Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

An evaluation and comparison of PLC programming techniques : innovation report

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Hajarnavis, Vivek (2006) An evaluation and comparison of PLC programming techniques : innovation report. EngD thesis, University of Warwick.

[img]
Preview
Text
WRAP_THESIS_Hajarnavis_2006.pdf - Submitted Version

Download (14Mb) | Preview
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b2116126~S1

Abstract

Few significant changes in Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) software design techniques have taken place since PLC's were first introduced in the 1960's. Programs written in the traditional language used in PLC's, ladder logic, are generally thought to be difficult to maintain and modify, and thus ill suited to the support of modem flexible manufacturing processes. This work demonstrates that the choice of PLC software structure used in a project has an impact on process flexibility with an appropriate choice providing significant cost savings in development time. An overview of work on formalised programming tools conducted in academia is provided together with a report on the PLC software structures used in industry. The factors influencing the choice of PLC and software structure are identified. Familiarity was found to be a major factor influencing selection. A method for comparing code structures, which allows the results to be expressed as a time saving (and consequently a cost) has been created. Implementation of this approach was used to show that the formalised programming tool under test provides a 33% increase in "right first time" rate together with an 80% time saving over traditional contact based ladder logic. Among experienced practitioners, performance with step-based ladder logic was found to be a close match to the formalised tool, demonstrating that the commonly perceived limitations are the result of the structure in which the language is used rather than a function of the programming tool itself. Further investigation of participant preferences among skilled PLC users showed a mismatch between their performance with a tool and their preference, with at least 25% selecting a tool based on their prior knowledge rather than performance. This highlights the need for the use of objective measures when conducting evaluations between products and technologies. With the information provided in this work, automation end users are provided with a mechanism for ensuring the selection of automation tools best suited to their business needs, whilst at the same time providing automation vendors with the ability to best demonstrate the strengths of the products.

Item Type: Thesis or Dissertation (EngD)
Subjects: T Technology > TS Manufactures
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Programmable controllers, Manufacturing processes -- Automation
Date: August 2006
Institution: University of Warwick
Theses Department: School of Engineering
Thesis Type: EngD
Publication Status: Unpublished
Supervisor(s)/Advisor: Young, Ken ; Daniels, Ray
Extent: x, 82 leaves
Language: eng
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/50598

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us