Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Influence of rivet to sheet edge distance on fatigue strength of self-piercing riveted aluminium joints

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Li, Dezhi, Han, Li, Thornton, M. and Shergold, M.. (2012) Influence of rivet to sheet edge distance on fatigue strength of self-piercing riveted aluminium joints. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol.558 . pp. 242-252. ISSN 09215093

[img]
Preview
Text
WRAP_Li_MSA_28949-Proof.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (2843Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (Cover sheet)
WRAP_li_Coversheet_Accepted.pdf

Download (203Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.07.119

Abstract

Self-piercing riveting (SPR) is one of the main joining methods for lightweight aluminium automotive body structures due to its advantages. In order to further optimise the structure design and reduce the weight but without compromising strength, reduction of redundant materials in the joint flange area can be considered. For this reason, the influence of rivet to sheet edge distance on the fatigue strengths of self-piercing riveted joints was studied. Five edge distances, 5 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm, 11.5 mm and 14.5 mm, were considered. The results showed that the SPR joints studied in this research had high fatigue resistance and all specimens failed in sheet material along joint buttons or next to rivet heads. For lap shear fatigue tests, specimens failed in the bottom sheet at low load amplitudes and in the top sheet at high load amplitudes except for specimens with very short edge distance of 5 and 6 mm; whereas, for coach-peel fatigue tests, all specimens failed in the top sheet. For both lap shear and coach-peel fatigue tests, specimens with an edge distance of 11.5 mm had the best fatigue resistance. It was found that for coach-peel fatigue, length of crack developing path before specimens lost their strengths was the main factor that determined the fatigue life of different specimens; for lap shear fatigue, the level of stress concentration and subsequent crack initiation time was the main factor that determined the fatigue life.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
T Technology > TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics
Divisions: Faculty of Science > WMG (Formerly the Warwick Manufacturing Group)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Riveted joints, Automobiles -- Bodies -- Design and construction, Automobiles -- Materials -- Fatigue, Aluminum -- Fatigue
Journal or Publication Title: Materials Science and Engineering: A
Publisher: Elsevier Science BV
ISSN: 09215093
Date: 2012
Volume: Vol.558
Page Range: pp. 242-252
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.07.119
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), Advantage West Midlands (AWM)
References: [1] A.R. Krause, A.R.A. Chernenkoff, SAE World Congress 1995. Paper no. 950710. [2] G.S. Boothetal., SAE World Congress 2000. Paper no. 2000-01-2681. [3] M. Zhou, S.J. Hu, H. Zhang, Weld. Res.Suppl. (1999) 305s–313s. [4] H. Yang, et al., Mater. Design 29 (2008)1679–1684. [5] D. Li, et al., Mater. Design 34 (2012)22–31. [6] C. P. Fung, J. Smart. Proc. IMech. G 211 (1997) 13–27. [7] L. Han, A. Chrysanthou, K.W. Young, Mater. Design 28 (2007) 2024–2033. [8] S. Kalluri, G.R. Halford, M.A. McGaw, Technical Memorandum 106881, 1995, NASA. [9] Y.K. Chen, et al., Wear 255 (2003) 1463–1470. [10] L. Han, A.Chrysanthou, J.M. O’Sullivan, Mater. Design 27 (2006) 200–208. [11] N.E. Fleck, C.S. Shin, R.A. Smith, Eng. Fract. Mech. 21 (1985) 173–185. [12] L.P. Pook, Metal Fatigue: What it is, Why it matters?, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2007. [13] A.H. Cottrell, Theory of Crystal Dislocations, Blackie and Son, London, 1964.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/50129

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us