Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Europe, knowledge, politics engaging with the limits : the C.A.S.E. collective responds

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

C.A.S.E. Collective (Including: Aradau, Claudia , Bell, Colleen, Bonditti, Philippe, Davidshofer, Stephan, Guillaume, Xavier , Huysmans, Jef, Jeandesboz, Julien , Jutila, Matti , McCormack, Tara , Neal, Andrew, Olsson, Christian , Ragazzi, Francesco , Squire, Vicki, Stritzel, Holger , van Munster , Rens and Williams, Michael C.). (2007) Europe, knowledge, politics engaging with the limits : the C.A.S.E. collective responds. Security Dialogue, Vol.38 (No.4). pp. 559-576. doi:10.1177/0967010607085002

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0967010607085002

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

HAVING ONE’S WORK closely read and critically debated is a rare pleasure. It was thus with great joy that we saw that our collective article ‘Critical Approaches to Security in Europe: A Networked Manifesto’ (c.a.s.e. collective, 2006) provoked several thoughtful responses to
the theoretical premises of the manifesto and its intellectual and political ramifications. The replies to the manifesto created a new space of selfinterrogation in which the c.a.s.e. collective grappled with some of the limits that our critics addressed. Before we address some of these more directly, it may be useful to restate the original objective of the collective manifesto.
First, the authors that were part of the collective had a desire to push critical innovations in security studies beyond the framing of critical security studies
in terms of schools. The aim of working and writing as a collective, as a network of scholars who do not agree on everything yet share a common perspective, was based on a desire to break with the competitive dynamics of
individualist research agendas. Alluding to the emancipatory connotations of the word ‘manifesto’,
the aim of the article was to carve out and open up
an intellectual space for critical thinking – both in the disciplinary sense of formulating an alternative space to mainstream security studies and in the political sense of thinking through the ethico-political implications of
security and securitization

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Journal or Publication Title: Security Dialogue
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
ISSN: 0967-0106
Official Date: 2007
Dates:
DateEvent
2007UNSPECIFIED
Volume: Vol.38
Number: No.4
Page Range: pp. 559-576
DOI: 10.1177/0967010607085002
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Description:

The members of the C.A.S.E. collective who contributed to this piece are Claudia Aradau, Colleen Bell, Philippe Bonditti, Stephan Davidshofer, Xavier Guillaume, Jef Huysmans, Julien Jeandesboz, Matti Jutila, Tara McCormack, Andrew Neal, Christian Olsson, Francesco Ragazzi, Vicki Squire, Holger Stritzel, Rens van Munster and Michael C. Williams.

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us