The Library
Does the Delphi process lead to increased accuracy in group-based judgmental forecasts or does it simply induce consensus amongst judgmental forecasters?
Tools
Tools
Tools
Bolger, Fergus, Stranieri, Andrew, Wright, George and Yearwood, John. (2011) Does the Delphi process lead to increased accuracy in group-based judgmental forecasts or does it simply induce consensus amongst judgmental forecasters? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78 (9). pp. 1671-1680. ISSN 0040-1625
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.06.002
Abstract
We investigate the relative impact of internal Delphi process factors – including panelists' degree of confidence, expertise, majority/minority positioning – and an external factor, richness of feedback – on opinion change and subsequent accuracy of judgmental forecasts. We found that panelists who had low confidence in their judgmental forecast and/or who were in a minority were more likely to change their opinion than those who were more confident and/or in a majority. The addition of rationales, or reasons, to the numeric feedback had little impact upon panelists' final forecasts, despite the quality of panelists' rationales being significantly positively correlated with accurate forecasts and thus of potential use to aid forecast improvement over Delphi rounds. Rather, the effect of rationales was similar to that of confidence: to pull panelists towards the majority opinion regardless of its correctness. We conclude that majority opinion is the strongest influence on panelists' opinion change in both the ‘standard’ Delphi, and Delphi-with-reasons. We make some suggestions for improved variants of the Delphi-with-reasons technique that should help reduce majority influence and thereby permit reasoned arguments to exert their proper pull on opinion change, resulting in forecast accuracy improvements over Delphi rounds. Highlights - Delphi panelists who have low confidence and/or are in a minority are more likely to change opinion than those in who are more confident and/or in a majority. - Majority opinion is the strongest influence on opinion change in Delphi. - We make recommendations to reduce the effects of majority influence on opinion change in Delphi. - Reasoned arguments should be allowed to exert their proper pull on opinion change in Delphi.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Operational Research & Management Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School |
| Journal or Publication Title: | Technological Forecasting and Social Change |
| Publisher: | Elsevier Science BV |
| ISSN: | 0040-1625 |
| Date: | November 2011 |
| Volume: | 78 |
| Number: | 9 |
| Page Range: | pp. 1671-1680 |
| Identification Number: | 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.06.002 |
| Status: | Peer Reviewed |
| Publication Status: | Published |
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
| Description: | A special issue of technological forecasting and social change. Guest editors: Gene Rowe and George Wright. |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/50124 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
