The Library
Europe, knowledge, politics engaging with the limits : the C.A.S.E. collective responds
Tools
Tools
Tools
C.A.S.E. Collective (Including: Aradau, Claudia , Bell, Colleen, Bonditti, Philippe, Davidshofer, Stephan, Guillaume, Xavier , Huysmans, Jef, Jeandesboz, Julien , Jutila, Matti , McCormack, Tara , Neal, Andrew, Olsson, Christian , Ragazzi, Francesco , Squire, Vicki, Stritzel, Holger , van Munster , Rens and Williams, Michael C.). (2007) Europe, knowledge, politics engaging with the limits : the C.A.S.E. collective responds. Security Dialogue, Vol.38 (No.4). pp. 559-576. doi:10.1177/0967010607085002
Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0967010607085002
Abstract
HAVING ONE’S WORK closely read and critically debated is a rare pleasure. It was thus with great joy that we saw that our collective article ‘Critical Approaches to Security in Europe: A Networked Manifesto’ (c.a.s.e. collective, 2006) provoked several thoughtful responses to
the theoretical premises of the manifesto and its intellectual and political ramifications. The replies to the manifesto created a new space of selfinterrogation in which the c.a.s.e. collective grappled with some of the limits that our critics addressed. Before we address some of these more directly, it may be useful to restate the original objective of the collective manifesto.
First, the authors that were part of the collective had a desire to push critical innovations in security studies beyond the framing of critical security studies
in terms of schools. The aim of working and writing as a collective, as a network of scholars who do not agree on everything yet share a common perspective, was based on a desire to break with the competitive dynamics of
individualist research agendas. Alluding to the emancipatory connotations of the word ‘manifesto’,
the aim of the article was to carve out and open up
an intellectual space for critical thinking – both in the disciplinary sense of formulating an alternative space to mainstream security studies and in the political sense of thinking through the ethico-political implications of
security and securitization
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Security Dialogue | ||||
| Publisher: | Sage Publications Ltd. | ||||
| ISSN: | 0967-0106 | ||||
| Official Date: | 2007 | ||||
| Dates: |
|
||||
| Volume: | Vol.38 | ||||
| Number: | No.4 | ||||
| Page Range: | pp. 559-576 | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1177/0967010607085002 | ||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||
| Description: | The members of the C.A.S.E. collective who contributed to this piece are Claudia Aradau, Colleen Bell, Philippe Bonditti, Stephan Davidshofer, Xavier Guillaume, Jef Huysmans, Julien Jeandesboz, Matti Jutila, Tara McCormack, Andrew Neal, Christian Olsson, Francesco Ragazzi, Vicki Squire, Holger Stritzel, Rens van Munster and Michael C. Williams. |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
