Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Discussing perception, determining provision : teachers' perspectives on the applied options of A-level mathematics

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Ward-Penny, Robert, 1980-, Johnston-Wilder, Sue and Johnston-Wilder, Peter. (2012) Discussing perception, determining provision : teachers' perspectives on the applied options of A-level mathematics. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications . ISSN 1471-6976

[img] Text
WRAP_Johnston_Wilder_0671798-ie-270912-discussing_perception_determining_provision_accepted_version.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (370Kb)
Official URL: http://teamat.oxfordjournals.org/

Abstract

One-third of the current A-level mathematics curriculum is determined by choice, constructed out of ‘applied mathematics’ modules in mechanics, statistics and decision mathematics. Although this choice arguably involves the most sizeable instance of choice in the current English school mathematics curriculum, and it has a significant impact on students’ post-compulsory study of mathematics, it is not well understood how this choice is navigated. This paper explores how mathematics teachers perceive each of these three areas of applied mathematics, how widely each of the modules is offered, and in what ways perception might be connected to provision. Data from an online questionnaire and follow-up interviews demonstrates that teachers are influenced by a wide range of factors, including strategic concerns and views on the relative worth of each strand. The results also highlight the presence of inertia in centres’ provision. In this way this paper offers some insight into current perception and provision of applied mathematics in England, and speaks to contemporary debates about curriculum content and reform. It argues that students’ exposure to the powerful utility of mathematics is often unhelpfully steered or limited at a critical point in their education.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute of Education
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Applied mathematics -- Study and teaching (Higher) -- Great Britain, Applied mathematics -- Curricula -- Great Britain
Journal or Publication Title: Teaching Mathematics and its Applications
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 1471-6976
Date: 2012
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC)
References: BROWN, M. (1999) One Mathematics for All? Rethinking the Mathematics Curriculum (Hoyles, C., Morgan, C. & Woodhouse, G. eds.). London: Falmer Press, pp.78-89. COE, R., SEARLE, J., BARMBY, P., JONES, K. & HIGGINS, S. (2008) Relative difficulty of examinations in different subjects. CEM Centre, School of Education. Durham University. DOLTON, P.J. AND VIGNOLES, A. (2002) The Return on Post-Complulsory School Mathematics Study. Economica, 69, 113-141. ERNEST, P. (1991) The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer. GLASER, B.G. AND STRAUSS, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. New York: Aldane. GRAHAM, T. (2002) AS Mathematics: The results of a survey of schools and colleges. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 21(1), 11-28. HODGEN, J., PEPPER, D., STURMAN, L. & RUDDOCK, G. (2010) Is the UK an outlier? An international comparison of upper secondary mathematics education. London: Nuffield Foundation. KITCHEN, A. (1999) The Changing Profile of Entrants to Mathematics at A Level and to Mathematical Subjects in Higher Education. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 57-74. LEE, S., HARRISON, M.C. & ROBINSON, C.L. (2007) Recent changes in A-level Mathematics: is the availability and uptake of mechanics declining yet more? Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 26(3), 111-118. OFQUAL (2009) Review of Standards in GCE Mathematics in 2004 and 2007, [online] London: The Office of the Qualifications and Examinations Regulator. Available at: http://www.ofqual.gov.uk/files/ofqual-09- 4155_Review_of_standards_maths_2004-2007.pdf [accessed June 2011]. PORKESS, R. (2003) The new AS and A Levels in Mathematics. MSOR Connections, 3(4), 12-16. ROWLANDS, S. (2008) Why mechanics should be integral to secondary school mathematics. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 27(4), 187-199. QCA (2007) Evaluation of participation in GCE mathematics. Final report. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority Research Faculty.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/50089

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us