Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Time to pregnancy : a computational method for using the duration of non-conception for predicting conception

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Sozou, Peter D. and Hartshorne, Geraldine M.. (2012) Time to pregnancy : a computational method for using the duration of non-conception for predicting conception. PLoS One, Vol.7 (No.10). e46544. ISSN 1932-6203

[img]
Preview
Text
WRAP_Sozou_journal.pone.0046544.pdf

Download (716Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046544

Abstract

An important problem in reproductive medicine is deciding when people who have failed to become pregnant without medical assistance should begin investigation and treatment. This study describes a computational approach to determining what can be deduced about a couple's future chances of pregnancy from the number of menstrual cycles over which they have been trying to conceive. The starting point is that a couple's fertility is inherently uncertain. This uncertainty is modelled as a probability distribution for the chance of conceiving in each menstrual cycle. We have developed a general numerical computational method, which uses Bayes' theorem to generate a posterior distribution for a couple's chance of conceiving in each cycle, conditional on the number of previous cycles of attempted conception. When various metrics of a couple's expected chances of pregnancy were computed as a function of the number of cycles over which they had been trying to conceive, we found good fits to observed data on time to pregnancy for different populations. The commonly-used standard of 12 cycles of non-conception as an indicator of subfertility was found to be reasonably robust, though a larger or smaller number of cycles may be more appropriate depending on the population from which a couple is drawn and the precise subfertility metric which is most relevant, for example the probability of conception in the next cycle or the next 12 cycles. We have also applied our computational method to model the impact of female reproductive ageing. Results indicate that, for women over the age of 35, it may be appropriate to start investigation and treatment more quickly than for younger women. Ignoring reproductive decline during the period of attempted conception added up to two cycles to the computed number of cycles before reaching a metric of subfertility.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Reproductive Health
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Conception -- Mathematical models, Infertility -- Mathematical models
Journal or Publication Title: PLoS One
Publisher: Public Library of Science
ISSN: 1932-6203
Date: 2012
Volume: Vol.7
Number: No.10
Page Range: e46544
Identification Number: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046544
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Wellcome Trust (London, England), Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
References: 1. Gnoth C, Godehardt D, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G (2003) Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility. Hum Reprod 18: 1959–1966. 2. Wang X, Chen C, Wang L, Chen D, Guang W, et al. (2003) Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: a population-based prospective study. Fertil Steril 79: 577–584. 3. Brosens I, Gordts S, Valkenburg M, Puttemans P, Campo R, et al. (2004) Investigation of the infertile couple: when is the appropriate time to explore female infertility? Hum Reprod 19: 1689–1692. 4. Gnoth C, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Friol K, Tigges, et al. (2005) Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility. Hum Reprod 20: 1144– 1147. 5. Evers JLH, de Haas HW, Land JA, Dunmoulin JCM, Dunselman GAJ (1998) Treatment-independent pregnancy rate in patients with severe reproductive disorders. Hum Reprod 13: 1206–1209. 6. Steures P, van der Steeg JW, Hompes PGA, Habbema JDF, Eijkemans MJC, et al. (2006) Intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation versus expectant management for couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet 368: 216–221. 7. Henry L (1972) On the Measurement of Human Fertility. Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier Publishing Company. 228p. 8. Leridon H (1973) Human Fertility: the Basic Components. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press. 202p. 9. te Velde ER, Eijkemans R, Habbema HDF (2000) Variation in couple fecundity and time to pregnancy, an essential concept in human reproduction. Lancet 355: 1928–1929. 10. Bongaatrs J, Potter RG (1983) Fertility, Biology and Behavior: an Analysis of the Proximate Determinants. San Diego: Academic Press. 230p. 11. Wood JW (1994) Dynamics of Human Reproduction: Biology, Biometry, Demography. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. 653p. 12. Potter RG, Parker MB (1964) Predicting the time required to conceive. Population Studies 18: 99–116. 13. Spira A (1986) Epidemiology of human reproduction. Hum Reprod 1: 111–115. 14. Hunault CC, Habbema JDF, Eijekemans MJC, Collins JA, Evers JLH, et al. (2004) Two new prediction rules for spontaneous pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples, based on the synthesis of three previous models. Hum Reprod 19: 2019–2026. 15. van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Eijkemans MJC, Habbema JDF, Hompes PGA, et al. (2007) Pregnancy is predictable: a large scale prospective external validation of pregnancy in subfertile couples. Hum Reprod 22: 536–542. 16. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (2010) Fertility Facts and Figures 2008. Available: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/2010-12-08_Fertility_ Facts_and_Figures_2008_Publication_PDF.PDF. Accessed 2011 Sept 4. 17. Sheps MC, Menken J A (1973) Mathematical Models of Conception and Birth. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press. 428p. 18. Bongaarts J (1975) A method for the estimation of fecundability. Demography 12: 645–660. 19. Leridon H, Spira A (1984) Problems in measuring the effectiveness of infertility therapy. Fertil Steril 41: 580–586. 20. Heckman JJ, Walker JR (1990) Estimating fecundability from data on waiting times to first conception. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 283–294. 21. Ecohard R (2006) Heterogeneity in fecundability studies: issues and modelling. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 15: 141–160. 22. Cramer DW, Walker AM, Schiff I (1979) Statistical methods in evaluating the outcome of infertility therapy. Fertil Ster 32: 80–86. 23. Evers JLH (2002) Female subfertility. Lancet 360: 151–159. 24. Leridon H (2008) A new estimate of permanent sterility by age: sterility defined as the inability to conceive. Population Studies 62: 15–24. 25. Salker M, Teklenburg G, Molokhia M, Lavery S, Trew G, et al. (2010) Natural selection of human embryos: impaired decidualization of endometrium disables embryo-maternal interactions and causes recurrent pregnancy loss. PLoS ONE 5: e10287. 26. Faddy MJ, Gosden RG (1995) A mathematical model of follicle dynamics in the human ovary. Hum Reprod 10: 770–775. 27. Maheshwari A, Gibreel A, Bhattacharya S, Johnson NP (2009) Dynamic tests of ovarian reserve: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy. RBMOnline 18: 717–734. 28. Dunson D B, Baird D D, Colombo B (2004) Increased infertility with age in men and women. Obstetrics and Gynecology 103: 51–56. 29. Sozou PD (1998) On hyperbolic discounting and uncertain hazard rates. Proc Roy Soc B 265: 2015–2020. 30. Lindley DV (1965) Introduction to probability and statistics from a Bayesian viewpoint. 2. Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 292p. 31. Maruani P, Schwartz D (1983) Sterility and fecundability estimation. J Theor Biol 105: 211–219. 32. Forbes C, Evans M, Hastings N, Peacock B (2011) Statistical Distributions. Fourth Edition, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey. 212p 33. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Fertility Assessment and Treatment for People with Fertility Problems. London: RCOG Press. 216p. 34. Leridon H, Slama R (2008) The impact of a decline in fecundity and of pregnancy postponement on final number of children and demand for assisted reproduction technology. Hum Reprod 23: 1312–1319. 35. Juul S, Karmaus W, Olsen J, European Infertility and Subfecundity Study Group (1999) Regional differences in waiting time to pregnancy: pregnancybased surveys from Denmark, France, Germany, Italy and Sweden. Hum Reprod 14, 1250–1254. 36. Potter RG Jr (1960) Length of the observation period as a factor affecting the contraceptive failure rate. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 38: 140–152. 37. Roberts SA, Stylianou C (2012) The non-independence of treatment outcomes from repeat IVF cycles: estimates and consequences. Hum Reprod 27: 436–443. 38. van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Eijkemans MJC, Habbema JDF, Hompes PGA, et al. (2008) Predictive value of pregnancy history in subfertile couples: results from a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. Fertil Steril 90: 521–527. 39. Whitworth KW, Baird DD, Stene LC, Skjaerven R, Longnecker MP (2011) Fecundability among women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the Norwegian mother and child cohort study. Diabetologia 54: 516–522. 40. Greenland S (2006) Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research I: foundations and basic methods. Int J Epidemiol 35: 765–775. 41. Nelson SM, Lawlor DA (2011) Predicting live birth, preterm delivery, and low birth weight in infants born from in vitro fertilisation: a prospective study of 144,018 treatment cycles. PLoS Med 8:e1000386. 42. Granstro¨m M, Tindberg Y, Blennow M (1997) Seroepidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection in a cohort of children monitored from 6 months to 11 years of age. J Clin Microbiol 35: 468–470. 43. Parks KS, Dixon PB, Richey CM, Hook EW III (1997) Spontaneous clearance of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in untreated patients. Sex Transm Dis 24: 229–235. 44. Geisler WM, Wang C, Morrison SG, Black CM, Bandea CI, et al. (2008) The natural history of untreated Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the interval between screening and treatment. Sex Transm Dis 35: 119–123. 45. Lehmann M, Meyer MF, Monazahian M, Tillmann HL, Manns MP, et al. (2004) High rate of spontaneous clearance of acute hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection. J Med Virol 73: 387–391.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/50807

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us