British Science Association. (2009a). British Science Festival Evaluation 2009. Retrieved 17
February, 2010, from http://www.britishscienceassociation.org/NR/rdonlyres/4C205493-
93D3-46DD-AC6C-CE9EDD8FA8B3/0/BritishScienceFestivalevaluation2009.pdf
British Science Association. (2009b). A History of the British Science Association. Retrieved 28
June, 2009, from
http://www.britishscienceassociation.org/web/AboutUs/OurHistory/index.htm
Buckley, N., & Hordijenko, S. (2011). Science Festivals. In D. Bennett & R. Jennings (Eds.),
Successful Science Communication (pp. 312-331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burchell, K., Franklin, S., & Holden, K. (2009). Public Culture as Professional Science: final report
of ScOPE project. Retrieved from
www2.lse.ac.uk/BIOS/research/scope/pdf/scope_final_report.pdf
Cambridge Science Festival. (2009). Internal Evaluation of 2009 Festival. Retrieved 17 February,
2010, from http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/sciencefestival/csf-evaluation-2009.pdf
Davies, S. (2009). Learning to engage; engaging to learn: the purposes of informal science-public
dialogue. In R.Holliman, E. Whitelegg, E. Scanlon, S. Smidt & J. Thomas (Eds.)
Investigating science communication in the information age (pp. 72-85). Oxford: Oxford
University Press
Dawson, E., & Jensen, E. (2011). Towards a 'contextual turn' in visitor research: Evaluating
audience segmentation and identity-related motivations. Visitor Studies, 14(2), 127-140.
Derrett, R. (2004). Festivals, events and the destination. In I. Yeoman, M.Robertson, J. Ali-Knight,
S. Drummond & U. McMahon-Beattie (Eds.), Festivals and event management: An
international arts and culture perspective (pp. 32-50). London: Elsevier.
EUSCEA. (2005). White Book on Science Communication Events in Europe. Vienna.
Goffman, E. (1961). Fun in games, in E. Goffman (ed.) Encounters: two studies in the sociology of
interaction, Indianapolis, Bob Merril.
Grant, L. (2004). Evaluation of Cheltenham Festival of Science. Retrieved 17 February, 2010,
from
http://www.lauragrantassociates.co.uk/Resources/Resources/6/Cheltenham%20festival%20e
valuation%202004.pdf
Holliman, R., Colllins, T., Jensen, E., & Taylor, P. (2009). ISOTOPE: Informing Science Outreach
and Public Engagement. Final Report of the NESTA-funded project. Milton Keynes: The
Open University.
Holliman, R., & Jensen, E. (2009). (In)authentic science and (im)partial publics: (Re)constructing
the science outreach and public engagement agenda. In R. Holliman, E. Whitelegg, E.
Scanlon, S. Smidt & J. Thomas (Eds.), Investigating science communication in the
information age: Implications for public engagement and popular media (pp. 35-52).
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holliman, R., Collins, T., Jensen, E. and Taylor, P. (2009). Isotope: Informing Science Outreach
and Public Engagement. Final Report of the Nesta-funded Isotope Project. Milton Keynes,
The Open University. ISBN: N978-1-84873-414-2.
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. (2000). Third Report on Science and
Society. London.
Irwin, A. (2008). Risk, science and public communication: third order thinking about scientific
culture. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Public Communication of Science and
Technology Handbook (pp. 199-212). London: Routledge.
Irwin, A. (2009). Moving forwards or in circles? Science communication and scientific governance
in an age of innovation. In R. Holliman, E. Whitelegg, E. Scanlon, S. Smidt & J. Thomas
(Eds.), Investigating science communication in the information age: Implications for public
engagement and popular media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jensen, E. (2008). The Dao of human cloning: Hope, fear and hype in the UK press and popular
films. Public Understanding of Science, 17(2), 123-143.
Jensen, E. (2011). Evaluate impact of communication. Nature, 469, 162.
Jensen, E., & Buckley, N. (2011). The Role of University Student Volunteers in Festival-based
Public Engagement. Bristol: National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement.
Jensen, E., & Holliman, R. (2009). Investigating science communication to inform science outreach
and public engagement. In R. Holliman, E. Whitelegg, E. Scanlon, S. Smidt & J. Thomas
(Eds.), Investigating science communication in the information age: Implications for public
engagement and popular media (pp. 55-71). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jensen, E., & Wagoner, B. (2009). A cyclical model of social change. Culture & Psychology, 15(2),
217-228.
Jensen, E. & Wagoner, B. (2012). ‘Conclusion: Cycles of social change’. In B. Wagoner, E. Jensen
and J. Oldmeadow (Eds.), Culture and Social Change: Transforming society through the
power of ideas. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between
research participants, Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), pp.103-121.
Kitzinger, J. and Barbour, R. (1999). Introduction: the challenge and promise of focus groups, in R.
Barbour, J. Kitzinger (eds.) Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice,
London, Sage.
MacNaghten, P., Kearnes, M. B., & Wynne, B. (2005). Nanotechnology, governance, and public
deliberation: What role for the social sciences? Science Communication, 27(2), 268-291.
MORI, I. (2011). Public Attitudes to Science 2011. Retrieved from http://www.ipsosmori.
com/Assets/Docs/Polls/sri-pas-2011-main-report.pdf
Nash, N., & Haste, H. (2007). Report on the BA Festival 2007. Retrieved 17 February, 2010 from
http://www.britishscienceassociation.org/NR/rdonlyres/9FC80E46-32C8-4151-9CBA-
6F239C0B7B62/0/Eventevaluation.pdf
National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement. (2011). What is Public Engagement?
Bristol: NCCPE.
Office of Science and Technology. (2004). UK Science Festivals: PEST or not? Retrieved 17
February, 2010, from http://www.britishscienceassociation.org/NR/rdonlyres/1B7E3D24-
6178-4747-AD3F-ED4324D9BA5E/0/OSTreport.pdf
Oxfordshire Science Festival. (2009). Evaluation Report. Retrieved 17 February, 2010, from
http://www.oxfordshiresciencefestival.co.uk/docs/OSF_2009_EvaluationReport.pdf
Research Councils UK. (2008). Public Attitudes to Science 2008. Swindon: RCUK.
Research Councils UK. (2010). Concordat on Engaging the Public with Science.
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. (2000). Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation.
Science, Technology and Human Values, 25(1), 3-29.
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science,
Technology and Human Values, 30(2), 251-290.
Science Festival Alliance. (2012). A first look at science festivals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Museum.
Retrieved 18 July, 2012, from http://sciencefestivals.org/news/140.html.
Stilgoe, J., Irwin, A., & Jones, K. (2006). The received wisdom: Opening up expert advice. London:
DEMOS.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for
developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Technopolis Group. (2008). Evaluation of the ESRC Festival of Social Science 2008. Retrieved 17
February, 2010, from
http://www.esrc.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/Images/942_FSS08%20Final%20Report_080717_t
cm6-28202.pdf
Wagoner, B. (2008). Developing 'development' in theory and method. In E. Abbey & R.
Diriwatcher (Eds.), Innovating genesis: Microgenesis and the constructive mind in action
(pp. 39-61). Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishers.
Wagoner, B., & Jensen, E. (2010). Science learning at the zoo: Evaluating children’s developing
understanding of animals and their habitats. Psychology & Society, 3(1), 65-76.
Wellcome Trust. (2010). Communicating your research: Festivals. Retrieved 17 February, 2010,
from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/Education-resources/Communicating-yourresearch/
Public-engagement-opportunities/Festivals/index.htm