Einav, Shiri and Robinson, Elizabeth J.. (2010) Children's sensitivity to error magnitude when evaluating informants. Cognitive Development, Vol.25 (No.3). pp. 218-232. ISSN 0885-2014

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Three experiments examined children's (N = 80; 40; 48) sensitivity to error magnitude as a measure of informants' past accuracy, and indication of future reliability. Experiments 1 and 2 assessed whether, in a forced-choice task, children would evaluate as better and show greater trust in an informant whose previous errors were consistently within close range of the correct answer than one whose errors were more extreme. Six-to-seven-year olds displayed such sensitivity in an animal-labeling context (Experiment 1), whereas 4-5-year olds did so only in a number context, where the magnitude of errors was more obviously quantifiable (Experiment 2). Given a free choice in Experiment 3, 6- and 7-year olds preferred to guess the answers themselves rather than accept the claims of either informant. Only the older children's guesses, however, were informed by the testimony of the previously closer informant, indicating an increased awareness that this informant's claims could guide them toward the correct answers. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Trust, Children -- Attitudes, Selectivity (Psychology) -- Research, Reliability
Journal or Publication Title:	Cognitive Development
Publisher:	Elsevier
ISSN:	0885-2014
Date:	July 2010
Volume:	Vol.25
Number:	No.3
Number of Pages:	15
Page Range:	pp. 218-232
Identification Number:	10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.04.002
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
References:	Birch, A. J., Akmal, N., & Frampton, K. L. (2010). Two-year-olds are vigilant of others’ non-verbal cues to credibility. Developmental Science, 13, 363–369. Birch, A. J., Vauthier, S. A., & Bloom, P. (2008). Three- and four-year-olds spontaneously use others’ past performance to guide their learning. Cognition, 107, 1018–1034. Chow, V., Poulin-Dubois, D., & Lewis, J. (2008). To see or not to see: Infants prefer to follow the gaze of a reliable looker. Developmental Science, 11, 761–770. Corriveau, K. H.,&Harris, P. L. (2009). Choosing your informant: Weighing familiarity and recent accuracy. Developmental Science, 12, 426–437. Corriveau, K. H., Meints, K., & Harris, P. L. (2009). Early tracking of informant accuracy and inaccuracy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 331–342. Crowe, S., & Prescott, T. (2003). Continuity and change in the development of category structure: Insights from the semantic fluency task. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 467–479. Dowker, A. (2003). Young children’s estimates for addition: The zone of partial knowledge and understanding. In A. J. Baroody, & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills (pp. 243–266). Oxford: Routledge. Dowker, A. (2008). Individual differences in numerical abilities in preschoolers. Developmental Science, 11, 650–654. Fuson, K. C. (1988). Children’s counting and concepts of number. New York: Springer-Verlag. Harris, P. L., & Koenig, M. A. (2006). Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Development, 77, 505–524. Jaswal, V. K., &Malone, L. S. (2007). Turning believers into skeptics: 3-year-olds’ sensitivity to cues to speaker credibility. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8, 263–283. Jaswal, V. K., & Neely, L. A. (2006). Adults don’t always know best: Preschoolers use past reliability over age when learning new words. Psychological Science, 17, 757–758. Koenig, M. A., Clement, F., & Harris, P. L. (2004). Trust in testimony: Children’s use of true and false statements. Psychological Science, 15, 694–698. Koenig, M. A., & Harris, P. L. (2005). Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers. Child Development, 76, 1261–1277. Lucariello, J., Kyratzis, A., & Nelson, K. (1992). Taxonomic knowledge: What kind and when? Child Development, 63, 978–998. Lutz, D. J., & Keil, F. C. (2002). Early understanding of the division of cognitive labor. Child Development, 73, 1073–1084. Nurmsoo, E., & Robinson, E. J. (2009a). Children’s trust in previously inaccurate informants who were well or poorly informed: When past errors can be excused. Child Development, 80, 23–27. Nurmsoo, E., & Robinson, E. J. (2009b). Identifying unreliable informants: Do children excuse past inaccuracy? Developmental Science, 12, 41–47. Pasquini, E. S., Corriveau, K. H., Koenig, M. A., & Harris, P. L. (2007). Preschoolers monitor the relative accuracy of informants. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1216–1226. Robinson, E. J., & Nurmsoo, E. (2009). When do children learn from unreliable speakers? Cognitive Development, 24, 16–22. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605. Sabbagh, M. A.,&Baldwin, D. A. (2001). Learning words from knowledgeable versus ignorant speakers: Links between preschoolers’ theory of mind and semantic development. Child Development, 72, 1054–1070. Scofield, J., & Behrend, D. A. (2008). Learning words from reliable and unreliable speakers. Cognitive Development, 23, 278–290.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/5188

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item