Brassett, James and Rossdale, Chris (2010) The performance of global democracy : parody and/as the political. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. (CSGR Working Papers).

Preview

Text (Working paper) WRAP_Brassett_ 2_26910.pdf - Published Version Download (491Kb) | Preview

Abstract

The article develops a critical analysis of the debate on global democracy. Departing from common post-structural IR critiques of global democracy as (merely) a metaphor of escape that entrenches many of the sovereign logics it claims to contest, we explore what it would mean to engage the discourse of global democracy as an ongoing performative practice. After briefly outlining the relative positions of liberal reformist and cosmopolitan democrats – we argue that more attention can/should be paid to the ontopolitical foundations of global democracy. Drawing from William Connolly and Judith Butler, it is argued that fundamental (democratic) limits of the discourse are overlooked/re-produced, and even in the more ambitious cosmopolitan positions. Ontopolitical closures in relation to a problematic global scale and the universal assumption of individual agency/rights highlight the necessity of democratising ‘actually existing’ discourses of global democracy. We explore these ideas via a discussion of the cultural governance of global trade and resistance to it, especially via the activities of a UK based anarchist group called The Space Hijackers. By deploying parody the Space Hijackers can contribute to the debate on global democracy by provoking reflection upon fundamental assumptions about globalisation and ethics in everyday situations. They therefore problematise and subvert the problematic subjectivity of the ‘global-individual’ in a manner that might (but does not necessarily) allow for the imagination of alternative possibilities. The importance of this argument is that it resists the tendency of poststructural scepticism with regard to ethical discourses of global democracy, while retaining what is so promising: a turn towards singularity and imagination. Parody does not solve all problems, what could? But it does offer a modality within which subjects can imagine and act creatively with regards to the everyday closures of global democracy

Item Type:	Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects:	J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Democracy, Globalization
Series Name:	CSGR Working Papers
Publisher:	University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Place of Publication:	Coventry
Date:	2010
Volume:	Vol.2010
Number:	No.269
Status:	Not Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	Research Councils UK (RCUK)
References:	Beck, U. 2006. Cosmopolitan vision, trans. Ciaran Cronin, Cambridge: Polity Press. Bohman, J. (2007) Democracy Across Borders: From Dêmos to Dêmoi, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. Brassett, J. and Bulley, D. (2007) Ethics in World Politics: Cosmopolitanism and Beyond?' in International Politics, 2007, 44(1):1-18 Brassett, J. and Smith, W. (2010) ‘Deliberation and Global Civil Society: Agency, Arena, Affect’ in Review of International Studies Brassett, J. and Holmes, C. (2010) ‘International Political Economy and the Question of Ethics’ in Review of International Political Economy Buchanan, A. and R. O. Keohane, (2006) ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’, Ethics and International Affairs, 20(4), 405-437. Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge. Campbell, D. (2003) ‘Cultural governance and pictorial resistance: reflections on the imaging of war.’ Review of International Studies 29:57-73. Campbell, D. 2005. Beyond Choice: The Onto-politics of Critique. International Relations 19(1): 127-134. Connolly, W. (1987) Politics and Ambiguity. University of Wisconsin Press. Critchley, S. (2008) Infinitely Demanding: Ethics of Commitment, Politics of Resistance. London: Verso. Dahl, R. A. (1999) ‘Can international organizations be democratic? A sceptic’s view’, in I. Shapiro & C. Hacker-Cordón (eds.) Democracy’s Edges, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Devetak, R. and Higgott, R. (1999) Justice Unbound? Globalisation, States and the Transformation of the Social Bond. International Affairs 75(3):493–598. Dryzek, J. S. (2006) Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World. Cambridge: Polity. Fine, R. (2003) ‘Taking the “Ism” out of Cosmopolitanism: An Essay in Reconstruction’, European Journal of Social Theory 6(4): 451–70. Gaffney, E. (2010) A Critical Interrogation of Corporate Social Responsibility and Global Distributive Justice Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Warwick. Habermas, J. (2001): The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, trans. Max Pensky, Cambridge Mass.: Polity. Held, D. (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity. Held (1997) Held, D. and McGrew, A. (1998) The End of the Old Order? Globalization and the Prospects for World Order. Review of International Studies 24(5):219-245. Held, D and McGrew, A. (2002) “Introduction.” In Governing Globalization: Power Authority and Global Governance, edited by Held, D and McGrew, pp. 1-21. Cambridge: Polity Press Held, D. and McGrew, A. (2007) Globalization/Anti-Globalization: Beyond The Great Divide. Cambridge: Polity Press. Higgott, R. (2000) ‘Contested Globalisation: Changing Contexts and Normative Challenges’ Review of International Studies, 26, 2000: 131-154. Hoekman, B., and Kostecki,M. (2001) The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Keohane, R. ‘Legitimacy and Global Governance’ in Review of International Political Economy’, forthcoming Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (2001) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (Verso, 2nd Edition) Linklater, A.(1998) The Transformation of Political Community: ethical foundations of the post-Westphalian era. Oxford: Polity. Lisle, D. (2008) ‘Humanitarian Travels: Ethical Communication in Lonely Planet Guidebooks,’ Review of International Studies, Vol. 34, pp. 155-172. Newell, P. Democratising biotechnology? Deliberation, participation and social regulation in a neo-liberal world’ in Review of International Studies, forthcoming. Rawls, J. (1999) The Law of Peoples, With ‘‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’’ . Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Rosamond, B. (2003) Babylon and On: Globalization and International Political Economy. Review of International Political Economy 10(4): 661-671. Rossdale, C. (2010) ‘Anarchy is What Anarchists Make of It: Reclaiming the Concept of Agency in IR and Security Studies’, Millennium: Journal of International Relations, 39(2), forthcoming. Ruggie, J. (1993) Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations,” International Organization, 46 Shah, Nisha. 2006. Cosmopolitanizing and Decosmopolitanizing Globalization: Metaphorical Description and Transformations of Political Community. Globalizations 3(3): 393-412. Smith, W. ‘Deliberation Beyond Borders: The Public Reason of a Society of Peoples’ in Journal of International Political Theory, forthcoming. Smith, W. and Brassett, J. (2008) ‘Deliberation and Global Governance: Liberal, Cosmopolitan and Critical Perspectives’ in Ethics and International Affairs Vaughan-Williams, N. (2007) ‘Beyond a Cosmopolitan Ideal: The Politics of Singularity’, International Politics 44(1): 107–24. Walker, R. B. J. After the Globe, Before the World. Abingdon: Routledge. Watson, M. (2007) ‘Trade Justice and Individual Consumption Choices: Adam Smith’s Spectator Theory and the Moral Constitution of the Fair Trade Consumer’, European Journal of International Relations, 13(3).
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/49067

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item