Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Ownership structure, voting and risk

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Dhillon, Amrita (2011) Ownership structure, voting and risk. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick..

[img]
Preview
Text
WRAP_Dhillon_ownership_structure_Sept2011.pdf - Draft Version

Download (702Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/...

Abstract

We analyze the determinants of ownership structure in firms when conflicts of interest on risk arise endogenously via different ownership stakes and firm decisions are made through majority voting. A large block is chosen to incentivize monitoring. Because a large blockholder holds a large share of the firm, he is averse to risky investing. This generates a conflict of interest with dispersed shareholders. Mid-size blockholders, voting in favor of middle of the road projects, mitigate the conflict of interest. Depending on monitoring costs, voting institutions and the nature of the industry, three types of ownership structures arise: one large shareholder with a fringe of dispersed owners, multiple large shareholders and fully dispersed shareholders.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Stockholders -- Econometric models, Voting -- Econometric models, Financial risk -- Econometric models
Publisher: University of Warwick
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: 16 September 2011
Number of Pages: 56
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Admati, A. R., P. Pfleiderer, and J. Zechner (1994): “Large Shareholder Activism, Risk Sharing, and Financial Market Equilibrium,” Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1097–1130. Barclay, M. J., and C. G. Holderness (1989): “Private Benefit from Control of Public Corporations,” Journal of Financial Economics, 25(2), 371–395. Becht, M., J. Franks, C. Mayer, and S. Rossi (2009): “Returns to Shareholder Activism: Evidence from a Clinical Study of the Hermes UK Focus Fund,” Rev. Financ. Stud., 22(8), 3093–3129. Bennedsen, M., and D. Wolfenzon (2000): “The balance of power in closely held corporations,” Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 113–139. Black, D. (1948): “On the rationale of group decision-making,” Journal of Political Economy, 56(1), 23–34. Bolton, P., and E. L. Von Thadden (1998): “Blocks, Liquidity, and Corporate Control,” The Journal of Finance, 53(1), 1–25. Boulton, T. J., S. B. Smart, and C. J. Zutter (forthcoming): “IPO Underpricing and the Market for Corporate Control,” Journal of International Business Studies. Brav, A., W. Jiang, F. Partnoy, and R. S. Thomas (2008): “Hedge Fund Activism, Corporate Governance, and Firm Performance,” The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1729–1775. Brennan, M., and J. Franks (1997): “Underpricing, ownership and control in initial public offerings of equity securities in the UK,” Journal of Financial Economics, 45(3), 391–413. Burkart, M., D. Gromb, and F. Panunzi (1997): “Large Shareholders, Monitoring, and the Value of the Firm,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3), 693–728. Carlin, W., and C. Mayer (2000): “How Do Financial Systems Affect Economic Performance?,” in Corporate Governance: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, ed. by X. Vives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. (2003): “Finance, investment, and growth,” Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1), 191–226. Clark, J., and K. Shastri (2000): “On Information Asymmetry Indices,” Unpublished manuscript. DeMarzo, P. M., and B. Urosevic (2006): “Ownership Dynamics and Asset Pricing with a Large Shareholder,” Journal of Political Economy, 114(4), 774–815. Dhillon, A. (2005): “Poliltical Parties and Coalition Formation,” in Group Formation in Economics: Networks, Clubs and Coalitions, ed. by G. Demange, and M. Wooders. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Dlugosz, J., R. Fahlenbrach, P. Gompers, and A. Metrick (2006): “Large Blocks of stock: Prevalence, size and measurement,” . Edmans, A., and G. Manso (2008): “Governance Through Exit and Voice: A Theory of Multiple Blockholders,” Discussion Paper 225/2006, ECGI. Faccio, M., L. H. P. Lang, and L. Young (2001): “Who Disciplines Management in Poorly Performing Companies?,” American Economic Review, 91(1), 54–78. Faccio, M., M.-T. Marchica, and R. Mura (2009): “Large Shareholder Diversification and Corporate Risk-Taking,” Unpublished manuscript. Fernando, C. S., S. Krishnamurthy, and P. A. Spindt (2004): “Are Share Price Levels Informative? Evidence from the Ownership, Pricing, Turnover, and Performance of IPO Firms,” Journal of Financial Markets, 7(4), 377–403. Goergen, M., and L. Renneboog (2002): “Prediction of Ownership and Control Concentration in German and UK Initial Public Offerings,” in Convergence and Diversity of Corporate Governance Regimes and Capital Markets, ed. by J. McCahery, P. Moerland, T. Raaijmakers, and L. Renneboog, pp. 251–267. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Gomes, A., and W. Novaes (2001): “Sharing of Control as a Corporate Governance Mechanism,” Discussion Paper PIER Working paper 01-029, University of Pennsylvania Law School. Grossman, S. J., and O. D. Hart (1980): “Takeover Bids, the Free-Rider Problem: and the Theory of Corporation,” Bell Journal of Economics, 11(1), 42–64. Gutierrez, M., and J. A. Tribo (2004): “Private Benefits Extraction In Closely-Held Corporations: The Case For Multiple Large Shareholders,” Discussion Paper 53/2004, ECGI. Helwege, J., V. Intintoli, and A. J. Zhang (2011): “Voting with their feet or activism? Institutional Investors impact on CEO turnover,” Unpublished manuscript. Holmstrom, B., and J. Tirole (1993): “Market Liquidity and Performance Monitoring,” Journal of Political Economy, 101(4), 678–709. John, Kose, L. L. P. Y. B. Y. (2008): “Corporate Governance and Risk taking: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1607–1728. Kirchmaier, T., and J. Grant (2005): “Corporate Ownership Structure and Performance in Europe,” European Management Review, 2(3), 231–245. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, and A. Shleifer (1999): “Corporate Ownership Around the World,” The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. Laeven, L., and R. Levine (2008a): “Bank Governance, Regulation and Risk taking,” . (2008b): “Complex Ownership Structures and Corporate Valuations,” Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 579–604. Lehmann, E., and J.Weigand (2000): “Does the Governed Corporation Perform Better? Governance Structures and Corporate Performance in Germany,” European Finance Review, 4(2), 157–195. Maug, E. (1998): “Large Shareholders as Monitors: Is there a tradeoff between liquidity and control?,” The Journal of Finance, 53(1), 65–98. Maury, B., and A. Pajuste (2005): “Multiple Large Shareholders and Firm Value,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 29(7), 1813–1834. Nagata, K., and S. Rhee (2009): “Ownership, Control and Underpricing in Initial Public Offerings: Evidence from Japan,” Unpublished manuscript. Noe, T. H. (2002): “Investor Activism and Financial Market Structure,” Review of Financial Studies, 15(1), 289–318. Pagano, M., and A. R¨oell (1998): “The Choice of Stock Ownership Structure: Agency Costs, Monitoring, and the Decision to Go Public,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 187–226. Roosenboom, P., and W. Schramade (2006): “The price of power: Valuing the controlling position of owner-managers in French IPO firms,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 270–295. Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny (1986): “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control,” Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461–488. Smith, M. P. (1996): “Shareholder Activism by Institutional Investors: Evidence for CalPERS,” Journal of Finance, 51(1), 227–52. Stiglitz, J. E. (1985): “Credit Markets and the Control of Capital,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 12(2), 133–152. Stoughton, N., and J. Zechner (1998): “IPO-Mechanisms, Monitoring and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 49(1), 45–77. The Economist (2009): “Business: The ties that bind; The Wallenbergs,” 390(8615), 68. Volpin, P. (2002): “Governance with poor investor protection: evidence from top executive turnover in Italy,” Journal of Financial Economics, 64(1), 61–90. Yeh, Y. H., and P.-G. Shu (2004): “Corporate Governance and Valuation of IPOs,” Unpublished manuscript. Yermack, D. (2010): “Shareholder Voting and Corporate Governance,” Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2, 103–125. Zwiebel, J. (1995): “Block Investment and Partial Benefits of Corporate Control,” Review of Economic Studies, 62(2), 161–185.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/51385

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us