Jensen, Eric, 1981- and Buckley, Nicola. (2012) Why people attend science festivals : interests, motivations and self-reported benefits of public engagement with research. Public Understanding of Science . ISSN 0963-6625 (In Press)

Preview

Text WRAP_Jensen_PubDocView_festivals.pdf - Accepted Version Download (500Kb) | Preview

Abstract

As a form of public engagement, science festivals have rapidly expanded in size and number over recent years. However, as with other domains of informal public engagement that are not linked to policy outcomes, existing research does not fully address science festivals’ impacts and popularity.This study adduces evidence from surveys and focus groups to elucidate the perspectives of visitors at a large UK science festival. Results show that visitors value the opportunities science festivals afford to interact with scientific researchers and to encounter different types of science engagement aimed at adults, children and families. The most significant self-reported impact of attending a science festival was the development of increased interest and curiosity about new areas of scientific knowledge within a socially stimulating and enjoyable setting.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HM Sociology Q Science > Q Science (General)
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Science fairs , Communication in science -- Great Britain, Science -- Exhibitions, Science -- Study and teaching
Journal or Publication Title:	Public Understanding of Science
Publisher:	Sage Publications Ltd.
ISSN:	0963-6625
Date:	31 October 2012
Identification Number:	10.1177/0963662512458624
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	In Press
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
References:	British Science Association. (2009a). British Science Festival Evaluation 2009. Retrieved 17 February, 2010, from http://www.britishscienceassociation.org/NR/rdonlyres/4C205493- 93D3-46DD-AC6C-CE9EDD8FA8B3/0/BritishScienceFestivalevaluation2009.pdf British Science Association. (2009b). A History of the British Science Association. Retrieved 28 June, 2009, from http://www.britishscienceassociation.org/web/AboutUs/OurHistory/index.htm Buckley, N., & Hordijenko, S. (2011). Science Festivals. In D. Bennett & R. Jennings (Eds.), Successful Science Communication (pp. 312-331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Burchell, K., Franklin, S., & Holden, K. (2009). Public Culture as Professional Science: final report of ScOPE project. Retrieved from www2.lse.ac.uk/BIOS/research/scope/pdf/scope_final_report.pdf Cambridge Science Festival. (2009). Internal Evaluation of 2009 Festival. Retrieved 17 February, 2010, from http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/sciencefestival/csf-evaluation-2009.pdf Davies, S. (2009). Learning to engage; engaging to learn: the purposes of informal science-public dialogue. In R.Holliman, E. Whitelegg, E. Scanlon, S. Smidt & J. Thomas (Eds.) Investigating science communication in the information age (pp. 72-85). Oxford: Oxford University Press Dawson, E., & Jensen, E. (2011). Towards a 'contextual turn' in visitor research: Evaluating audience segmentation and identity-related motivations. Visitor Studies, 14(2), 127-140. Derrett, R. (2004). Festivals, events and the destination. In I. Yeoman, M.Robertson, J. Ali-Knight, S. Drummond & U. McMahon-Beattie (Eds.), Festivals and event management: An international arts and culture perspective (pp. 32-50). London: Elsevier. EUSCEA. (2005). White Book on Science Communication Events in Europe. Vienna. Goffman, E. (1961). Fun in games, in E. Goffman (ed.) Encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction, Indianapolis, Bob Merril. Grant, L. (2004). Evaluation of Cheltenham Festival of Science. Retrieved 17 February, 2010, from http://www.lauragrantassociates.co.uk/Resources/Resources/6/Cheltenham%20festival%20e valuation%202004.pdf Holliman, R., Colllins, T., Jensen, E., & Taylor, P. (2009). ISOTOPE: Informing Science Outreach and Public Engagement. Final Report of the NESTA-funded project. Milton Keynes: The Open University. Holliman, R., & Jensen, E. (2009). (In)authentic science and (im)partial publics: (Re)constructing the science outreach and public engagement agenda. In R. Holliman, E. Whitelegg, E. Scanlon, S. Smidt & J. Thomas (Eds.), Investigating science communication in the information age: Implications for public engagement and popular media (pp. 35-52). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Holliman, R., Collins, T., Jensen, E. and Taylor, P. (2009). Isotope: Informing Science Outreach and Public Engagement. Final Report of the Nesta-funded Isotope Project. Milton Keynes, The Open University. ISBN: N978-1-84873-414-2. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. (2000). Third Report on Science and Society. London. Irwin, A. (2008). Risk, science and public communication: third order thinking about scientific culture. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Public Communication of Science and Technology Handbook (pp. 199-212). London: Routledge. Irwin, A. (2009). Moving forwards or in circles? Science communication and scientific governance in an age of innovation. In R. Holliman, E. Whitelegg, E. Scanlon, S. Smidt & J. Thomas (Eds.), Investigating science communication in the information age: Implications for public engagement and popular media. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jensen, E. (2008). The Dao of human cloning: Hope, fear and hype in the UK press and popular films. Public Understanding of Science, 17(2), 123-143. Jensen, E. (2011). Evaluate impact of communication. Nature, 469, 162. Jensen, E., & Buckley, N. (2011). The Role of University Student Volunteers in Festival-based Public Engagement. Bristol: National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement. Jensen, E., & Holliman, R. (2009). Investigating science communication to inform science outreach and public engagement. In R. Holliman, E. Whitelegg, E. Scanlon, S. Smidt & J. Thomas (Eds.), Investigating science communication in the information age: Implications for public engagement and popular media (pp. 55-71). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jensen, E., & Wagoner, B. (2009). A cyclical model of social change. Culture & Psychology, 15(2), 217-228. Jensen, E. & Wagoner, B. (2012). ‘Conclusion: Cycles of social change’. In B. Wagoner, E. Jensen and J. Oldmeadow (Eds.), Culture and Social Change: Transforming society through the power of ideas. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers. Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants, Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), pp.103-121. Kitzinger, J. and Barbour, R. (1999). Introduction: the challenge and promise of focus groups, in R. Barbour, J. Kitzinger (eds.) Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice, London, Sage. MacNaghten, P., Kearnes, M. B., & Wynne, B. (2005). Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: What role for the social sciences? Science Communication, 27(2), 268-291. MORI, I. (2011). Public Attitudes to Science 2011. Retrieved from http://www.ipsosmori. com/Assets/Docs/Polls/sri-pas-2011-main-report.pdf Nash, N., & Haste, H. (2007). Report on the BA Festival 2007. Retrieved 17 February, 2010 from http://www.britishscienceassociation.org/NR/rdonlyres/9FC80E46-32C8-4151-9CBA- 6F239C0B7B62/0/Eventevaluation.pdf National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement. (2011). What is Public Engagement? Bristol: NCCPE. Office of Science and Technology. (2004). UK Science Festivals: PEST or not? Retrieved 17 February, 2010, from http://www.britishscienceassociation.org/NR/rdonlyres/1B7E3D24- 6178-4747-AD3F-ED4324D9BA5E/0/OSTreport.pdf Oxfordshire Science Festival. (2009). Evaluation Report. Retrieved 17 February, 2010, from http://www.oxfordshiresciencefestival.co.uk/docs/OSF_2009_EvaluationReport.pdf Research Councils UK. (2008). Public Attitudes to Science 2008. Swindon: RCUK. Research Councils UK. (2010). Concordat on Engaging the Public with Science. Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. (2000). Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 25(1), 3-29. Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values, 30(2), 251-290. Science Festival Alliance. (2012). A first look at science festivals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Museum. Retrieved 18 July, 2012, from http://sciencefestivals.org/news/140.html. Stilgoe, J., Irwin, A., & Jones, K. (2006). The received wisdom: Opening up expert advice. London: DEMOS. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Technopolis Group. (2008). Evaluation of the ESRC Festival of Social Science 2008. Retrieved 17 February, 2010, from http://www.esrc.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/Images/942_FSS08%20Final%20Report_080717_t cm6-28202.pdf Wagoner, B. (2008). Developing 'development' in theory and method. In E. Abbey & R. Diriwatcher (Eds.), Innovating genesis: Microgenesis and the constructive mind in action (pp. 39-61). Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishers. Wagoner, B., & Jensen, E. (2010). Science learning at the zoo: Evaluating children’s developing understanding of animals and their habitats. Psychology & Society, 3(1), 65-76. Wellcome Trust. (2010). Communicating your research: Festivals. Retrieved 17 February, 2010, from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/Education-resources/Communicating-yourresearch/ Public-engagement-opportunities/Festivals/index.htm
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/50755

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item