Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The baby effect and young male syndrome : social influences on cooperative risk-taking in women and men

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Fischer, Dominic and Hills, Thomas Trenholm. (2012) The baby effect and young male syndrome : social influences on cooperative risk-taking in women and men. Evolution and Human Behavior, Volume 33 (Number 5). pp. 530-536. ISSN 1090-5138

[img]
Preview
Text
WRAP_Hills_130812-fischerhills4jan2012forwarwick.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (405Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.01.0...

Abstract

Parental investment theory predicts differences in risk-taking for females and males as a consequence of reproductive context, with females attempting to reduce risks in relation to their own offspring (here called the baby effect) and males taking more risks in competition with one another (young male syndrome). The experiment we report tests these predictions in a cooperative context by introducing the Social Balloon Analogue Risk Task—the Balloon Analogue Risk Task modified to include a social partner (adult male, adult female, or baby)—along with a commitment device in which participants choose among several possible social partners, with whom they will share their earnings. Results were consistent with the predictions of parental investment theory. Females did not change their levels of risk-taking when paired with adult males or females, but showed a strong reduction in risk when paired with babies. Consistent with previous research, males were strongly inclined to take more risks when paired with another male of the same age, but males showed no change in risk-taking when paired with a female of the same age or a child. The current work provides the first experimental evidence of gender differences in cooperative social risk-taking, as well as the first experimental evidence of a mediator of female risk-taking, i.e., babies.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Risk-taking (Psychology) -- Testing, Risk-taking (Psychology) -- Sex differences, Mother and child -- Psychological aspects
Journal or Publication Title: Evolution and Human Behavior
Publisher: Elsevier Inc
ISSN: 1090-5138
Date: September 2012
Volume: Volume 33
Number: Number 5
Page Range: pp. 530-536
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.01.006
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Description: Corrected proof.
References: Baker, M. D., Jr., & Maner, J. K. (2008). Risk-taking as a situationally sensitive male mating strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 391-395. Baker, M. D., & Maner, J. K. (2009). Male risk-taking as a context-sensitive signaling device. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1136-1139. Bliege Bird, R., Smith, E. A., & Bird, D. W. (2001). The hunting handicap: costly signaling in human foraging strategies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 9-19. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49. Buss, D. M. (2004). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk-taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367-383. Clutton-Brock, T. (2002). Breeding together: Kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. Science, 269, 69-72. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1990). Killing the competition. Human Nature, 1, 83-109. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1994). Evolutionary psychology of male violence. In J. Archer (Ed.), Male violence (pp. 253-288). London: Routledge. Emlen, S. T. (1984). Cooperative breeding in birds and mammals. In J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioral Ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland: Massachusetts. Farthing, G. W. (2005). Attitudes toward heroic and nonheroic physical risk takers as mates and as friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 171-185. Fessler, D. M., Pillsworth, E. J., & Flamson, T. J. (2004). Angry men and disgusted women: An evolutionary approach to the influence of emotions on risk-taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 107-123. Fetchenhauer, D., & Buunk, B. (2005). How to explain gender differences in fear of crime: Towards an evolutionary approach. Sexualities, Evolution, and Gender, 7, 95-113. Kelly, S., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2001). Who dares, wins: heroism vs. altruism in women’s mate choice. Human Nature, 12, 89-105. Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., Strong, D. R., & Brown, R. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk-taking: The balloon analogue risk task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75-84. Lorian, C. N. & Grisham, J. R. (2010). The safety bias: Risk-avoidance and social anxiety pathology. Behaviour Change, 27, 29-41. Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Thompson, S. R. (2008). Adaptive memory: The comparative value of survival processing. Psychological Science, 19, 176-180. Platek, S. M., Burch, R. L., Panyavin, I. S., Wasserman, B. H., & Gallup Jr., G. G. (2002). Reactions towards children’s faces: Resemblance matters more for males than females. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 159 - 166. Ronay, R., & von Hippel, W. (2010). The presence of an attractive woman elevates testosterone and physical risk-taking in young men. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 57-64. Schwab, R. (1996). Gender differences in parental grief. Death Studies, 20, 103-113. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871-1971 (pp. 136-179). Chicago: Aldine. Waite, L. J. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32, 483-507. Wang, X. T., Kruger, D. J., & Wilke, A. (2009). Life history variables and risk-taking propensity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 77-84. Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263-290. Williams, G. C. (1975). Sex and evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, risk-taking, and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 59-73. Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection: A selection for handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205-214.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/49017

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us