Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Modelling the spread of Wolbachia in spatially heterogeneous environments

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Hancock, Penelope A. and Godfray, H. Charles J.. (2012) Modelling the spread of Wolbachia in spatially heterogeneous environments. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, Vol.9 (No.76). pp. 3045-3054. ISSN 1742-5689

[img]
Preview
Text
WRAP_Hancock_Wolbachia_rsif.2012.0253.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (885Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/​rsif.2012.0253

Abstract

The endosymbiont Wolbachia infects a large number of insect species and is capable of rapid spread when introduced into a novel host population. The bacteria spread by manipulating their hosts' reproduction, and their dynamics are influenced by the demographic structure of the host population and patterns of contact between individuals. Reaction–diffusion models of the spatial spread of Wolbachia provide a simple analytical description of their spatial dynamics but do not account for significant details of host population dynamics. We develop a metapopulation model describing the spatial dynamics of Wolbachia in an age-structured host insect population regulated by juvenile density-dependent competition. The model produces similar dynamics to the reaction–diffusion model in the limiting case where the host's habitat quality is spatially homogeneous and Wolbachia has a small effect on host fitness. When habitat quality varies spatially, Wolbachia spread is usually much slower, and the conditions necessary for local invasion are strongly affected by immigration of insects from surrounding regions. Spread is most difficult when variation in habitat quality is spatially correlated. The results show that spatial variation in the density-dependent competition experienced by juvenile host insects can strongly affect the spread of Wolbachia infections, which is important to the use of Wolbachia to control insect vectors of human disease and other pests.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QR Microbiology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- )
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Wolbachia -- Mathematical models, Host-bacteria relationships -- Mathematical models, Reaction-diffusion equations
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Publisher: The Royal Society Publishing
ISSN: 1742-5689
Date: 6 June 2012
Volume: Vol.9
Number: No.76
Page Range: pp. 3045-3054
Identification Number: 10.1098/​rsif.2012.0253
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Seventh Framework Programme (European Commission) (FP7/2007-2013), Wellcome Trust (London, England), Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Fogarty International Center. Research and Policy in Infectious Disease Dynamics Programme (RAPIDD)
Grant number: 223241 (FP7)
References: 1 Hilgenboecker, K., Hammerstein, P., Schlattmann, P., Telschow, A. & Werren, J. H. 2008 How many species are infected with Wolbachia?—a statistical analysis of current data. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 281, 215–220. (doi:10. 1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01110.x) 2 Laven, H. 1956 Cytoplasmic inheritance in Culex. Nature 177, 141–142. (doi:10.1038/177141a0) 3 Yen, J. H. & Barr, A. R. 1971 New hypothesis of the cause of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Culex pipiens. Nature 232, 657–658. (doi:10.1038/232657a0) 4 Werren, J. H. 1997 Biology ofWolbachia. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42, 587–609. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.587) 5 Bian, G. W., Xu, Y., Lu, P., Xie, Y. & Xi, Z. Y. 2010 The endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia induces resistance to dengue virus in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Pathog. 6, e1000833. (doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000833) 6 Kambris, Z., Blagborough, A. M., Pinto, S. B., Blagrove, M. S. C., Godfray, H. C. J., Sinden, R. E. & Sinkins, S. P. 2010 Wolbachia stimulates immune gene expression and inhibits Plasmodium development in Anopheles gambiae. PLoS Pathog. 6, e1001143. (doi:10.1371/journal. ppat.1001143) 7 Kambris, Z., Cook, P. E., Phuc, H. K. & Sinkins, S. P. 2009 Immune activation by life-shortening Wolbachia and reduced filarial competence in mosquitoes. Science 326, 134–136. (doi:10.1126/science.1177531) 8 Moreira, L. A. et al. 2009 AWolbachia symbiont in Aedes aegypti limits infection with dengue, chikungunya, and Plasmodium. Cell 139, 1268–1278. (doi:10.1016/j.cell. 2009.11.042). 9 McMeniman, C. J., Lane, R. V., Cass, B. N., Fong, A. W. C., Manpreet, S., Wang, Y. & O’Neill, S. L. 2009 Stable introduction of a life-shortening Wolbachia infection into the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Science 323, 141–144. (doi:10.1126/science.1165326). 10 Hoffmann, A. A. et al. 2011 Successful establishment of Wolbachia in Aedes populations to suppress dengue transmission. Nature 476, 454–457. (doi:10.1038/ nature10356). 11 Walker, T. et al. 2011 The wMel Wolbachia strain blocks dengue and invades caged Aedes aegypti populations. Nature 476, 450–453. (doi:10.1038/nature10355). 12 Jeffery, J. A. L., Nguyen Thi, Y., Vu Sinh, N., Le Trung, N., Hoffmann, A. A., Kay, B. H. & Ryan, P. A. 2009 Characterizing the Aedes aegypti population in a Vietnamese village in preparation for aWolbachia-based mosquito control strategy to eliminate dengue. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3, e552. (doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000552) 13 Dye, C. 1984 Models for the population dynamics of the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti. J. Anim. Ecol. 53, 247–268. (doi:10.2307/4355) 14 Harrington, L. C., Ponlawat, A., Edman, J. D., Scott, T. W. & Vermeylen, F. 2008 Influence of container size, location, and time of day on oviposition patterns of the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti, in Thailand. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 8, 415–423. (doi:10.1089/vbz.2007.0203) 15 Honorio, N. A., Codeco, C. T., Alvis, F. C., Magalhaes, M. A. F. M.&Lourenco-de-Oliveira, R. 2009 Temporal distribution of Aedes aegypti in different districts of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, measured by two types of traps. J. Med. Entomol. 46, 1001–1014. (doi:10.1603/033.046.0505) 16 Koenraadt, C. J. M., Aldstadt, J., Kijchalao, U., Sithiprasasna, R., Getis, A., Jones, J. W. & Scott, T. W. 2008 Spatial and temporal patterns in pupal and adult production of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 79, 230–238. 17 Scott, T. W., Morrison, A. C., Lorenz, L. H., Clark, G. G., Strickman, D., Kittayapong, P., Zhou, H. & Edman, J. D. 2000 Longitudinal studies of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand and Puerto Rico: Population dynamics. J. Med. Entomol. 37, 77–88. (doi:10.1603/ 0022-2585-37.1.77) 18 Sheppard, P. M., MacDonald, W. W., Tonn, R. J. & Grab, B. 1969 Dynamics of an adult population of Aedes aegypti in relation to dengue haemorrhagic fever in Bangkok. J. Anim. Ecol. 38, 661–702. (doi:10.2307/3042) 19 Legros, M., Lloyd, A. L., Huang, Y. X. & Gould, F. 2009 Density-dependent intraspecific competition in the larval stage of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): revisiting the current paradigm. J. Med. Entomol. 46, 409–419. (doi:10.1603/033.046.0301) 20 Schofield, P. 2002 Spatially explicit models of Turelli– Hoffmann Wolbachia invasive wave fronts. J. Theor. Biol. 215, 121–131. (doi:10.1006/jtbi.2001.2493). 21 Turelli, M. & Hoffmann, A. A. 1991 Rapid spread of an inherited incompatability factor in California Drosophila. Nature 353, 440–442. (doi:10.1038/353440a0) 22 Barton, N. H. & Turelli, M. 2011 Spatial waves of advance with bistable dynamics: cytoplasmic and genetic analogues of allee effects. Am. Nat. 138, E48–E75. (doi:10. 1086/661246) 23 Barton, N. H. 1979 The dynamics of hybrid zones. Heredity 43, 341–359. (doi:10.1038/hdy.1979.87) 24 Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. 1970 An introduction to population genetics theory, 1st edn. New York, NY: Harper & Row. 25 Nagylaki, T. 1975 Conditions for the existance of clines. Genetics 80, 595–615. 26 Hancock, P. A., Sinkins, S. P. & Godfray, H. C. J. 2011 Population dynamic models of the spread of Wolbachia. Am. Nat. 177, 323–333. (doi:10.1086/658121) 27 Rasgon, J. L. & Scott, T. W. 2004 Impact of population age structure on Wolbachia transgene driver efficacy: ecologically complex factors and release of genetically modified mosquitoes. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 34, 707–713. (doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.03.023) 28 Turelli, M. 1994 Evolution of incompatibility inducing microbes and their hosts. Evolution 48, 1500–1513. (doi:10.2307/2410244) 29 Flor, M., Hammerstein, P. & Telschow, A. 2007 Wolbachia-induced unidirectional cytoplasmic incompatibility and the stability of infection polymorphism in parapatric host populations. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 696–706. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01252.x) 30 Okubo, A. & Levin, S. A. 2001 Diffusion and ecological problems: modern perspectives. New York, NY: Springer. 31 Shigesada, N. & Kawasaki, K. 1997 Biological invasions: theory and practice. NewYork,NY: OxfordUniversity Press. 32 Yamazaki, F. & Shinozuka, M. 1990 Simulation of stochastic fields by statistical preconditioning. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 116, 268–287. (doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399 (1990)116:2(268)) 33 Hancock, P. A., Sinkins, S. P. & Godfray, H. C. J. 2011 Strategies for introducing Wolbachia to reduce transmission of mosquito-borne diseases. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 5, e1024. (doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001024) 34 Himler, A. G. et al. 2011 Rapid spread of a bacterial symbiont in an invasive whitefly is driven by fitness benefits and female bias. Science 332, 254–256. (doi:10.1126/ science.1199410) 35 Oliver, K. M., Moran, N. A. & Hunter, M. S. 2005 Variation in resistance to parasitism in aphids is due to symbionts not host genotype. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 12 795–12 800. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0506131102) 36 Barrowclough, G. F., Groth, J. G., Mertz, L. A. & Gutierrez, R. J. 2005 Genetic structure, introgression, and a narrow hybrid zone between northern and California spotted owls (Strix occidentalis). Mol. Ecol. 14, 1109–1120. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02465.x) 37 Barton, N. H. & Hewitt, G. M. 1989 Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones. Nature 341, 497–503. (doi:10. 1038/341497a0) 38 Ruegg, K. 2008 Genetic, morphological, and ecological characterization of a hybrid zone that spans a migratory divide. Evolution 62, 452–466. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646. 2007.00263.x) 39 Maini, P. K., Malaguti, L., Marcelli, C. & Matucci, S. 2007 Aggregative movement and front propagation for bi-stable population models. Math. Models Meth. Appl. Sci. 17, 1351–1368. (doi:10.1142/s0218202507002303) 40 Wang, M. H., Kot, M. & Neubert, M. G. 2002 Integrodifference equations, Allee effects, and invasions. J. Math. Biol. 44, 150–168. (doi:10.1007/s002850100116) 41 Azil, A. H., Long, S. A., Ritchie, S. A. & Williams, C. R. 2010 The development of predictive tools for pre-emptive dengue vector control: a study of Aedes aegypti abundance and meteorological variables in North Queensland, Australia. Trop. Med. Int. Health 15, 1190–1197. (doi:10. 1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02592.x) 42 Magori, K., Legros, M., Puente, M. E., Focks, D. A., Scott, T.W., Lloyd, A. L. & Gould, F. 2009 Skeeter buster: a stochastic, spatially explicit modeling tool for studying Aedes aegypti population replacement and population suppression strategies. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3, e508. (doi:10. 1371/journal.pntd.0000508) 43 Jansen, V. A. A., Turelli, M. & Godfray, H. C. J. 2008 Stochastic spread of Wolbachia. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 2769–2776. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0914) 44 Reuter, M., Lehmann, L. & Guillaume, F. 2008 The spread of incompatibility-inducing parasites in sub-divided host populations. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 134. (doi:10.1186/1471- 2148-8-134) 45 Russell, R. C., Webb, C. E., Williams, C. R. & Ritchie, S. A. 2005 Mark–release–recapture study to measure dispersal of the mosquito Aedes aegypti in Cairns, Queensland, Australia. Med. Vet. Ent. 19, 451–457. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2915.2005.00589.x) 46 Wong, J., Stoddard, S. T., Astete, H., Morrison, A. C. & Scott, T. W. 2011 Oviposition site selection by the dengue vector Aedes aegypti and its implications for dengue control. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 5, e1015. 47 Ellis, A. M. 2008 Linking movement and oviposition behaviour to spatial population distribution in the tree hole mosquito Ochlerotatus triseriatus. J. Anim. Ecol. 77, 156–166. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01319.x) 48 Vinatier, F., Tixier, P., Duyck, P. & Lescourret, F. 2011 Factors and mechanisms explaining spatial heterogeneity: a review of methods for insect populations. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2, 11–22. (doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X. 2010.00059.x) 49 Hedges, L. M., Brownlie, J. C., O’Neill, S. L. & Johnson, K. N. 2008 Wolbachia and virus protection in insects. Science 322, 702. (doi:10.1126/science.1162418) 50 Fenton, A., Johnson, K. N., Brownlie, J. C. & Hurst, G. D. D. 2011 Solving the Wolbachia paradox: modeling the tripartite interaction between host, Wolbachia, and a natural enemy. Am. Nat. 178, 333–342. (doi:10.1086/ 661247).
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/48861

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us