Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Prioritizing areas for quality marker development in children in UK general practice : extending the use of the nominal group technique

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Gill, P. J., Hewitson, P., Peile, Ed and Harnden, A. (2012) Prioritizing areas for quality marker development in children in UK general practice : extending the use of the nominal group technique. Family Practice, Vol.29 (No.5). pp. 567-575. ISSN 0263-2136

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cms006

Abstract

Background There is a deficiency in the ability to measure the quality of care of children in primary care and there is no professional consensus in UK general practice regarding which quality markers should be used. Objectives To prioritize clinical areas on which to focus quality marker development in paediatric primary care and to describe the challenges in generating professional consensus. Methods We convened an expert panel of GPs with a special interest in child health and using the nominal group technique (NGT), a well-established structured, multistep facilitated group meeting technique, we generated consensus around the key clinical areas to focus quality marker development. Results Twelve GPs participated in the expert panel. The eight items agreed by panellists as most important were early recognition of serious illness, whole practice involvement in safeguarding, health promotion, mental health, evidence-based management of common conditions, child and carer friendliness and safe and cost-effective prescribing. Panel members struggled to balance the broad clinical areas while attempting to focus on specific areas that are important. The main challenges included managing panel uncertainty, effective organization, presentation of items for review and group inclination to ‘include everything’. Conclusions This is the first consensus study of UK GPs to identify key areas to target quality marker development in children. By using the NGT, we have highlighted front-line health care professionals' priorities to improve the quality of care of children and identified the benefits and challenges of developing consensus in a broad topic area.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Institute of Clinical Education (ICE)
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Journal or Publication Title: Family Practice
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 0263-2136
Date: 2012
Volume: Vol.29
Number: No.5
Page Range: pp. 567-575
Identification Number: 10.1093/fampra/cms006
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/52031

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us