tolerance for silence (Metge and Kinloch 1978), and, moreover, pauses between turns are considerably longer than in interactions between Pākehā conversationalists. This paper compares interactions in Māori and Pākehā workplaces in order to explore the hypothesis that what are considered appropriate listener activities are strongly influenced by cultural norms. Potential areas of confusion and misunderstanding will also be identified.

Item Type: Conference Item (Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Applied Linguistics
Journal or Publication Title: Abstracts of the 11th Conference of the International Pragmatics Association
Publisher: International Pragmatics Association
Date: July 2009
Page Range: p. 118
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Conference Paper Type: Paper
Title of Event: 11th Conference of the International Pragmatics Association
Type of Event: Conference
Location of Event: Melbourne, Australia
Date(s) of Event: Jul 12-17, 2009
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/48486

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us