The Library

Measuring mathematical resilience : an application of the construct of resilience to the study of mathematics

Tools

Kooken, Janice , Welsh, Megan E., Mccoach, D. Betsy, Johnston-Wilder, Sue and Lee, Clare (2012) Measuring mathematical resilience : an application of the construct of resilience to the study of mathematics. In: AERA 2013, San Francisco, California, 27 Apr-1 May 2013 (Submitted)

Preview

Text (Submitted conference paper)
WRAP_Johnston_aera paper.pdf - Accepted Version
Download (444Kb) | Preview

Official URL: http://www.aera.net/

Abstract

To meet the challenge of accelerating demands for quantitative literacy in the work force,
improvements are needed in mathematics education. Student skill must be increased at all ability
levels while also reducing the achievement gap across gender, racial and ethnic groups to
increase their participation in advanced mathematics coursework and representation in
mathematics related careers (National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008). Research has shown
that affective traits such as motivation and attitude are linked to increased likelihood of taking
advanced mathematics courses (Ma, 2006) and are significant predictors of improved cognitive
activity and achievement (Buff, Reusser, Rakoczy,& Pauli, 2011; Ethington & Wolfe, 1986). In
addition, males generally score more favorably than females on affective variables related to
mathematics achievement and persistence (McGraw, Lubienski, & Strutchens, 2006; Sherman &
Fennema, 1977; Wilkins and Ma, 2003). Although psychological resilience has been researched
extensively (Luthar, Cicchetti, & Becker, 2000; Luthar, 2007) the study of mathematical
resilience, defined as a positive adaptive stance to mathematics which allows students to
continue learning despite adversity, represents a new approach (Johnston-Wilder & Lee, 2010;
Rivera & Waxman, 2011). Math anxiety looks at maladaptive response to learning mathematics
and is well-studied (Hembree, 1990; Richardson & Suinn, 1977; Tobias, 1978). In contrast,
resilience incorporates factors associated with optimal functioning. Although mathematical
resilience has been identified as important for success (Johnston-Wilder & Lee, 2010; Rivera &
Waxman, 2011), little consensus exists around its definition and no measures of resilience have
been rigorously developed and/or validated. Rivera & Waxman (2011) identified the use of
teacher nomination of resilient students as a limitation of their study, further motivating
development of an instrument. This presentation will report on efforts to develop and validate an
instrument measuring mathematical resilience. Ultimately, the measure will aid in developing
and testing models that gauge the role of mathematical resilience in student achievement and
persistence in advanced coursework. These models can be used to develop interventions to
improve mathematical resilience, achievement, and quantitative literacy (Johnston-Wilder &
Lee, 2010).

Item Type:

Conference Item (Paper)

Subjects:

B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education

Divisions:

Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute of Education ( -2013)

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

Mathematics -- Study and teaching, Resilience (Personality trait)

Official Date:

2012

Dates:

Date	Event
2012	Published

Status:

Not Peer Reviewed

Publication Status:

Submitted

Conference Paper Type:

Paper

Title of Event:

AERA 2013

Type of Event:

Conference

Location of Event:

San Francisco, California

Date(s) of Event:

27 Apr-1 May 2013

Related URLs:

Organisation

References:

Arbuckle, J. L. (2009). Amos (Version 18.0.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: SPSS.
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist,
44 (9), 1175-1184.
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in
Psychological Science, 9 (3), 75-78.
Buff, A., Reusser, K., Rakoczy, K. & Pauli, C. (2011) Activating positive affective experiences in the classroom: “Nice to have” or something more? Learning and Instruction, 21, pp. 452-466.
Chouinard, R., & Roy, N. (2007). Relations among competence beliefs, utility value,
achievement goals, and effort in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 501–517.
Dweck, C. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Lillington NC: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis.
Ethington, C.A. & Wolfe, L.M. (1986). A structural model of mathematics achievement for men and women. American Educational Research Journal, 23, pp. 65-75.
Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21 (1), 33-46.
Johnston-Wilder, S & Lee, C. (2010). Mathematical resilience. Mathematics Teaching, 218, 38-41.
Johnston-Wilder, S & Lee, C. (2010). “Developing mathematical resilience.” Berea Conference Paper, University of Warwick, UK.
Karairmak, O. (2010). Establishing the psychometric qualities of the Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD_RISC) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in a trauma survivor sample. Psychiatry Research. 179, 350-356.
Luthar, S. (2007). Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades. Developmental Psychopathology, 739-783.
Luthar, S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The Construct of Resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543-562.
Ma, X. (2006). Cognitive and affective changes as determinants for taking advanced mathematics courses in high school. American Journal of Education, 113, pp. 123-149.
McGraw, R., Luebienski, S., & Strutchens, M. (2006). A Closer Look at Gender in NAEP Mathematics Achievement and Affect Data: Intersections with Achievement, Race/Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 129-150.
McKenzie, J. F., Wood, M. L., Kotecki, J. E., Clark, J. K., & Brey, R. A. (1999). Establishing content validity: using qualitative and quantitative steps. American Journal of Human Behavior, 23, 311-318.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008). Foundations for Success: The
Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel, U.S. Department of
Education: Washington, DC.
Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Richardson, F. C. and Suinn, Richard M. (1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 551-554.
Rivera, H, & Waxman, H. (2011). Resilience and nonresilient Hispanic English language learners’ attitudes towards their classroom learning environment in mathematics. Journal for Education for Students Place at Risk, 16, 185-200.
Sherman, J & Fennema, E. (1977). The study of mathematics by high school girls and boys: related variables. American Educational Research Journal, 14 (2), 159-169.
SPSS Inc. (2009). PASW STATISTICS 18.0 [Computer Program]. SPSS Inc., Chicago.
Thompson, B. (2010). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Tobias, S. (1978). Overcoming math anxiety. New York: Norton
Wilkins, J. & Ma, X. (2003). Modeling change in student attitude toward and beliefs about mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research, 97, 52-64.