Seers, Kate, Cox, Karen, Crichton, Nicola J., Edwards, Rhiannon, Eldh, Ann, Estabrooks, Carole A., Harvey, Gill , Hawkes, Claire, Kitson, Alison L., Linck, P., McCarthy, Geraldine, 1950-, McCormack, Brendan, Mockford, Carole, Rycroft-Malone, Jo, Titchen, Angie and Wallin, Lars. (2012) FIRE (facilitating implementation of research evidence) : a study protocol. Implementation Science, Vol.7 (No.1). p. 25. ISSN 1748-5908

Preview

Text WRAP_Seers_1748-5908-7-25.pdf - Published Version Download (394Kb) | Preview

Abstract

Research evidence underpins best practice, but is not always used in healthcare. The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework suggests that the nature of evidence, the context in which it is used, and whether those trying to use evidence are helped (or facilitated) affect the use of evidence. Urinary incontinence has a major effect on quality of life of older people, has a high prevalence, and is a key priority within European health and social care policy. Improving continence care has the potential to improve the quality of life for older people and reduce the costs associated with providing incontinence aids.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	R Medicine > R Medicine (General) R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Health and Social Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Evidence-based medicine, Medical care -- Research, Urinary incontinence in old age -- Treatment
Journal or Publication Title:	Implementation Science
Publisher:	BioMed Central Ltd.
ISSN:	1748-5908
Date:	2012
Volume:	Vol.7
Number:	No.1
Page Range:	p. 25
Identification Number:	10.1186/1748-5908-7-25
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	Seventh Framework Programme (European Commission) (FP7/2007-2013)
Grant number:	223646 (FP7)
References:	1. Schuster M, McGlynn E, Brook RH: How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q 1998, 76:517-563. 2. Grol R: Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Medical Care 2001, 39:1146-1154. 3. Rawlins M: In pursuit of quality: the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Lancet 1999, 353:1079-1082. 4. Lewis D: National guideline clearing house: extensive resource underused. Manag Care 2001, 10:41-42. 5. Ibbotsen T, Grimshaw J, Grant A: Evaluation of a programme of workshops for the teaching of critical appraisal skills. Medical Education 1998, 32:486-491. 6. Cox K, Titchen A: Doen en weten dichter bij elkaar brengen voor evidence-based practice. Verpleegkunde 2003, 18:232-241. 7. Agency for Health Research and Quality: Translating research into practice II (TRIP II) Washington DC: AHRQ; 2001. 8. Hanney S, Soper B, Buxton M: Evaluation of the NHS R&D Implementation Methods Programme London: Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University; 2003. 9. Sheldon TA, Cullum N, Dawson D, Lankshear A, Lowson K, Watt I, et al: What’s the evidence that NICE guidance has been implemented? Results from a national evaluation using time series analysis, audit of patients’ notes, and interviews. Br Med J 2007, 329:999. 10. Hulscher M, van Drenth B, van der Wouden J, Mokkink H, van Weel C, Grol R: Changing preventive practice: a controlled trial on the effects of outreach visits to organise prevention of cardiovascular disease. Qual Health Care 1997, 6:19-24. 11. Weijden Van der T, Grol R, Knottnerus J: Feasibility of a national cholesterol guideline in daily practice. A randomized controlled trial in 20 general practices. Int J Qual Health Care 1999, 11:131-137. 12. Tsai S: The effects of a research utilization in-service program on nurses. Int J Nurs Stud 2003, 40:105-113. 13. Majumdar S, Finlay M, Furberg C: From knowledge to practice in chronic cardiovascular disease: a long and winding road. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43:1738-1742. 14. Holroyd-Leduc JM, Abelseth GA, Khandwala F, Silvius JL, Hogan DB, Schmaltz HN, Frank CB, Straus SE: A pragmatic study exploring the prevention of delirium among hospitalized older hip fracture patients: applying evidence to routine clinical practice using clinical decision support. Implement Sci 2010, 5:81. 15. Dopson S, Fitzgerald L: From Knowledge to Action? Oxford University Press: Evidence Based Medicine in Context; 2005. 16. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O: Diffussion of innovation in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 2004, 82:581-629. 17. Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B: Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Qual Health Care 1998, 7:149-159. 18. Rycroft-Malone J, Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A, Estabrooks C: Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework. Qual Safety Health Care 2002, 11:174-180. 19. Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, Seers K, Kitson A, McCormack B, Titchen A: An exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence into practice. J Clin Nurs 2004, 13:913-924. 20. Models and Frameworks for Implementing Evidence-Based Practice: Linking Evidence to Action. Edited by: Rycroft-Malone J, Bucknall T. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford; 2010:. 21. Kitson A, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A: Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARIHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges (2008). Implement Sci 2008, 3:1[http://www.implementationscience.com/content/ pdf/1748-5908-3-1.pdf], Accessed 31/08/2011. 22. Rycroft-Malone J, Seers K, Titchen A, Harvey G, Kitson A, McCormack B: What counts as evidence in evidence-based practice? J Adv Nurs 2004, 47:81-90. 23. McCormack B, Kitson A, Harvey G, Rycroft-Malone J, Titchen A, Seers K: Getting evidence into practice: the meaning of context. J Adv Nurs 2002, 38:94-104. 24. Harvey G, Loftus-Hills A, Rycroft-Malone J, Titchen A, Kitson A, McCormack B, Seers K: Getting evidence into practice: the role and function of facilitation. J Adv Nurs 2002, 37:577-588. 25. Brown D, McCormack B: Developing post-operative pain management: utilising the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2005, 2:131-141. 26. Wallin L, Ewald U, Wikblad K, Scott-Findlay S, Arnetz B: Understanding work contextual factors: A short-cut to evidence-based practice? Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2006, 3:153-164. 27. Doran DM, Sidani S: Outcomes-focussed knowledge translation: A framework for Knowledge translation and patient outcomes improvement. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2007, 4:3-13. 28. Bahtsevani C, Wilman A: Developing an instrument for evaluating implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a test-retest study. J Eval Clin Pract 2008, 14:839-846. 29. Estabrooks CA, Squires J, Cummings GG, Birdsell J, Norton PG: Development and assessment of the Alberta Context Tool. BMC Health Serv Res 2009, 9:234. 30. Helfrich CD, Damschroder LJ, Hagedorn HJ, Daggett GS, Sahay A, Ritchie M, Damush T, Guihan M, Ullrich PM, Stetler CB: A critical synthesis of literature on the promoting action on research implementation in health services (PARIHS) framework. Implement Sci 2010, 5:82. 31. Rhydderch M, Edwards A, Marshall M, Elwyn G, Grol R: Developing a facilitation model to promote organizational development in primary care practices. BMC Fam Pract 2006, 7:38, doi:10.1186/1471-2296-7-38. Downloaded 31/08/2011. 32. Thor J, Wittlov K, Herrlin B, Brommels M, Svensson O, Skar J, Ovretveit J: Learning helpers: how they facilitated improvement and improved facilitation - Lessons from a hospital-wide quality improvement initiative. Qual Manag Health Care 2004, 13:60-74. 33. Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, Shaw EJ, Cheater F, Flottorp S, Robertson N: Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, , 3: CD005470, DOI 10.1002/ 14651858. CD005470.pub2. 34. Squires JE, Moralejo D, LeFort SM: (2007) Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses. Implement Sci 2007, 2:17, doi:10.1.1186/1748-5908-2- 17. [http://www.implementationscience.com/content/pdf/1748-5908-2-17. pdf Accessed 31/08/2011]. 35. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MAcLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, et al: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment 2004, 8(6). 36. Thompson DS, Estabrooks CA, Scott-Findlay S, Moore K, Wallin L: (2007) Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2007, 2:15[http://www.implementationscience.com/ content/pdf/1748-5908-2-15.pdf], Accessed 31/8/2011. 37. Medves J, Godfrey C, Turner C, Paterson M, Harrison M, MacKenzie L, Durando P: Systematic review of practice guidelines dissemination and implementation stratgeis for healthcare teams and team-based practice. Internal J Evidence Based Healthcare 2010, 8:78-89. 38. Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Foy R: Disseminating and implementing evidencebased practice. In Clinical Governance in Primary Care. Edited by: Van Zwanenberg T, Harrison J. Oxford, UK:Radcliffe Medical Press Ltd; 2004:75-87. 39. Grol R, Bosch M, Hulscher M, Eccles M, Wensing M: Planning and studying improvement in patient care: The use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q 2007, 85:93-138. 40. Pawson R, Tilley N: Realistic evaluation Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997. 41. Wiechula R, Kitson A, Marcoionni D, Page T, Zeitz K, Silverston H: Improving the Fundamentals of Care for Older People in the Acute Hospital Setting: Facilitating practice improvement using a Knowledge Translation (KT) Tool kit. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2009, 7:283-295. 42. Hardy S, Titchen A, Manley K: Patient narratives in the investigation and development of nursing practice expertise: a potential for transformation. Nursing Inquiry 2007, 14:80-88. 43. DuBeau CE, Kuchel GA, Johnson T, Palmer MH, Wagg A: Committee 11. Incontience in the frail elderly. In Incontinence. 4th International Consultation on Incontinence. Health Publications Limited Edited by: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A 2009, 961-1024, and1796-1789 [http://www. icsoffice.org/Publications/ICI_4/book.pdf Accessed 31/08/11]. 44. Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Levels of Evidence. [http:// www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025], Accessed 31/08/2011. 45. Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Bavendam TG, Martin ML, Buesching DP: Quality of life in persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure. Urology 1996, 47:67-72. 46. Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM, Yalcin I, Wagner TH, Buesching DP: Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: further development of the incontinence quality of life instrument (I-QOL). Urology 1999, 53:71-76. 47. EuroQoL: A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol group. Health Policy 1990, 16:199-208. 48. Kunz S: Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D in a study of people with mild to moderate dementia. Qual Life Res 2010, 19:425-434. 49. Rycroft-Malone J, Fontenla M, Bick D, Seers K: A realistic evaluation: the case of protocol-based care. Implement Sci 2010, 5:38. 50. Spradley JP: Participant Observation Fort Worth, USA: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc; 1980. 51. McCormack B, McCarthy G, Wright J, Slater P, Coffey A: (2009) Development and testing of the context assessment index. Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing 2009, 6:27-35. 52. Glick HA, Doshi JA, Sonnad SS, Polsky D: Economic Evaluation in Clinical Trials (Handbooks for Health Economic Evaluation). 1 edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. 53. Edwards RT, Hounsome B, Linck P, Russell IT: Economic evaluation alongside pragmatic randomised trials: developing a Standard Operating Procedure for clinical trials units. Trials 2008, 14:64-65. 54. Vale L, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Grimshaw J: (2007) Systematic review of economic evaluations and cost analyses of guideline implementation strategies. Eur J Health Econ 2007, 8:111-121. 55. EuroQoL Group, Executive Office: EQ-5D -3 L User Guide. Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-3L instrument. Version 4 2011 [http://www.euroqol. org/fileadmin/user_upload/Documenten/PDF/Folders_Flyers/UserGuide_EQ- 5D-3L.pdf], Accessed 31/08/2011. 56. Donner A, Klar N: Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research London: Arnold; 2000. 57. Sandelowski M: Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-methods studies. Res Nurs Health 2000, 23:246-255.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/48735

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item