Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Counter-terrorism and the counterfactual : producing the ‘radicalisation’ discourse and the UK PREVENT Strategy

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Heath-Kelly, Charlotte (2012) Counter-terrorism and the counterfactual : producing the ‘radicalisation’ discourse and the UK PREVENT Strategy. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations . ISSN 1369-1481 (In Press)

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00489.x

Abstract

This article interrogates the production of the ‘radicalisation’ discourse which underpins efforts to govern ‘terrorism’ pre-emptively through the UK's PREVENT strategy. British counter-terrorism currently relies upon the invention of ‘radicalisation’ and related knowledge about transitions to ‘terrorism’ to undertake governance of communities rendered suspicious. The article argues that such conceptions make terrorism knowable and governable through conceptions of risk. Radicalisation knowledge provides a counterfactual to terrorism—enabling governmental intervention in its supposed production. It makes the future actionable. However, while the deployment of ‘radicalisation’ functions to make terrorism pre-emptively governable and knowable, it also renders PREVENT unstable by simultaneously presenting ‘vulnerability indicators’ for radicalisation as threats to the wider collective—these conducts are framed as both ‘at risk’ and ‘risky’, both vulnerable and dangerous. This instability speaks to ad hoc production of the radicalisation discourse by scholarly and policy-making communities for the governance of terrorism through radicalisation knowledge. This article analyses the production of the radicalisation discourse to explore its performance as a form of risk governance within British counter-terrorism.

Item Type: Submitted Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Journal or Publication Title: The British Journal of Politics & International Relations
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1369-1481
Date: 2012
Identification Number: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00489.x
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: In Press
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/51107

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us