The art of being human : a project for general philosophy of science
Fuller, Steve, 1959-. (2012) The art of being human : a project for general philosophy of science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Vol.43 (No.1). pp. 113-123. ISSN 0925-4560
WRAP_Fuller_101012-jgps_text_-_revised.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 August 2013.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10838-012-9181-5
Throughout the medieval and modern periods, in various sacred and secular guises, the unification of all forms of knowledge under the rubric of ‘science’ has been taken as the prerogative of humanity as a species. However, as our sense of species privilege has been called increasingly into question, so too has the very salience of ‘humanity’ and ‘science’ as general categories, let alone ones that might bear some essential relationship to each other. After showing how the ascendant Stanford School in the philosophy of science has contributed to this joint demystification of ‘humanity’ and ‘science’, I proceed on a more positive note to a conceptual framework for making sense of science as the art of being human. My understanding of ‘science’ is indebted to the red thread that runs from Christian theology through the Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment to the Humboldtian revival of the university as the site for the synthesis of knowledge as the culmination of self-development. Especially salient to this idea is science‘s epistemic capacity to manage modality (i.e. to determine the conditions under which possibilities can be actualised) and its political capacity to organize humanity into projects of universal concern. However, the challenge facing such an ideal in the twentyfirst century is that the predicate ‘human’ may be projected in three quite distinct ways, governed by what I call ‘ecological’, ‘biomedical’ and ‘cybernetic’ interests. Which one of these future humanities would claim today’s humans as proper ancestors and could these futures co-habit the same world thus become two important questions that general philosophy of science will need to address in the coming years.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||Q Science > Q Science (General)|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Science -- Philosophy|
|Journal or Publication Title:||Journal for General Philosophy of Science|
|Page Range:||pp. 113-123|
|Access rights to Published version:||Restricted or Subscription Access|
|References:||Blumenberg, H. (1983). The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. (Orig. 1966) Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Chalmers, D. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cochrane, A. (2010). ‘Undignified Bioethics’. Bioethics 24 (5): 234-41. The Economist (2010). ‘This house believes the development of computing was the most significant technological advance of the 20th century.’ (On-line debate, 19-29 October) http://www.economist.com/debate/days/view/598#mod_module Fuller, S. (1988). Social Epistemology. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press. Fuller, S. (2000). Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Fuller, S. (2006a). The New Sociological Imagination. London: Sage. Fuller, S. (2006b). The Philosophy of Science and Technology Studies. London: Routledge. Fuller, S. (2007a). The Knowledge Book: Key Concepts in Philosophy, Science and Culture. Durham UK: Acumen. Fuller, S. (2007b). Science vs Religion? Cambridge UK: Polity. Fuller, S. (2007c). New Frontiers in Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge UK: Polity. Fuller, S. (2008a). ‘The Normative Turn: Counterfactuals and a Philosophical Historiography of Science’. Isis 99: 576-584. Fuller, S. (2008b). Dissent over Descent. Cambridge UK: Icon. Fuller, S. (2010a). Science: The Art of Living. Durham UK: Acumen. Fuller, S. (2010b). 'Capitalism and Knowledge: The University between Commodification and Entrepreneurship', in H. Radder, ed., The Commodification of Academic Research: Science and the Modern University. (Pp. 277-306) Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Fuller, S. (2011). Humanity 2.0: The Past, Present and Future of What It Means to Be Human. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Galison, P. and Stump, D., eds. (1996). The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Palo Alto CA: Stanford University Press. Goodman, N. (1955). Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Humphreys, P. (2004). Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism and the Scientific Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, Truth and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd edn. (Orig. 1962). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kurzweil, R. (1999). The Age of Spiritual Machines. New York: Random House. Laudan, L. (1981). Science and Hypothesis. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Longino, H. (2001). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press. McConkey, J. (2004). ‘Knowledge and Acknowledgement: “Epistemic Injustice” as a Problem of Recognition’. Politics 24 (3): 198-205. Noble, D. (1997). The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention. New York: Alfred Knopf. Pichot, A. (2009). The Pure Society: From Darwin to Hitler. London: Verso. Popper, K. (1972). Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Popper, K. (1981). “The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions.” In I. Hacking (ed.), Scientific Revolutions. (Pp. 80-106) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rescher, N. (1998). Predicting the Future. Albany NY: SUNY Press. Rescher, N. (1999). The Limits of Science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Sarton, G. (1924). "The New Humanism." Isis 6: 9-24. Schlick, M. (1974). The General Theory of Knowledge (Orig. 1925) Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Singer, P. (1999). A Darwinian Left. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. Stanford, P.K. (2006). Exceeding Our Grasp. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Turkle, S. (1984). The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Weber, M. (1949). The Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: Free Press.|
Actions (login required)